John Simkin Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 After many appeals from serious researchers I have decided to reopen the JFK Forum. I will once again try to make it a place where members can rationally discuss the evidence. This time rule (iv) will be rigorously applied: Members should not make personal attacks on other members. Nor should references be made to their abilities as researchers. Most importantly, the motivations of the poster should not be questioned. At all times members should concentrate on what is being said, rather than who is saying it. It is up to the reader to look at the biography submitted by the poster, to judge whether they are telling the truth or not. The word xxxx is banned from use on the forum. We have tried warning persistent offenders and placing people on moderation. This seemed to have little impact on their long-term behaviour. In future I will be applying a zero-tolerance policy. If someone breaks the rules, I will remove their right to post on the Forum. In this way I hope to persuade some of those important researchers to return to the Forum.
David Lifton Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 After many appeals from serious researchers I have decided to reopen the JFK Forum. I will once again try to make it a place where members can rationally discuss the evidence. This time rule (iv) will be rigorously applied: Members should not make personal attacks on other members. Nor should references be made to their abilities as researchers. Most importantly, the motivations of the poster should not be questioned. At all times members should concentrate on what is being said, rather than who is saying it. It is up to the reader to look at the biography submitted by the poster, to judge whether they are telling the truth or not. The word xxxx is banned from use on the forum. We have tried warning persistent offenders and placing people on moderation. This seemed to have little impact on their long-term behaviour. In future I will be applying a zero-tolerance policy. If someone breaks the rules, I will remove their right to post on the Forum. In this way I hope to persuade some of those important researchers to return to the Forum. This is good, John. Thanks very much. DSL 7/15/13; 10:40 PM PDT Los Angeles, California
Chris Scally Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 Thank you very much, John. Here's to a happy and peaceful future...! Chris.
Malcolm Ward Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 I am glad you have reconsidered John.This is to important a Forum to lose.
Stephen Roy Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 Great to have the Forum back. I missed it. Here's hoping people have learned something, and will be more alert to posting within the rules.
Ray Mitcham Posted July 16, 2013 Posted July 16, 2013 Thank you, John. I hope contributors take note of your comments. We have an invaluable resource here, and we all must ensure that posters remember their manners.
Don Jeffries Posted July 17, 2013 Posted July 17, 2013 Thanks, John. I would imagine everyone is very happy about this.
B. A. Copeland Posted July 17, 2013 Posted July 17, 2013 Uh...thanks Mr Simkin...lol? What in the world did I miss?
Thomas Graves Posted July 18, 2013 Posted July 18, 2013 After many appeals from serious researchers I have decided to reopen the JFK Forum. I will once again try to make it a place where members can rationally discuss the evidence. This time rule (iv) will be rigorously applied: Members should not make personal attacks on other members. Nor should references be made to their abilities as researchers. Most importantly, the motivations of the poster should not be questioned. At all times members should concentrate on what is being said, rather than who is saying it. It is up to the reader to look at the biography submitted by the poster, to judge whether they are telling the truth or not. The word xxxx is banned from use on the forum. We have tried warning persistent offenders and placing people on moderation. This seemed to have little impact on their long-term behaviour. In future I will be applying a zero-tolerance policy. If someone breaks the rules, I will remove their right to post on the Forum. In this way I hope to persuade some of those important researchers to return to the Forum. John, Thank you. Hopefully the more fractious, divisive, and rude members have learned their lesson. --Tommy
Don Roberdeau Posted July 19, 2013 Posted July 19, 2013 (edited) After many appeals from serious researchers I have decided to reopen the JFK Forum. I will once again try to make it a place where members can rationally discuss the evidence. This time rule (iv) will be rigorously applied: Members should not make personal attacks on other members. Nor should references be made to their abilities as researchers. Most importantly, the motivations of the poster should not be questioned. At all times members should concentrate on what is being said, rather than who is saying it. It is up to the reader to look at the biography submitted by the poster, to judge whether they are telling the truth or not. The word xxxx is banned from use on the forum. We have tried warning persistent offenders and placing people on moderation. This seemed to have little impact on their long-term behaviour. In future I will be applying a zero-tolerance policy. If someone breaks the rules, I will remove their right to post on the Forum. In this way I hope to persuade some of those important researchers to return to the Forum. .... Good Day.... FWIW (and it is worth alot, imho + experiences), a key part of the formula for successes in nearly everything non-JFK-assassination-related that I have nearly always decided to choose, reinforce, + almost always, patiently, strive to keep in the "brain box" is the very simple + straightforward.... T ogether E veryoneA chieves M ore Best Regards in Research+++Don Donald Roberdeau United States Navy U.S.S. John F. Kennedy, CV-67, plank walker Sooner, or later, The Truth emerges Clearly For your key considerations and independent determinations.... Homepage: President KENNEDY "Men of Courage" speech, and Assassination Evidence, Witnesses, Suspects + Outstanding Researchers Discoveries and Key Considerations.... http://droberdeau.bl...ination_09.html The Dealey Plaza Detailed Map: Providing 11-22-63 Victims Precise Locations + Reactions, Evidence, Witnesses Locations, Suspected Bullet Trajectories, Important Information & Key Considerations, in One Convenient Resource.... http://img835.images...updated1111.gif (2012 updated map, + new information) Visual Report: The First Bullet Impact Into President Kennedy: While JFK was Still Hidden Under the "magic-limbed-ricochet-tree".... http://img504.images...k1102308ms8.gif Visual Report: Reality Versus C.A.D. : the Real World, versus, Garbage-in, Garbage-out.... http://img248.images...ealityvscad.gif Discovery: "Very Close JFK Assassination Witness ROSEMARY WILLIS Zapruder Film Documented 2nd Headsnap: West, Ultrafast, and Directly Towards the Grassy Knoll".... http://educationforu...?showtopic=2394 T ogether E veryone A chieves M ore For the United States: http://www.dhs.gov Edited August 15, 2013 by Don Roberdeau
Steven Kossor Posted July 20, 2013 Posted July 20, 2013 Wonderful news. Thanks for your thoughtful and helpful response from someone who has learned a great deal from the insights of others on this Forum.
Greg Burnham Posted July 20, 2013 Posted July 20, 2013 Thanks for reconsidering, John. Also, note that the "bug" (that was causing the posting glitch) has been corrected.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now