Jump to content
The Education Forum

9/11 coincidences and oddities page!


Recommended Posts

Actually the more I look into it the more I think you're right, the Mexican-American War "must have been some big setup" but that's not relevant because as stated earlier, "Just because something may have happened at one point is not evidence that something vaguely similar may have happened over 150 years later. I've not seen anyone here dispute that the Bush administration may have lied."

Edited by Len Colby
Link to post
Share on other sites

what's lacking is legitimate evidence 9/11 was a false flag // Colby

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

FALSE FLAG INDICATIONS IN COLOR BELOW

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For years mainstream media journalists have failed to properly investigate and report about 9/11. They simply pretend that all the unanswered questions have no bearing on policies like torture. If they are ever called on their pathetic coverage they typically resort to bashing conspiracy theorists.

Here are two issues that have been well documented. Yet the media has never gotten answers:

1) Are the redacted 28 pages in the Joint Inquiry report not relevant? How on earth can one reconcile the notion of a panicked White House implementing a desperate, ad-hoc torture program with a deliberate White House effort to cover up direct links to the hijackers?

2) Why has the mainstream media failed to investigate CIA's deliberate obstruction of al Qaeda investigations before 9/11? Not one single mainstream journalist has ever gotten a credible explanation for the CIA's conduct. There has never been a single interview with Alec Station chief Rich Blee or deputy chief Tom Wilshire. How are we supposed to reconcile panicked CIA officials giving NSA Rice an urgent briefing on 7/10/01 with a deliberate CIA effort to impede al Qaeda related investigations during the same time frame?

The Bush White House and the CIA were both highly involved in the torture program. So their 9/11 related conduct has everything to do with the torture report. How can the public take journalists seriously when they decry government efforts to clamp down on press freedom? When you read all the analysis of the torture report next week note how many articles use stupid phrases like "a good faith torture program implemented by panicked officials desperate to protect the Homeland."

Was the torture program actually a "tough on terror" PR campaign intended to mask high level corruption? A PR campaign sold to the public by so called investigative journalists?

noise on Thu, 12/04/2014 - 1:55am. (911 BLOG)
++++++++++++++++
Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

SPAM Oh is that your meal ?? BLEE GAVE INACCURATE INFORMATION (WHEN HE HAD CORRECT) AND PLOTTERS GOT AWAY......WHY ??
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

FALSE FLAG INDICATIONS IN COLOR BELOW

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For years mainstream media journalists have failed to properly investigate and report about 9/11. They simply pretend that all the unanswered questions have no bearing on policies like torture. If they are ever called on their pathetic coverage they typically resort to bashing conspiracy theorists.

Here are two issues that have been well documented. Yet the media has never gotten answers:

1) Are the redacted 28 pages in the Joint Inquiry report not relevant? How on earth can one reconcile the notion of a panicked White House implementing a desperate, ad-hoc torture program with a deliberate White House effort to cover up direct links to the hijackers?

2) Why has the mainstream media failed to investigate CIA's deliberate obstruction of al Qaeda investigations before 9/11? Not one single mainstream journalist has ever gotten a credible explanation for the CIA's conduct. There has never been a single interview with Alec Station chief Rich Blee or deputy chief Tom Wilshire. How are we supposed to reconcile panicked CIA officials giving NSA Rice an urgent briefing on 7/10/01 with a deliberate CIA effort to impede al Qaeda related investigations during the same time frame?

The Bush White House and the CIA were both highly involved in the torture program. So their 9/11 related conduct has everything to do with the torture report. How can the public take journalists seriously when they decry government efforts to clamp down on press freedom? When you read all the analysis of the torture report next week note how many articles use stupid phrases like "a good faith torture program implemented by panicked officials desperate to protect the Homeland."

Was the torture program actually a "tough on terror" PR campaign intended to mask high level corruption? A PR campaign sold to the public by so called investigative journalists?

noise on Thu, 12/04/2014 - 1:55am. (911 BLOG)
Link to post
Share on other sites
  1. Nice wall of Spam! // COLBY POST # 20
  2. GAAL REPOST # 21 PART OF INFO THAT IS NOT RESPONDED to
  3. Why do you keep repeating yourself? post #22 // COLBY

}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

ANSWER POST # 23

BECAUSE YOU DONT HAVE A GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THE MATERIAL PROVIDED/POSTED ABOUT and JUST YELL SPAM.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...