Tony Krome Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 (edited) Mark Lane in 1967; Mark Lane in 1968; Then check out what Lane revealed publicly .... then 6 hours later, RFK was dead; Edited May 8, 2019 by Tony Krome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Couteau Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 What a prescient quote. Lane was always ahead of the curve. His last memoir makes for great reading. What newspaper is the clipping from, Tony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Krome Posted May 8, 2019 Author Share Posted May 8, 2019 51 minutes ago, Rob Couteau said: What a prescient quote. Lane was always ahead of the curve. His last memoir makes for great reading. What newspaper is the clipping from, Tony? Bennington Banner (Vermont) pp2 - 11th June 68 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Couteau Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Krome Posted May 8, 2019 Author Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Rob Couteau said: Thanks. I just added more to the first post from the article; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Couteau Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 That is chilling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Jolliffe Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 13 hours ago, Tony Krome said: I just added more to the first post from the article; Tony, Any idea on which "Washington, D.C. television broadcast" six hours before the RFK assassination did Mark Lane reveal RFK's suspicions about JFK's murder? That would be a clip worth having! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Krome Posted May 8, 2019 Author Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Paul Jolliffe said: Tony, Any idea on which "Washington, D.C. television broadcast" six hours before the RFK assassination did Mark Lane reveal RFK's suspicions about JFK's murder? That would be a clip worth having! I've been looking for it, no luck yet! I bet it crossed Lane's mind that he said something he shouldn't of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. A. Copeland Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 I mean....wouldn't putting such a quote in a popular paper be something of a bad decision? Essentially threatening RFK's life as well? I mean if you believe it was a conspiracy and those responsible were powerful enough to place guns between RFK and the WH, I'm not even sure I'd want such a statement quoted in a paper. If this is all legit...then wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence Schnapf Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 so is there any evidence in any of the Garrison materials confirming the supposed message from RFK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Krome Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 11 minutes ago, Lawrence Schnapf said: so is there any evidence in any of the Garrison materials confirming the supposed message from RFK? On 10th May 1967, when Lane stated that RFK would launch his own investigation, Garrison was right there with him before the Grand Jury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Adams Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 If it is true that Mark lane made this, obviously, very private statement by RFK public, then he had to know he was putting the Senator's life in extreme danger. And, as Tony states, Garrison was there when he said it, he obviously had no regard for RFK's safety!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hargrove Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Since the Boston story was from UPI, probably scores of daily papers published it. Thanks for posting this, Tony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Bulman Posted May 16, 2019 Share Posted May 16, 2019 On 5/9/2019 at 6:31 AM, Terry Adams said: If it is true that Mark lane made this, obviously, very private statement by RFK public, then he had to know he was putting the Senator's life in extreme danger. And, as Tony states, Garrison was there when he said it, he obviously had no regard for RFK's safety!! While maybe Lane shouldn't have made the statement publicly on television while RFK was still alive without his permission, it didn't cause RFK's death. If it came six hours before he was shot, not before he died, the wheels were already in motion. The plan was predicated on RFK winning California. If he did it went into action. Already rehearsed. Maheu had Cesar lined up well before this and Sirhan hypnotized many times already. Read A Lie Too Big to Fail and tell me different. The timing of Lane's public remarks is chilling though. I've never read this myself. Thanks also for posting it Tony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Adams Posted May 16, 2019 Share Posted May 16, 2019 (edited) Ron, I totally agree with you on everything you are saying. I should have added it in my post. The fact that he would take such information given him and make it public just angered me so much I had to say something about it. When Robert Kennedy, himself, says "there are guns between me and the white house", it is because he knows this, it is not, in my opinion, speculation. With all of the respect I have for Mark Lane, and it is immense, he should have known the risk he could be putting RFK in. Obviously the Ambassador Hotel plan was already in the works, but my belief is that with Bobby saying he was going to prosecute the perpetrators of his brother's murder, it seemed that he had names. These people were not going to let him get into the position to do that!! Edited May 16, 2019 by Terry Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now