Jump to content
The Education Forum

Is anyone interested in Apollo missions...


Jack White
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sorry, made a small error in the title -which is "911 In Plane Site"

Basically, this film posits that flight 93 never did crash. That a bomb scare chased everyone out of an airport (people were not allowed to use their cars, everyone had to flee on foot and armed gunmen surrounded the place), whereupon flight 93 landed, was diverted into a hanger where the people disembarked.

Has anyone seen this?

They make a very compelling case about this plane (which obviously didn't crash in some field), but what i want to follow up on, is: what happened to those people? You empty an airport, you hide the plane from sight, ....but everyone on that plane is supposed to be dead so you can't afford to have any of those people ever show up in public.

Does anyone have any follow-up on this?

Regards,

Randy

Edited by Randy Downs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The leading theory is that the plane was flown by remote control to mid-Atlantic and was deep-sixed.

Less credible are the theories that many of the "passengers" did not exist...just as the

19 arabs did not exist. Those that "did exist" were carefully picked to die for various reasons.

The $1,000,000 hush money given to next-of-kin may be a clue.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Salut Mr. White,

What's eerie is i just thought of that idea, and told my flatmate last night. "The simplest thing to do, would be to drop the plane into the ocean".

Logically, the same thing would have to apply to the supposed plane that hit the Pentagon.

I have documentation on the remote operation of commercial sized aircraft (not just spy drones) which include take off and landing.

Have you seen the video in question, and where did you hear of the (or any) plane being dumped in the ocean?

Regards,

Randy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Salut Mr. White,

What's eerie is i just thought of that idea, and told my flatmate last night. "The simplest thing to do, would be to drop the plane into the ocean".

Logically, the same thing would have to apply to the supposed plane that hit the Pentagon.

I have documentation on the remote operation of commercial sized aircraft (not just spy drones) which include take off and landing.

Have you seen the video in question, and where did you hear of the (or any) plane being dumped in the ocean?

Regards,

Randy

If you check 911 websites, you will find quite a few theories. Yes, I have seen the video

of the remote flying and deliberate crashing of big jetliners.

Thanks.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is correct at all, Jack. I'll show why in the next post.

Randy,

"In Plane Site" is consider by most of the truth movement to be government disinformation, ridiculous propaganda to meant to discredit the truth movement because it is so obviously false.

That will give you some idea of the film's credibility. I watched it once and couldn't keep up with noting down all the errors.

As is apparent, I am a basic "official theory" believer. The one aspect of Flt 93 I am prepared to consider is that the aircraft was shot down by a US fighter, in order to stop it reaching it's intended target, and subsequently the US government does not want that act made public. The facts don't seem to support that theory, but I consider it to be somewhat plausible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check this:

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-t...to-hit-wtc.html

Very persuasive. Killtown has the most comprehensive website on the net re 911.

Jack

Hahahhahahahaha! Stop it, Jack, you're killing me. You are such a comedian. Killclown.... hahahah!

What? You MEANT it?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This video clearly shows WTC 1 suffering a buckling and collapse at the impact site, without the need for any demolitions.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8...41151&q=WTC

Nothing of the sort.

Jack

Then you must be blind. You see the corner buckle inwards and the top collapse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, this so-called fuselage coming through.

If that is a fuselage emerging as a largish object, then where did it go to in the subsequent footage? We don't see anything like it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhXioCl5AjU

On the other hand, if it is part of the engine, then we do see it continue to exit and follow a ballistic trajectory.

I wonder what would happen if we compared the size of the object exiting, as compared to the known size of the fuselage? I believe we'll find that the exiting object does NOT match the size of the fuselage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...