Jump to content

The inevitable end result of our last 56 years


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Kirk Gallaway said:

You're not offending me, W. quite the opposite! Just keep in mind "you’re going to lose almost everything you have ever worked for in your life", and "feel like a "real chump" that you didn't  helplessly alarm everybody about their utterly hopeless situation right now!

And by the way, Merry Xmas!!! and the  best of Holiday Wishes!!

ho ho ho!

Thanks, Kirk, and best wishes for you and yours this holiday season, and in the New Year.

I used to sing in a Schola Cantorum, and I recently posted two of my arrangements of old Gregorian Christmas hymns for guitar and two voices on my Soundclick page.   Gregorian polyphony is an oxymoron, but I tried it anyway.

https://www.soundclick.com/music/songInfo.cfm?songID=14352347

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Douglas Caddy

    1778

  • Benjamin Cole

    1605

  • Steve Thomas

    1421

  • W. Niederhut

    1420

A strange parallel:

After 9/11, the federal government began releasing color-coded "terrorism threat levels."

The alert system established five color-coded levels of terrorist threat: green = low; blue = guarded; yellow = elevated; orange = high; red = severe. The presidential directive clearly contemplated that alerts would be accompanied by factual information.

Today we get "Delta" warnings and "Omicron" warnings.  

Has the public health bureaucracy taken a page from the national security state? 

All threats must be amplified? 

This is not to suggest a sinister cabal behind the C19 story. Just the usual bureaucratic aggrandizement in action. 

And why are children being vaccinated? Usually, "risk stratification" dictates who gets vaccinated. Children are at no risk from C19. 

You know, when we talk about  oil companies, we are all aware that they have a fiduciary obligation to maximize profits for shareholders. So we are properly skeptical of oil company proclamations regarding certain topics, and of their lobbying efforts and impacts on public policy. 

But are pharmaceutical companies any different? 

Have the pharmaceutical companies fashioned the Donk messaging-narrative on C19? 

This is a legitimate question.

Edited by Benjamin Cole
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

 

Today we get "Delta" warnings and "Omicron" warnings.  

Has the public health bureaucracy taken a page from the national security state? 

 

- Tremendous amounts of money made from both. 
- Is there any separation between the security state and the health industry? Health DARPA, hello. 
- Don't they call it bio-terrorism?

 

 

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

 

All threats must be amplified? 

 

When you have human beings at a heightened state of fear, constantly, it has the following effects on the populous.
- It paralyses peoples ability to critically think and use logic, people are reduced to the ancient instincts wired into us. 
- People adopt a mob or herd mentality. Clinging to the centre of the herd for safety, think Zebra or pack animals. 
- The state loves a crisis, those who wish to consolidate power do so, while a public are in disarray. 
- Humans who become neurotic from a heightened state of fear, look toward those they view as superior, politicians, the state, god, to fix things for them. 
- Opportunist individuals companies seeking high profits exploit such scenarios. 
- It creates cultural obsession with safety, which fuels sick minds. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

 

This is not to suggest a sinister cabal behind the C19 story. Just the usual bureaucratic aggrandizement in action. 

 

 


- Some believe it's China.
- Some believe it's the "Power Elite" of today. 
- A whole bunch of the public think it's just plain bad luck. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

And why are children being vaccinated? Usually, "risk stratification" dictates who gets vaccinated. Children are at no risk from C19. 


- This is "Mass Psychosis", fear impairing a persons judgement and critical thinking. We have to question the delivery method of such fear and hysteria. It's obviously government and mainstream media, with big tech censoring any rational discussion. It's like nobody has heard of a cost/benefit analysis. 

For further information: See Psychologist Joost Meerloo's writings on Mass Psychosis, or more recently Psychologist Dr Mattias Desmet. Throughout history periodically, societies have seemed under the grip of mental illness, doing unthinkable things. Dostoevsky highlighted this also. Jung called them illusions. 

"The psychic conditions which breed demons are as actively at work as ever..."
Carl Gustav Jung 

“Just as the technological advances of the modern world have refined and perfected the weapons of physical warfare, so the advance in man’s understanding of the manipulation of public opinion have enabled him to refine and perfect the weapons of psychological warfare. . .[and] totalitarian psychological warfare…is an effort to propagandize and hypnotize the world into submission.” 

Joost Meerloo, Rape of the Mind

 

“We can never be sure that a new idea will not seize either upon ourselves or upon our neighbours. We know from modern as well as from ancient history that such ideas are often so strange, indeed so bizarre, that they fly in the face of reason. The fascination which is almost invariably connected with ideas of this sort produces a fanatical obsession, with the result that all dissenters no matter how well-meaning or reasonable they are, get burnt alive . . .or are disposed of in masses.”   

Carl Jung, Psychology and Religion

 

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

You know, when we talk about  oil companies, we are all aware that they have a fiduciary obligation to maximize profits for shareholders. So we are properly skeptical of oil company proclamations regarding certain topics, and of their lobbying efforts and impacts on public policy. 

But are pharmaceutical companies any different? 

Have the pharmaceutical companies fashioned the Donk messaging-narrative on C19? 

This is a legitimate question.


