Malcolm Ward Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Clint Hill is still standing on the back bumper and is nowhere close to what is perceived as JFK sitting up in the limo. Yes you are right Bob,I am due a eye exam,about time I booked it LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Adams Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) Post removed (by me) Edited February 28, 2014 by Terry Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trygve V. Jensen Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 On 2/24/2014 at 9:37 PM, Thomas H. Purvis said: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What would appear to be a true researcher! Now, delete the word "alledgely", as the three shots in approximately 5.6 seconds is BS. Factually, there were only two shots in this elapsed time. Shot#3 did not occur until approximately 1.9 seconds AFTER the Z313/Shot#2 headshot. And, due to the short elapsed time, this had to be what is referred to as a "Snap Shot" in which one throws the rifle up, and utilizing it's fixed iron sights, shoots. Which shot, by the way also struck JFK in the head. Tom Just bumping , as this seems to be Thomas' last post I can find here. Anyone heard from him ? We had some private messaging going on, and I see we had discussed some of his research, - he allowing me to publish some of it, - "with limitations", whatever what was meant by that, as long as attaching copyright - notices. What happened in the following years , with his research, - I have no idea atm. If it was published / debunked , - or if he even located the remaining boxes of it. What remains in my old disk, - is just a fragment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 Thomas Purvis passed away a few years back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trygve V. Jensen Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 I was afraid of that. Thank you very much Mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 (edited) On 2/24/2014 at 3:37 PM, Thomas H. Purvis said: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What would appear to be a true researcher! Now, delete the word "alledgely", as the three shots in approximately 5.6 seconds is BS. Factually, there were only two shots in this elapsed time. Shot#3 did not occur until approximately 1.9 seconds AFTER the Z313/Shot#2 headshot. And, due to the short elapsed time, this had to be what is referred to as a "Snap Shot" in which one throws the rifle up, and utilizing it's fixed iron sights, shoots. Which shot, by the way also struck JFK in the head. Tom Is this Purvis: https://www.gctimesonline.com/obituaries/article_9882c6c8-bf42-11e3-98da-001a4bcf6878.html ? Edited May 29, 2019 by Micah Mileto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 (edited) I just viewed again a few versions of the Zapruder film on You Tube for the 3,000th time. I wanted to once again view Kennedy being hit with the last two of 3 shots on Elm street and especially the 2nd shot that according to the Warren Report, went through JFK and struck John Connally in the upper right back just left of his right arm pit. As always, my sense of geometric dynamics tells me that there is no way that a bullet could enter JFK's upper back...come out his neck next to his Adams Apple ... and then hit John Connally in his right upper back and have originated from the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository building commonly referred to as "the Sniper's Nest." The directional line of such a bullet entering JFK where his autopsy photos depict, exiting through his neck and then entering John Connally shows a line of flight on a much more level plane than a 6th floor firing would have come in from. And since the JFK back shot supposedly did not traverse through any bone and instead only encountered much softer tissue in it's through and through path, the question of deflection downward as a result of hard bone obstruction such as Connally's bullet injury path effected by such isn't plausible. What I see on the Zapruder film seems obvious to me in this regard. Edited May 30, 2019 by Joe Bauer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now