Douglas Caddy Posted August 29, 2019 Posted August 29, 2019 An inside job: CIA a suspect for some in JFK's killing https://www.nbcnews.com/news/other/inside-job-cia-suspect-some-jfks-killing-f2D11627219?fbclid=IwAR093OsgeGcQfytOA1xWhsv1DncZ5aZmEukSplvJPGXHr4W_JfiaFDLMQSk
Andrew Prutsok Posted August 29, 2019 Posted August 29, 2019 "Like many Americans, he could not accept that a man as ordinary as Lee Harvey Oswald could have acted alone in assassinating the president of the United States, his brother John F. Kennedy." Fluent Russian speaker who defected, married a Russian, nonchalantly returns to the US, gets mixed up with Cuban revolutionaries and White Russians is ordinary? I do that stuff all the time.
B. A. Copeland Posted August 29, 2019 Posted August 29, 2019 8 hours ago, Andrew Prutsok said: "Like many Americans, he could not accept that a man as ordinary as Lee Harvey Oswald could have acted alone in assassinating the president of the United States, his brother John F. Kennedy." I can accept that logically without issue as a mere possibility but only when the evidence suggests it. However, the evidence simply does not line up or even suggests such a conclusion.
Terry Adams Posted August 30, 2019 Posted August 30, 2019 (edited) The CIA would not comment on the lawsuit, but the agency dismisses all accusations that it was involved in a conspiracy to kill the president.(taken from the article) “While the CIA conspiracy theories make good fodder for movies, they are pure fiction,” spokesman Edward Price said. My question here is; how would Mr. Price know anymore about CIA involvement than you or me! Does he have access to the papers that Jefferson Morley has been attempting to get through the FOIA for more than a decade. I don't think so! It is an opinion of a man who happens to be allowed to write "CIA" after his name. Edited August 30, 2019 by Terry Adams
Guest Posted August 30, 2019 Posted August 30, 2019 Can you edit your post and mention that this article is from 2013... Thanks.
Lawrence Schnapf Posted August 30, 2019 Posted August 30, 2019 19 hours ago, B. A. Copeland said: I can accept that logically without issue as a mere possibility but only when the evidence suggests it. However, the evidence simply does not line up or even suggests such a conclusion. what evidence are you suggesting? the current historical record was in large part manufactured and would not have survived scrutiny in court much less be admissible
Jim Harwood Posted August 30, 2019 Posted August 30, 2019 I'm surprised Lisa Pease describes John Kennedy as a leftist. To me he was anything but a leftist at least as I know them today. To me he was an American System President like Lincoln, McKinley, FDR etc. No US President has practiced the American System since his assassination, instead they've all gone with British Free Trade.
B. A. Copeland Posted August 31, 2019 Posted August 31, 2019 On 8/30/2019 at 11:39 AM, Lawrence Schnapf said: what evidence are you suggesting? the current historical record was in large part manufactured and would not have survived scrutiny in court much less be admissible That is exactly what I am referring to (apologies for lack of specificity or clarity) but the official “evidence” against LHO is what I was attacking. I could accept absolutely that LHO carried out what the WC theorized if there were strong solid evidence to support such a conclusion (or theory).
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now