Steven Gaal Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 (edited) 9/11: The Best Physical Evidence of Explosives- DavidChandler911 Published on Mar 7, 2014 Posted by Joe on Fri, 03/07/2014 - 4:44pm 9/11: The Best Physical Evidence of ExplosivesDavidChandler911 Published on Mar 7, 2014 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ################################################### David Chandler, ASU 2/18/2014: Guest Lecture at Arizona State University by invitation of 9/11 Studies and Outreach, a student group affiliated with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The talk was followed extensive Q & A, not shown here.here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bi4hH2Ew54 Edited March 9, 2014 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 This guy has already been proven wrong: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 10, 2014 Author Share Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) This guy has already been proven wrong: BURTON ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ (see debunking the debunkers site) ????? you mean your source AlienEntity 1 OH !!!!! it was debunkers like AlienEntity who first brought Verinage demolitions to our attention! The reason I wrote the article "Debunker Verinage Fantasies Are Bunk!" (LINK) is because JREFers were using them to explain the WTC collapses. I motion-tracked them to show that they appear to actually support our position because the falling sections in those cases experienced a jolt, unlike the north tower. Now you say it's a pointless comparison. I guess they're comparable when they work for you but when they don't, they're not! Much like how you think a 14 story University building and a five story toy factory are comparable, because they collapsed due to fire, but all the skyscrapers that caught fire and didn't collapse - One Meridian Plaza, First Interstate Bank, East Parque Central, Windsor Tower, Mandarin Oriental Hotel etc. - aren't comparable due to their structural differences! Regarding the "tube in tube construction", the pile-driver theory actually makes even less sense if that is considered, which is why Bazant et al have to work in blocks to begin with. Edited March 10, 2014 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now