Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mark Zaid, JFK and Trump


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Andrew Prutsok said:

Some dude just suffered a seizure during Roger Stone's trial. That sounds familiar.

Yes, and after endless delays, the notorious CREEPster Roger Stone suffered from a bout of "food poisoning" today.

Will he experience a debilitating case of phlebitis next, like his hero Dick Nixon?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

W. Niederhut said: 

  Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA.

Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pamela Brown said:

W. Niederhut said: 

  Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA.

Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.  

     That New England caste system was also the subject of Harvard classicist Erich Segal's 1970 best selling novel, Love Story, and the film, starring Ryan O'Neal and Ali McGraw (though not entirely analogous to the Kennedy case, in that the Roman Catholic Italian girl in Love Story was from the working class.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pamela Brown said:

W. Niederhut said: 

  Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA.

Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.  

JMHO, maybe one of the most prescient things ever said on the forum.  The Kennedy's were neuveau riche and JFK's power was despised by the true powers that be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Pamela Brown said:

W. Niederhut said: 

  Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA.

Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.  

So funny because I've always suspected a little dollup in the ol' Bush gene pool. Missing a brick or two off the pallet so to speak. Not the sort of people who give rise to feelings of inferiority on my part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Mark Zaid called it right. It started in January 2017 right after Trump being sworn in as president before a rather small crowd. It began with hundreds of thousands of women flooding the streets of the capital to protest Trump being declared president when he got three and a half million less votes than Hillary. Indeed the coup's publicized crusade has never faltered. The end of the Trump era is now within sight with the results of the elections yesterday around the country. Delaware County that includes Philadelphia elected the full slate of Democratic County Commissioners  ending the Republicans control of the county government that began at the end of the Civil War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:

Yes, Mark Zaid called it right. It started in January 2017 right after Trump being sworn in as president before a rather small crowd. It began with hundreds of thousands of women flooding the streets of the capital to protest Trump being declared president when he got three and a half million less votes than Hillary. Indeed the coup's publicized crusade has never faltered. The end of the Trump era is now within sight with the results of the elections yesterday around the country. Delaware County that includes Philadelphia elected the full slate of Democratic County Commissioners  ending the Republicans control of the county government that began at the end of the Civil War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March

 

I forget, does Mark “S.” Zaid’s middle initial stand for “Single Bullet” or “Sedition”?

Anyway, Mr. Caddy, it’s been almost two years since you were on Dark Journalist, should we be expecting another appearance in the coming weeks?

Your November 30, 2017 appearance was very meta. Quite a busy period for disclosures and all. JFK files, Navy UFO videos. Perfect timing to revisit E. Howard Hunt’s Alien Presence revelations. Like I said, very meta.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/5/2019 at 7:04 PM, Pamela Brown said:

W. Niederhut said: 

  Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA.

Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.  

If the Mayflower descendant New England WASP Bush/Pierce bloodline considered the Kennedy's "vulgar" and  neuveau rich, one can wonder what they think of the initial cheap housing, tax cheating and unsavory perhaps even money laundering character associating wealth acquiring Trump clan and especially the constantly cursing and bragging Donald Trump?

By far the crudest, most vulger, amoral and insecurely self-promoting and self-obsessed President this country has ever seen or heard! *

And one of the least intellectual ( GW wasn't real bright either but he didn't talk like a threatening street thug ) and who personally directed his dark trademark junior high school bully taunts and insults at Jeb Bush himself on 2016 primary national TV ..."you're weak Jeb"... WEAK!    Maybe your mother should be running?

Educated, well read, high plane witty Kennedy versus low brow WWF cursing, trash talking and personally insulting Trump?      HA!

Profiles In Courage JFK versus draft dodging "Pu$$y Grabbing" bragging Trump?

The ultimate "classy versus crude" comparison analogy.

We have our own on stage crazy hyperbole yelling Hulk Hogan in the White House now.

With an accompanying almost daily twitter and/or staged rally insult circus.

It's all a national and even international disgrace and an embarrassment to us all.

And very unfortunately this no respectful proprietaries boundaries president's election reflects the mentality, character and values of half our citizens.

A very sad and even tragic fact.

