Jump to content
The Education Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think Mr. Specter has mixed up the doctors. It was Dr. Perry who speculated that the throat wound was an entry and might have caused the large head wound. I've never once heard Dr. Humes ever speculate about such a thing. In fact, Humes' autopsy report expressly verifies just the opposite -- i.e., the wound in JFK's throat was unquestionably an EXIT wound....

"The missile contused the strap muscles of the right side of the neck, damaged the trachea and made its exit through the anterior surface of the neck."

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0281b.htm

Edited by David Von Pein
Guest Robert Morrow
Posted

I think Mr. Specter has mixed up the doctors. It was Dr. Perry who speculated that the throat wound was an entry and might have caused the large head wound. I've never once heard Dr. Humes ever speculate about such a thing. In fact, Humes' autopsy report expressly verifies just the opposite -- i.e., the wound in JFK's throat was unquestionably an EXIT wound....

"The missile contused the strap muscles of the right side of the neck, damaged the trachea and made its exit through the anterior surface of the neck."

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0281b.htm

That would be the Humes autopsy report that he wrote after he BURNED THE JFK AUTOPSY NOTES. Humes was probably told, as Earl Warren was, if you don't come up with ONE shooter from behind we are going to have nuclear war because the Russians and Fidel Castro are behind this.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...