W. Niederhut Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 28 minutes ago, Joseph McBride said: Thanks for your kind comments about my Spielberg book, Jim. Yes, Spielberg has taken the care to educate himself in history. He is an autodidact, partly because he is dyslexic, which caused him to be a weak student in high school. His historical films are carefully researched. I interviewed 35 Holocaust survivors to see what they thought of SCHINDLER'S LIST. They all said the same things -- that it was so authentic it felt like being back there in the midst of those events, which is a high compliment. Their criticisms were that the film, as violent as it is, was not as violent as the actual events -- even though the film pushes the envelope on realistic violence and does not flinch from it, some of the stories they told me would have caused people to run out of theaters, as Spielberg said when explaining why he didn't show SS men throwing babies into the air and spearing them with bayonets for "fun" during the liquidation of the Krakow ghetto (you can be sure Tarantino would have shown that). I heard one story from a survivor of the Plaszow camp that is the worst Holocaust story I have ever heard, and that is saying a lot. The survivors also said Ralph Fiennes was too handsome to play Amon Goeth, who was an ugly monster. Spielberg wanted to explore the human nature of even such an evil man, so casting an actor who looked like a slug might have worked against it by desensitizing the audience. But the survivors emphasized those were relatively minor complaints in view of the film's overall honesty. They were deeply grateful for it. By the way, Polanski turned it down because he was actually in the liquidation of the Krakow ghetto, and even he felt he was not ready to deal with the subject of the Holocaust then (he later did with THE PIANIST). Hopefully, Spielberg will eventually make a historically accurate film about the Israeli snipers who have been shooting all of those Palestinian protesters in Gaza lately. Also, why has Hollywood never produced a single movie about the 20 million Russians and Ukrainians murdered by Bolsheviks like Beria and Kaganovich in the worst holocaust in human history? Link to post Share on other sites
Joseph McBride Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Spielberg did make MUNICH and predictably got pilloried for it. Link to post Share on other sites
Anthony Thorne Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Fair play to Spielberg, I thought MUNICH was really good, as is Joe's biography, which I read again (updated version) a year ago. Link to post Share on other sites
James DiEugenio Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 JM: By the way, Polanski turned it down because he was actually in the liquidation of the Krakow ghetto, Well, that is something I was not aware of. Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Bauer Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 (edited) Slightly odd coincidence with Tex Watson, Sharon Tate and Dallas, Texas. Sharon Tate was born in 1943 ... in Dallas, Texas. Tex Watson was born in 1945 ... in Dallas, Texas. Edited August 4, 2019 by Joe Bauer Link to post Share on other sites
Robert Harper Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 On 7/28/2019 at 12:36 PM, Robert Harper said: without their knowledge; this time, it was dressed up in academic garb, and - like Kinsey's studies - used a warped sampling to bombard an individual's brain, with his or her reaction to stress, and the ability to withstand Link to post Share on other sites
Cliff Varnell Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) 23 hours ago, Robert Harper said: So Bryan Crusius raised his son Patrick to be an anti-social loner programmed to slaughter 22 people for the express purpose of arousing condemnation of white supremacy and give impetus to the banning of military-style assault weapons? This strikes me as more QAnon conspiracy pornography to give legitimate study of deep events a black eye. Edited August 8, 2019 by Cliff Varnell Link to post Share on other sites
John Kozlowski Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 On 8/4/2019 at 5:56 AM, Joe Bauer said: Slightly odd coincidence with Tex Watson, Sharon Tate and Dallas, Texas. Sharon Tate was born in 1943 ... in Dallas, Texas. Tex Watson was born in 1945 ... in Dallas, Texas. I read something last night that said they may have mutual friends years before the murders. Let me try to find the link. The article was interesting. Link to post Share on other sites
Joseph McBride Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 (edited) Sharon Tate's father was in Army Intelligence. The "Manson murders" (per CHAOS) had connections suggestive of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program. Edited August 8, 2019 by Joseph McBride Link to post Share on other sites
Pamela Brown Posted August 10, 2019 Share Posted August 10, 2019 On 8/7/2019 at 10:21 PM, Joseph McBride said: Sharon Tate's father was in Army Intelligence. The "Manson murders" (per CHAOS) had connections suggestive of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program. Also, by odd coincidence, Sharon Tate and her unborn child were killed by the Manson gang, who scrawled "Helter Skelter" at one crime scene. Roman Polanski was Sharon Tate's husband. He filmed "Rosemary's Baby", which came out the year before, at the Dakota, where John Lennon was later killed... Link to post Share on other sites
James DiEugenio Posted August 10, 2019 Share Posted August 10, 2019 Good interview with the author of Chaos. I will be developing these points even further in my review. https://whowhatwhy.org/2019/08/09/everything-you-know-about-charles-manson-is-wrong/ Link to post Share on other sites
Lewis Reynolds Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Interesting radio show. I know O'Neill wants to sell books, but it would be nice to have a little more information in the interviews he does. Better order the book I suppose! Link to post Share on other sites
Denny Zartman Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 I've put an order for "Chaos" on hold at my local library, and look forward to reading it when my turn comes around. I'm sorry I wasn't watching this thread earlier. I saw Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood, and I enjoyed reading the film criticism here. The debate over the film, Quentin Tarantino, and depicting history in cinema is interesting. Link to post Share on other sites
Ron Bulman Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 My copy of this came in yesterday. In perusing it before starting I thought 61 pages of end notes should mean it's well documented though I've referred to none of them yet. I probably shouldn't give this away for any planning to read it but the first line of the prologue made me chuckle. "Vincent Bugliosi was on another tirade." Leading to "Bugliosi wanted to sue me". Not just a tirade. But, another tirade. But it's not a funny subject. I'd read before about multiple stab wounds, shocking numbers of them, the words on the wall and door in blood. But the details of the crimes are just horrific. I won't go into detail here for the sake of those who may read it for themselves. Disturbing how one can convince others to do such, especially someone like Manson. Up to page 83. Though it's in reference to an associate of another character in the book I never expected to find the name of General Curtis LeMay in such a book. Link to post Share on other sites
James DiEugenio Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 That is where Tom gets into what I consider fantasy land. I am almost done with my review. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now