What say the elitist Bushs about the Kennedys now ... after Trump?

 * End note.

LBJ was as vulgar, crude and amoral, but he at least kept this side of him in a private realm versus the public one.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Joe Bauer
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:

If the Mayflower descendant New England WASP Bush/Pierce bloodline considered the Kennedy's "vulgar" and  neuveau rich, one can wonder what they think of the initial cheap housing, tax cheating and unsavory perhaps even money laundering character associating wealth acquiring Trump clan and especially the constantly cursing and bragging Donald Trump?

By far the crudest, most vulger, amoral and insecurely self-promoting and self-obsessed President this country has ever seen or heard! *

And one of the least intellectual ( GW wasn't real bright either but he didn't talk like a threatening street thug ) and who personally directed his dark trademark junior high school bully taunts and insults at Jeb Bush himself on 2016 primary national TV ..."you're weak Jeb"... WEAK!    Maybe your mother should be running?

Educated, well read, high plane witty Kennedy versus low brow WWF cursing, trash talking and personally insulting Trump?      HA!

Profiles In Courage JFK versus draft dodging "Pu$$y Grabbing" bragging Trump?

The ultimate "classy versus crude" comparison analogy.

The Neanderthal regression comparison is clear here.

We have our own on stage crazy hyperbole yelling Hulk Hogan in the White House now.

With an accompanying almost daily twitter and/or staged rally insult circus.

It's all a national and even international disgrace and an embarrassment to us all.

And very unfortunately this no respectful proprietaries boundaries president's election reflects the mentality, character and values of half our citizens.

A very sad and even tragic fact.

What say the elitist Bush's about the Kennedy's now ... after Trump?

 * End note.

LBJ was as vulgar, crude and amoral, but he at least kept this side of him in private realm versus the public one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Kenneth Drew
Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert:

I think most, if not all, missed the point of the Zaid tweet in relation to my article.  Either that, or they wish to deliberately ignore the implication. 

As I was at pains to show, almost immediately after graduating from a law school that was not exactly as distinguished as Yale, Zaid began to take a rather large part in the JFK community at the rather crucial time of the creation of the ARRB and the beginning of the reaction by the MSM to the furor created by Stone's film. Yet the problem I saw with Zaid was that with almost every article he wrote in Third Decade, with almost every appearance he made at a conference, he tried to sow the seeds of doubt about whether or not our side was right.  In fact, he actually conferred with Posner about certain evidentiary points.  A move that was beyond my field of understanding.

But right after this, after the MSM began to promote Posner's book as the be all and end all of any questions about the Kennedy case, he then sprang up in Washington as part of a large international law firm.  And he begins to work these high level national security cases.  He had just graduated from a place called Albany Law School of Union University.

Zaid then plays a rather questionable role in high profile cases like the Sterling and Kiriakou cases.  Although, IMO, they seem to show him siding with the CIA at the expense of the defendants. Again, that was ignored by virtually everyone.  BTW, he was also involved in the case against Libya over the Lockerbie bombing.  Which today, almost everyone who examined the case thinks he was wrong; it was not Libya that did it. But that lawsuit was part of the crusade that villified Gaddafi. And we know how that ended up don't we. Another issue everyone wishes to ignore.

So now, as many people have written, like Mr. Wheeler, there appears to be a movement to dethrone Trump, which began with the Steele Dossier--which was circulated before he was even elected.  The fact that it was so unsubstantiated Mueller could not use it--what with its golden showers and Trump was being cultivated as a Russian agent back in 1987--that is also ignored.  As are the FBI circles that were around George P and Mr. Flynn.  As is the fact that these guys wanted to use the 25th amendment to remove Trump from office.

And now we have the same Mr. Zaid saying in January of 2017--please note that date, Trump had been in the White House for 11 days--that the "coup has started."  He then adds that impeachment will follow and that CNN will play a strong role in it.  In other words, Zaid somehow could not find any reason for there being an overthrow in the JFK case, but he was with the likes of McCabe and the FBI guys in removing Trump before he even took office.

