Guest Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said: Just listened to this Joe Rogan interview of Tom O'Neill. What a rotten, lying, no good SOB scumbag Bugliosi was in real life. Yeh, bigtime!!! Horrible guy. Originally I listened to the full length podcast, 3 hours I think. The author was pulling apart the Manson case. It was a great listen and good on him for digging out how Bugliosi was compromised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 The full interview gets deep. Worth watching. The Official Narrative of Tate Murders Doesn't Add Up w/Tom O'Neill | Joe Rogan JRE Clips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denny Zartman Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 I pre-ordered my copy earlier this week, and I look forward to reading your new book, Vince! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Palamara Posted March 20, 2021 Author Share Posted March 20, 2021 12 hours ago, Denny Zartman said: I pre-ordered my copy earlier this week, and I look forward to reading your new book, Vince! Thanks a lot, Denny! The early response has been very, very good!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) I received the book yesterday, Vince, and started reading it. A fine job, thorough and encyclopedic and lively to read, with fascinating documents and photographs as well. I look forward to reading the rest of this major work in the field. Thanks for your kind words on my work and that of other researchers -- you are working in the best scholarly tradition of acknowledging other scholars, which unfortunately is not always the case in this field. Beyond your unrivaled and deep knowledge of the role of the Secret Service -- a truly groundbreaking study that has changed our views of the case and followed Penn Jones's advice to take one area that has not received enough attention and "research the hell out of it" -- you have turned up a great deal of other information and have raised many provocative questions for us to ponder. We won't all agree with everything, but that's part of the scholarly process too. Kudos! Edited March 21, 2021 by Joseph McBride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Palamara Posted March 20, 2021 Author Share Posted March 20, 2021 34 minutes ago, Joseph McBride said: I received the book yesterday, Vince, and started reading it. A fine job, thorough and encyclopedic and lively to read, with fascinating documents and photographs as well. I look forward to reading the rest of this major work in the field. Thanks for your kind words on my work and that of other researchers -- you are working in the best scholarly tradition of acknowledging other scholars, which unfortunately is not always the case in this field. Beyond your unrivaled and deep knowledge of the role of the Secret Service -- a truly groundbreaking study that has changed our views of the case and followed Penn Jones's advice to take one area that has not received enough attention and research the hell out of it -- you have turned up a great deal of other information and have raised many provocative questions for us to ponder. We won't all agree with everything, but that's part of the scholarly process too. Kudos! Thanks so much, Joe---much appreciated! What I am stunned about is what that "LBP" lone-nutter said about the book. He usually leaves scathing 1-star reviews. He was actually kind in his 3-star review...still critical, mind you, but nowhere near as bad as he usually is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denny Zartman Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) Great book, Vince! It's certainly packed with images of documents and extensive footnotes sourcing everything. It sure does feel like the reader is getting their money's worth. One of the things that keeps me endlessly interested in this case is the fact that it seems no matter how many books I read on the subject, I always manage to learn something new. In this case, I was pleased and interested to read some supporting evidence for a theory I had considered but didn't think there was any way of confirming. Page 218 of "Honest Answers" quotes John Armstrong saying that the TSBD electrical panels were on the first floor near the first floor segregated lunchroom, where Oswald was seen and said he was at the time. So, I now feel fairly confident that it's, in my mind, more likely than not that Oswald's role during the operation was to turn the building power off thereby disabling the phones and elevators. For the sake of argument, assuming this could be true, it seems to me to be a slight indicator that possibly Oswald thought he was part of a counter-assassination team. Assuming again that the power and phones were restored within minutes after the assassination and didn't seem to hinder subsequent police activity, cutting the power appears (to me) to be something that could only interfere with an assassination team already in the building. Edited March 23, 2021 by Denny Zartman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Palamara Posted March 24, 2021 Author Share Posted March 24, 2021 10 hours ago, Denny Zartman said: Great book, Vince! It's certainly packed with images of documents and extensive footnotes sourcing everything. It sure does feel like the reader is getting their money's worth. One of the things that keeps me endlessly interested in this case is the fact that it seems no matter how many books I read on the subject, I always manage to learn something new. In this case, I was pleased and interested to read some supporting evidence for a theory I had considered but didn't think there was any way of confirming. Page 218 of "Honest Answers" quotes John Armstrong saying that the TSBD electrical panels were on the first floor near the first floor segregated lunchroom, where Oswald was seen and said he was at the time. So, I now feel fairly confident that it's, in my mind, more likely than not that Oswald's role during the operation was to turn the building power off thereby disabling the phones and elevators. For the sake of argument, assuming this could be true, it seems to me to be a slight indicator that possibly Oswald thought he was part of a counter-assassination team. Assuming again that the power and phones were restored within minutes after the assassination and didn't seem to hinder subsequent police activity, cutting the power appears (to me) to be something that could only interfere with an assassination team already in the building. Thanks a lot, Denny! The reaction has been great so far! No doubt---there is so much that is endlessly fascinating and, in some respects, create more conundrums and seeming contradictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Boylan Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Can't wait to read it. Thanks Vince. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Mellor Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Another copy in the post Vince! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Palamara Posted March 24, 2021 Author Share Posted March 24, 2021 21 hours ago, David Boylan said: Can't wait to read it. Thanks Vince. thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Palamara Posted March 24, 2021 Author Share Posted March 24, 2021 8 hours ago, Pete Mellor said: Another copy in the post Vince! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 That attack review on the book on Amazon is grossly unfair. The guy obviously had some animus toward it ahead of time and unleashed it. I recommend anyone here who likes the book (as I do) post a good review to counterbalance that garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Bacon Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 3 hours ago, Joseph McBride said: That attack review on the book on Amazon is grossly unfair. The guy obviously had some animus toward it ahead of time and unleashed it. I recommend anyone here who likes the book (as I do) post a good review to counterbalance that garbage. Typical Lance wall of words... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Mellor Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 10 hours ago, Joseph McBride said: That attack review on the book on Amazon is grossly unfair. The guy obviously had some animus toward it ahead of time and unleashed it. I recommend anyone here who likes the book (as I do) post a good review to counterbalance that garbage. Yeah, I would love to....however I have the honour of a lifetime ban from book reviews on Amazon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now