Jump to content
The Education Forum

Kicked off of hosting service


Ron Ecker
 Share

Recommended Posts

For a while now I have had my non-JFK-related webpages on a free hosting service called byethost. My JFK webpage and articles are on another free service, Angelfire. But Angelfire has distracting ads and pop-ups, so I decided to upload the JFK material to the byethost site, with the idea of then deleting it from Angelfire. But no sooner did I get the material uploaded at byethost than my whole website disappeared. No warning, nothing, just gone. I'm sure (without bothering to look) that I must have violated the terms and conditions for free use, which includes not saying anything bad about the U.S. government or anything else.

I'm now having to build a new website, this one paid for, which will include the JFK material presently on Angelfire. But there are two lessons, I think, to be learned here. One, you get what you pay for. And two, be careful where you say anything about a JFK conspiracy. It can cost you, even 51 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron, I will be interested if you get an actual explanation of what happened with the site....honestly assuming you were kicked off just for JFK material sounds a little paranoid. I've written three books which are at a minimum unflattering to several government agencies, especially the CIA, and I've seen no response to either the books, my web site or my blog... No threats, no harassment, nada. I'm not saying it never occurs but I'm not sure its reasonable to assume that's an outstanding risk for conspiracy research in general.

In the meantime I need to make sure those helicopters flying past are just routine military and not black and unmarked... usually even those just wave though....grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry,

Just to prove that I'm paranoid but that sometimes they really are out to get you, I looked at their terms and conditions. They include the following:

"You agree to not use the Service to:

  1. upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable."

"Otherwise objectionable" can of course mean anything on God's green Earth.

And if I had to guess, I would say that what they especially objected to was my article "Greetings from Lee Harvey Oswald." I can see how they might consider it "hateful," since it was written that way.

Edited by Ron Ecker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ron,

This is the part of the saga I don't understand. The US Government had the final say on the JFK assassination with the HSCA report in 1978. No action has been taken to modify its conclusions that JFK was probably killed by a conspiracy of some kind, LHO's bullets did all the damage & his helper was incompetent. Why would the Government care about anyone bad mouthing its conclusions when the matter is settled? The Government seems to respond when people skip paying their taxes, gather in the streets, display weapons or hang out with religious fanatics. Disappointment & rejection of the Government's investigation & conclusion regarding the death of JFK doesn't seem to garnish a ripple in the stream of life, does it?

The Government doesn't go after LN'ers arguing the HSCA is wrong & the WC Report it replaced got it right. It can be said that they wreck as much havoc with the global public as CT'ers do.

Let's not forget the MSM that consistently reports & broadcasts that LHO alone assassinated JFK. That is NOT what the US Government concluded in 1978 with the HSCA; the Government concluded LHO had some help in the deed. TV networks consistently broadcast TV specials pushing the 'Oswald did it alone' theme. The Government doesn't punish the MSM for any of this. MSM needs FCC licenses to broadcast. One would think MSM would wear velvet gloves when reporting on Government reports to avoid repercussions but it appears MSM does what it wants, doesn't it?

The statement Gary Mack made in 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy' about there being two official reports on the death of President Kennedy is inaccurate; there is ONE & ONE only official report on the death of JFK & that is the HSCA's 1978 report that debunked & rescinded the earlier WC Report. Military employees can be court martialed for following a rescinded order while ignoring the authority that replaced it.

So why isn't EVERYONE in prison? (LOL). Who is going to pay taxes when everybody is in prison?

I don't believe either the WC or the HSCA & I've read dozens of CT & a few LN books. I've seen all the JFK TV specials pushing the 'Oswald did it' theme. I visit a couple of the JFK online forums & blogs. I've discussed the JFK assassination in public & in private. I've sent & received emails on the subject. I've gone to bookstores & purchased CT & LN books. I bought several tickets to see the JFK movie when it first came out. I gave speeches & book reports in high school. Wrote term papers in college. I'm obviously guilty of rattling the Government's tree on the JFK case. Why am I still here?

If I have to share a prison cell with the likes of other 'tree shakers' like Mark Lane, John McAdams, Megyn Kelly, Bill O'Reilly, Gerald Posner, etc, I'm letting 'them' know now that I'm not settling on anyone other than Megyn Kelly. It's either Megyn as my cellmate or finish me off in the van when I'm arrested.

I've shaken the tree much harder & longer than Ron. 'They' should come after & bring me in first. It's not my fault I'm the way I am now; it's the Government's fault. Had Uncle Sam simply told me it didn't know what happened to JFK & who was responsible instead of feeding me BS, that would have worked with me just fine & saved me a lot of time I'll never get back & money I wasted searching for answers that made sense.

Best,

BM

Edited by Brad Milch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ron,

This is the part I don't understand. The US Government had the final say on the JFK assassination with the HSCA report in 1978. No action has been taken to modify its conclusions that JFK was probably killed by a conspiracy of some kind, LHO's bullets did all the damage & his helper was incompetent. Why would the Government care about anyone bad mouthing its conclusions; the matter is settled. The Government doesn't go after LN'ers arguing the HSCA is wrong & the WC Report it replaced got it right. It can be said that they wreck as much havoc with the global public as CT'ers do. So why isn't EVERONE in jail? (LOL)

Best,

BM

Be patient, it's coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if I had to guess, I would say that what they especially objected to was my article "Greetings from Lee Harvey Oswald." I can see how they might consider it "hateful," since it was written that way.

I'd kind of like to read that.

Edited by David Andrews
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howdy, Robert Prudhomme:

Have you seen this yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UW5cHsyLxZc

As a firearms man, I suspect you will find this new & unorthodox analysis interesting. I like the analyst's method of covering up the evidence: remove a couple of bolts, nuts & washers aboard the C-130 cargo plane that flew JFK's death car out of Dallas & replace John Connally's jump seat with an unrigged one with no blast residue. Kinda reminds me of that conspirator changing the tire in the closed auto shop in 'Blow Out'.

BM

PS: My apologies to Ron Ecker for (hopefully not) possibly distracting from his thread. I simply couldn't find a better place to put this to catch Mr. Prudhomme's attention (he's like a killer whale moving around all over the visitor tanks at Sea World (lol).

I'll look at your stuff too, Ron, I promise.

BM

Edited by Brad Milch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff you have there, Ron!

Satirical humor is an enjoyable vehicle when used as a teaching aid & the message often sticks in people's memory banks better. Some famous educators, comedians & other celebs owe their fortunes & careers to effective satirical humor. For example, in view of current civil disobedience events in Baltimore, NYC & other cities, who can forget Chris Rock's famous routine that concluded with the warning of, 'Everybody knows that if the police have to chase after you, they're bringing an [substituted word = 'booty'] whipping' with them'.

(lol)

That small bit of satirical humor help launch what turned into a multi-million dollar long lasting career for Mr. Rock back when he was first getting his feet wet in a stand-up comedy career. You might be hanging out with him soon?

Best,

BM

Edited by Brad Milch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...