As I have said, I really did not like Nixon.  I thought he was a criminal from way back.  But I also did not like the fact that America was played like an accordion by the Bradlee/Woodward/Helms/McCord stealth plot that eventually won out.  And it won out because the MSM refused to countenance all the indications of that plot  as it occurred.  Everyone who is concerned about the encroachment of a so called shadow government, should not let that happen again.

Now, Mr. Van Ness will say: geez Jim, I like your posts.  But who the heck cares.  I like Jake Tapper and CNN more. Thus ignoring what Zaid predicted would happen. And what he did in 1993.

Go back to sleep you Lucky Pierre. Wait for Jim Hougan to write his book on this 10 years from now.

Edited by James DiEugenio
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/7/2019 at 7:04 AM, Joe Bauer said:

If the Mayflower descendant New England WASP Bush/Pierce bloodline considered the Kennedy's "vulgar" and  neuveau rich, one can wonder what they think of the initial cheap housing, tax cheating and unsavory perhaps even money laundering character associating wealth acquiring Trump clan and especially the constantly cursing and bragging Donald Trump?

By far the crudest, most vulger, amoral and insecurely self-promoting and self-obsessed President this country has ever seen or heard!

And one of the least intellectual ( GW wasn't real bright either but he didn't talk like a threatening street thug ) and who personally directed his dark trademark junior high school bully taunts and insults at Jeb Bush himself on 2016 primary national TV ..."you're weak Jeb"... WEAK!    Maybe your mother should be running?

Educated, well read, high plane witty Kennedy versus low brow WWF cursing, trash talking and personally insulting Trump?      HA!

Profiles In Courage JFK versus draft dodging "Pu$$y Grabbing" bragging Trump?

The ultimate "classy versus crude" comparison analogy.

The Neanderthal regression comparison is clear here.

We have our own on stage crazy hyperbole yelling Hulk Hogan in the White House now.

With an accompanying almost daily twitter and/or staged rally insult circus.

It's all a national and even international disgrace and an embarrassment to us all.

And very unfortunately this no respectful proprietaries boundaries president's election reflects the mentality, character and values of half our citizens.

A very sad and even tragic fact.

What say the elitist Bush's about the Kennedy's now ... after Trump?

 

 

 

 

 

If I understand what you are saying, the Blue Blooded Bush's considered the Kennedys "vulgar" because they were new money, and recent immigrants, and Catholic.

The Blue Blooded Bush's are now horrified by the exponentially outrageous vulgarity of the Trump family because their money is also new, they are also recent immigrants (none of Trumps grandparents were born in the USA), and at a total disregard for proper "breeding", even allow family members to marry Jews and Slavs. 

 

Edited by Robert Wheeler
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, James DiEugenio said:

So now, as many people have written, like Mr. Wheeler, there appears to be a movement to dethrone Trump, which began with the Steele Dossier--which was circulated before he was even elected.

IMHO the "Deep State" wanted either Bush or Hillary. The DNC clearly railroaded Bernie (I'm not a fan of Bernie's politics but I can sympathize with the anger his supporters felt when they saw how corrupt the nomination process was.) Bush had a weak campaign. As "dumb" as Trump is, I think Trump, or those working behind the scenes for the Trump Campaign, blunted Bush's ability to punch back at Trump. All IMHO, there is tons of dirt on Jeb and the family and the Trump Campaign had it (Gov. of Florida while Epstein was committing all sorts of crimes, for one.)

Unlike most on this forum, I became interested in the JFK Assassination (and RFK, MLK, etc.) after Trump was elected. When I saw what the DNC did to Bernie, and even more brazenly his supporters (essentially taking their $20 donations and giving them to Hillary) and then aggressively trying to get rid of Trump, I looked at the JFK Assassination for historical precedent.

My question originally was; What is so important to a small group of people that they felt the need to shoot a President in broad daylight, and then make all kinds of efforts to cover it up for the next 56 years, including having a guy like Mark Zaid on the payroll.

Quote

As is the fact that these guys wanted to sue the 25th amendment to remove Trump from office.

Bob Mossbacher's daughter was assigned the task of pushing that narrative.

Nixon's "Texas Oilmen" send "Texas Oil Daughter" to say Trump is Deranged

Edited by Robert Wheeler
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...