Cliff Varnell Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 You keep telling us about Fort Detrick, what did happen there? Please inform us. For the hundredth time (there is value in repetition): http://karws.gso.uri.edu/Marsh/New_Scans/flechette.txt Senseney said the CIA returned all the gear. What about the weapons tested by US Army Special Forces? If those were not returned, did one or two or these hi-tech weapons end up in Dealey Plaza? There is a genuine investigative lead that's been out there for almost 40 years, ignored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 And I will ask your question as to what happened to the bullets that caused JFK's throat and back wounds, but only once, not a hundred times, as you have asked it here. Ask the question from the podium at Wecht and I'll throw Tami the Street Sheet Lady a buck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted October 17, 2013 Author Share Posted October 17, 2013 A .300 hitter in baseball is considered top notch. In JFK Assassination Research a .100 hitter is top notch. 95% of everything said or written about the JFK assassination is some kind of bullxxxx, so if one can produce 10% gold with one's efforts -- hoo-ray! Tilting at windmills, digging rabbit hole after rabbit hole, over-looking obvious investigative leads -- Bill Kelly is still a solid .100 hitter, in spite of the the above. Bill has done excellent work on the cover-up of JFK's assassination. That he doesn't understand the first thing about the actual murder of JFK can be readily forgiven. What's the first thing? The back wound was too low to be associated with the throat wound, of course. Once you grasp that, there is no need to prove conspiracy otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted October 17, 2013 Author Share Posted October 17, 2013 (edited) A .300 hitter in baseball is considered top notch. In JFK Assassination Research a .100 hitter is top notch. 95% of everything said or written about the JFK assassination is some kind of bullxxxx, so if one can produce 10% gold with one's efforts -- hoo-ray! Bill Kelly is still a solid .100 hitter...Bill has done excellent work on the cover-up of JFK's assassination. At the risk of mixing metaphors, I think it useful to analyze the JFK Assassination Porn Industry as a series of leagues, like Major League Baseball. For the purpose of this discussion I'll refer only to 3 such leagues -- the Symposium Speakers League, the Internet Idiots League, and the Lone Nutters League. The latter isn't really a League in the sense the other two are. The Nutters don't play with actual bats and balls and gloves -- they pantomime everything, all strictly correographed, and every game is identically the same. The other two Leagues are the real deal. In the Speakers League we have Bill Kelly, a solid 100 hitter, great work on the AF1-White House transmissions. Jim DiEugenio is also a solid .100 hitter. Does great work on the historical background of the assassination. The knock on Jim is that he swings at everything, pretty much, and he'll foul off a million pitches before he strikes out. As far as the Internet Idiots League goes...Cliff Varnell doesn't believe in false modesty. Cliff Varnell has been the most feared hitter in the Idiots League for so long that he gets to refer to himself in the third person, like Rickey Henderson. A savage .120 lifetime hitter that Varnell cat...A machine...Think Tony Gwynn -- line drives to the left side every time. Every single time. The same spot. Almost the exact same spot. Time and time again. Hard to get through 88% of the time, but now and again Varnell gets something to pull...*(...wait for it...) Which is what Porno is all about, no? Edited October 17, 2013 by Cliff Varnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert Morrow Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 " And I will ask your question as to what happened to the bullets that caused JFK's throat and back wounds, but only once, not a hundred times, as you have asked it here." The plotters, the murderers of JFK, simply fished them out of the body and threw them away. Or, more likely, underlings were told if you don't do this, throw away the bullets and help us blame it on a single lone nut, there is going to be nuclear war and 40 million people are going to die. It is your patriotic duty to help us with this little deception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Cliff - I can't download your last link, but think I have read this info before. I don't find the idea of a high tech weapon being used at Dealey Plaza farfetched, and in fact find the argument that the throat entry wound might have been a neuro toxin believable. But I find it hard to imagine that Umbrella man delivered that poison dart. It does appear that Jfk was immobilized after that first hit. A normal reaction to being shot in the throat it seems to me would have been to duck, not freeze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted October 17, 2013 Author Share Posted October 17, 2013 " And I will ask your question as to what happened to the bullets that caused JFK's throat and back wounds, but only once, not a hundred times, as you have asked it here." The plotters, the murderers of JFK, simply fished them out of the body and threw them away. Or, more likely, underlings were told if you don't do this, throw away the bullets and help us blame it on a single lone nut, there is going to be nuclear war and 40 million people are going to die. It is your patriotic duty to help us with this little deception. Robert, That's the Lifton explanation. I have great respect for David. I disagree with his theories on the throat and back wounds, but at least he addresses the central issue of the murder. Going forward I'll argue that the greater weight of evidence points to hi-tech weaponry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted October 17, 2013 Author Share Posted October 17, 2013 Cliff - I can't download your last link, but think I have read this info before. I don't find the idea of a high tech weapon being used at Dealey Plaza farfetched, and in fact find the argument that the throat entry wound might have been a neuro toxin believable. But I find it hard to imagine that Umbrella man delivered that poison dart. It does appear that Jfk was immobilized after that first hit. A normal reaction to being shot in the throat it seems to me would have been to duck, not freeze. Paul, I'm getting an error message now, too. I've seen it happen with this page before. I'm with you 100% on Witt. As silly as his story sounds, it's nowhere as silly as thinking that a guy with an umbrella pumping up and down was part of a Presidential Assassination. Free Louis Witt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now