James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 This guy wants everyone to forget what he did back in 1992. Sorry Dennis, but I did not. It was a disgrace. https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/dennis-breo-the-new-york-times-and-jfk?fbclid=IwAR3E1m0j7wsoh8JfLxKLkHAxv5FKE1dIj4LxII_Q1PrVS5xh6drpy1i1eBw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, James DiEugenio said: This guy wants everyone to forget what he did back in 1992. Sorry Dennis, but I did not. It was a disgrace. https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/dennis-breo-the-new-york-times-and-jfk?fbclid=IwAR3E1m0j7wsoh8JfLxKLkHAxv5FKE1dIj4LxII_Q1PrVS5xh6drpy1i1eBw Dr. George Lundberg's promotion of Dennis Breo's disinformation about the JFK autopsy is also a disgrace, especially since Lundberg, as a pathologist, surely knows better. Lundberg looks like one of the many U.S. academicians (and journalists) who signed "mockingbird" contracts with the Company. Edited November 20, 2019 by W. Niederhut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 William: It was a prostitution of science and knowledge. What made it worse was that neither he nor Breo did any homework at all on the case. They never even talked to Crenshaw. Could Lundberg really not have known that everything in the film JFK about the autopsy was from Finck's testimony just as the film depicted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now