Unanswered Questions For Buell Frazier

[Paul Jolliffe]

On 12/26/2019 at 4:59 PM, Rob Clark said:

1) We don't have to explain it. It's in the photographic record. It was found on the 6th floor of the depository, we have video of it in situ (Aleya), we have photos of it being carried out of the TSBD. Unless of course, as you believe, multiple DPD, FBI, and members of the press conspired to cover up the finding of a rifle that wasn't a Mannlicher Carcano? 

2) I understand there are problems with the provenance of the rifle, but they surely carried one out of the aTSBD on Nov.22, 1963, which means it got there by someone who likely worked there. Unless of course, as you believe, some super sneaky CIA guy or Byrd associate snuck in under the cover of darkness and planted it there.

3) The WC did manage to "do it", whether through illicit or legitimate means, they managed to illustrate "how" he ordered the rifle and paid for it. Is there problems with the evidence? Yes, very much so. But both Marina and George DeM saw the rifle and knew he had it. Marina admits to taking at least one of the backyard photos.  

4) So Marina is lying about the photos, lying about the rifle, lying about the Walker letter, lying about his instructions to her if caught, somebody planted a photo of Walker's house in Oswald's belongings?

5) There are allegations by Garland Slack about Frazier and Oswald being at the gun range together...there's your practicing

6) We can disagree, but your speculation is based on what... Reluctance to believe? Your super huge grand conspiracy theory that has all these macabre forces teaming up together to pull off the old bait and switch is just absurd, and you have no evidence at all to back it up. 

It appears we may be talking at cross purposes here: you and I agree a rifle was carried out of the TSBD on the afternoon of 11/22/63. No one disputes that "a" rifle was found in situ!

Exactly what that rifle was, how it got there, to whom it belonged, etc. are the issues about which we disagree. If you believe (on the basis of zero evidence) that it was "Oswald" who carried it there, that's your perogative. But neither you nor anyone else has the slightest shred of evidence to prove that. (No there were no fingerprints, no there were no eyewitnesses, no there was no paper sack/bag on the sixth floor.) 

Yes, you bet Marina was a xxxx! But don't take my word for it. Read it for yourself.

Straight from the Warren Commission, the very people who so desperately needed her to make the case against her dead husband. This is from Norman Redlich's infamous February 28, 1964 memo to J. Lee Rankin:

 "We cannot ignore, however, that Marina Oswald has repeatedly lied to the Service, the FBI and this Commission on matters which are of vital concern to the people of this country and the world."

https://books.google.com/books?id=ikT8OK5XqY8C&pg=RA1-PA126&lpg=RA1-PA126&dq=norman+redlich+to+j.+lee+rankin+february+28.+1964&source=bl&ots=hDtLnhj4kx&sig=ACfU3U2PMINOxe7f1TqWEt-TFPRWEq_bgg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifp8_s69jmAhVEHM0KHXjEBMoQ6AEwAXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=norman redlich to j. lee rankin february 28. 1964&f=false