Jump to content
The Education Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

In this thread myths will be debunked.

Myth #1 sound of rifle shots.

The first myth that will be analyzed is that witnesses heard different sounds and different number of shots depending on where they were located within Dealey Plaza.

I have put together some crude maps, I would appreciate any corrections if information posted is not correct.

The witnesses are not in exact locations but they should be in appropriate areas.

This first map is witnesses that heard three shots, all equal sounding, in other words all rifle shots.

The arrow indicates the direction they thought the shots came from.

This first map has just the witnesses that either believed the three shots came from the monument area or they didn't know where OR they were not asked.

Edited by Robert Mady
  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Here is map of witnesses that heard three equal rifle shots and indicated the Monument area as the source of the shots or did not indicate the source or were not asked.

3shots-Monument_zpsf46d3c84.jpg

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted (edited)

Here is map of witnesses only mentioned hearing two equal rifle shots and indicated the monumemt or TSBD as the source of the shots.

2shots-Monument_zpscfbac504.jpg

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted (edited)

Here is an important map of witnesses only mentioned hearing rifle shots, the FBI failed to obtain the number of shots and or the origin of the shots.

Unknownshots-UnknownLocation_zps7b29edef

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted (edited)

Here is same map of witnesses only mentioned hearing rifle shots, the FBI failed to obtain the number of shots and or the origin of the shots. But now think of where these witnesses were located and if the FBI purposely failed to obtain a location for the shots. If these witnesses whould have indicated the TSBD as the location do you suppose the FBI would have recorded claims?

FBI-Failure-Unknownshots-UnknownLocation

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted (edited)

I should have stated it clearly to begin with.

There is a distinct difference in claims made by civilian verses government elected officials, their spouses, enforcemant officers and local news media people, this is why witnesses are color coded, civilian with blue lettering and all others with green. You will notice the majority of witnesses claiming the TSBD as the location for the shots are government and news media, civilians and court personnel indicate the monument area and national news media generally did not indicate a location even though they were underneath the TSBD window and would have been in an ideal location to determine where the shots originated from.

I hope these maps make it clear that the government / local news media primarily lied to corroborate the WC fiction.

No shots came from the TSBD. NONE.

Only four witnesses made claims that can be intrepreted as meaning they heard the first shot that sounded like a 'firecracker',

although it should be more,

the witnesses should include;

GAYLE NEWMAN

WILLIAM NEWMAN

SSA CLINT HILL

SSA LANDIS

SSA READY

SSA HICKEY

SSA BENNETT

Newmans claims are corroborated by distance of limo to their location, sound of the shot and reaction by Kennedy.

The SSA are corroborated by all looking to the gk simultanously as well as doing so at a location indicated by the Newmans as to when the 'firecracker' sounding shot occurred.

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted

Myth #2

Witnesses claimed shots came from the picket fence which was to the front of the limo at Z-313.

Almost every witnesses claimed the shots came from the monument area in back of Zapruder.

Some witnesses claimed shots originated near the underpass, but this is certainly based mostly on the location of the witness. for instance from the TSBD the underpass is almost in line with the monument area, from south of the underpass the underpass was in between.

All three rifle shots came from the monument area not the picket fence, there were no rifle shots that came from the picket fence.

Posted (edited)

Myth #3

President Kennedy was shot from the front and was driven back and to the left.

Absolute deception.

Analyze the Zapruder film, Kennedy is driven to his left and slightly to the rear.

The shot came almost directly from his side.

The shot drives Kennedy to his left, we can see his right arm raise up as his body is driven to the left.

If he was driven to the rear his body would have been driven back, his head would have been driven back, KENNEDY does move back but primarily to his left.

The saying should be to his left.

The first rifle shot at Z-313 came from the monument area to the rear and right of Zapruder which was just slightly to the front of the limo.

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted

Robert,

I believe the extant Z-film is a fabrication, but in any event you write that the first shot was at Z-313.

Do you mean the first shot many witnesses heard was the Z-313 shot?

Posted (edited)

Myth #4

Kennedy is shot from the front and is hit in the temple.

Kennedy is hit from the side, behind his ear, this shot disentragrates the brain in the back of KENNEDYS head and as the bullet passes thru it destroys the occipital bone, pieces are expelled along with brain tissue toward Hargis and Brehm.

The scalp stayed attached to the head but became a flap, which rebounded and covered KENNEDYS right ear, which to many made it look like the shot took off KENNEDYS ear, it was hidden behind the flap.

There were no bullet wounds found on KENNEDYS face, the only wound was in the rear right side of his head, about 5 cm across.

It was both an entrance wound and an exit wound.

Edited by Robert Mady
Posted

Robert,

I believe the extant Z-film is a fabrication, but in any event you write that the first shot was at Z-313.

Do you mean the first shot many witnesses heard was the Z-313 shot?

Yes, the first rifle shot heard was at Z-313

The first shot was a shot that sounded like a 'firecracker' meaning a slight pop, and occurred at ~Z-189, which caused the throat wound.

Jon, I agree that the Zapruder film was altered, but it is not a complete fabrication.

Posted

Robert,

I believe the extant Z-film is a fabrication, but in any event you write that the first shot was at Z-313.

Do you mean the first shot many witnesses heard was the Z-313 shot?

Jon, what part of the Zapruder film do you believe has been fabricated, or do you believe all of it as well as the Nix, Muchmore and Bronson are also fabricated?

The film is corroborated by majority testimony and visa versa, IF WC and conspiracy theories are disregarded.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...