- Firstly, even in that industry, we seem to have abandoned the rationale concept of forbidding cartels and monopolies. 
- We might cast our minds back to our old friend Major General Smedley Butler, who wrote about "War being a racket." 
Media manufactures consent, government acts like they are responding to mass consent, tax payers pay for the war and private corporations pick up the profits. We've seen this play out for the entire time that America has been the empire of our time. The model is almost identical to the war racket, with government taking on a role in marketing. If you're a pharma company, why would you fix this pandemic with a great product, in one go? There is no financial incentive, it would be optimal for them to give jabs for life, every 3 or 6 months. Then as a business it would be even more advantageous to branch out to other jabs, for other illnesses that the media manufactures consent and create waves of fear about. Even better if you can convince a dumbed down population and corrupt politicians to side step the Nuremburg Code, which asserts our bodily autonomy and and right not to be experimented on and mandated medical treatments against our will. 

Bill Gates - A guy who monopolised the computer software industry, making products riddled with flaws and viruses, that needed upgrading very regularly. The same guy monopolises the vaccine industry using his money and influence, even pays $300 million to but PR from news outlets, whilst telling us repeatedly that there is a pandemic coming. Suddenly there is one, a virus, and our immune system needs upgrades very regularly, in perpetuity. Great business model or pure coincidence. 

295108025-quote-Niccolo-Machiavelli-men-

Of course, some of you who are trying to understand the future and where we are doing, keeping a close eye on technological advances and developments, may have cast an eye on 'Transhumanism" and "Technocracy." This pandemic paves the way for these ideas or agendas. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." 

quote-there-are-none-so-blind-as-those-w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a real headline from Newsweek

 

NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE

Millions of Angry, Armed Americans Stand Ready to Seize Power If Trump Loses in 2024

BY DAVID H. FREEDMAN ON 12/20/21 AT 5:00 AM EST
 

What to make of it? The Daily Beast owns Newsweek---the same Daily Beast that savaged JFK-Revisited

Makes you wonder....

Edited by Benjamin Cole
add on
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

Does anyone here ever read Ben or Chris posts anymore?

This is what people do; Ron. They have to attack things that challenge their belief structures. On some level, I see where you are coming from, it's easy for me not to read the tosh from brainwashed political cults. Most people do just desire and echo chamber, or confirmation bias material. 

If you think you're immune to those things, you have a very high opinion of yourself and one that it isn't in unison with some of the greatest thinkers in history. 

But, freedom of choice still exists, any of us can choose to skip reading material for a multitude of reasons. We only have so much time on this planet, It's fully understandable if people don't choose to see reality, or just to indulge in things that bring them pleasures. 

As Orwell said in his final warning; "It's up to you." 

quote-the-greater-our-knowledge-increase

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris Barnard said:

This is what people do; Ron. They have to attack things that challenge their belief structures. On some level, I see where you are coming from, it's easy for me not to read the tosh from brainwashed political cults. Most people do just desire and echo chamber, or confirmation bias material. 

If you think you're immune to those things, you have a very high opinion of yourself and one that it isn't in unison with some of the greatest thinkers in history. 

But, freedom of choice still exists, any of us can choose to skip reading material for a multitude of reasons. We only have so much time on this planet, It's fully understandable if people don't choose to see reality, or just to indulge in things that bring them pleasures. 

As Orwell said in his final warning; "It's up to you." 

quote-the-greater-our-knowledge-increase

Your post are usually much longer, not concise.  This is a debate forum, not a lecture.  Occasional longer informative posts are appreciated.  By me at least.  How we got here from JFK has nothing to do with COVID imho.  The insurrection does.  How did we go from JFK to insurrection? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Ron B-

That is not a polite comment.

Moreover, this forum is concerned with the national security state and media manipulation. 

See the above headline from Newsweek

What is your take on that headline? 

xxxx that headline. 

Your posts are so frequent they become irrelevant and also a distraction.  JFK to here. It was a xxxxing insurrection.  Quit pussyfooting around about it.

Edited by Ron Bulman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

Your post are usually much longer, not concise.  This is a debate forum, not a lecture.  Occasional longer informative posts are appreciated.  By me at least.  How we got here from JFK has nothing to do with COVID imho.  The insurrection does.  How did we go from JFK to insurrection? 

Thanks, Ron. 
 

One one level, in some peoples eyes, everything is linked to the JFKA. 
 

On another level, to other people, everything is only linked to the JFKA tenuously, in an abstract way, or not at all. 
 

On that basis, should this thread exist or not? Because the spectrum of topics is very wide. Can we discriminate? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Matt Allison said:

Newsweek is now owned by an Asian fellow, who has ties to a religious cult.

Print magazines have had a very tough time in the internet age; the former owner of Newsweek was the Washington Post, who gave up on the venture some time ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Newsweek_Daily_Beast_Company

The Daily Beast is linked to Newsweek.

What Newsweek is trying to promote is...breathtaking. 

If you believe Newsweek, then almost any amount of censorship and suppression is warranted. 

The link to JFK? The national security manipulation of the media. 

Recall, The Daily Beast absolutely savaged Oliver Stone's JFK:Revisited.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:

BTW

The author of the above stories, identifying the Daily Beast as a CIA mouthpiece, is Dick Russell. 

Does that name ring a bell? He is the author of a book on Richard Case Nagall, and a JFKA researcher. 

So, Newsweek is a CIA mouthpiece, and prints a headline saying millions of Americans will take up arms if Trump is not re-elected in 2024. 

If you don't think that warrants discussion....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...