Jump to content
The Education Forum

John McAdams has passed on


Josh Cron
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ed Haslam has not, in the years since versions of his book have been available, provided any identification of the Tulane visiting faculty member that presented herself to him as Judyth Vary Baker.

As I've said before: universities build reputations on their visiting faculty, and make records of their residencies.  There would be archived photographs of this professor, or at least suspicious lacunae, for Haslam to present did he care to establish his book's bona fides in at least this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 365
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Ron Bulman said:

Extreme legal action or acquiesce of the Kennedy family, both highly unlikely imho. 

What would "extreme legal action" enatil if somebody could present physical, scientific hard evidence (not just document or witness evidence) against the autopsy findings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
12 hours ago, Micah Mileto said:

Come on, this dude dies and 1 month later his website no longer works? That website was actually useful. I know it's easy to laugh at the prospect of new truth-seekers having to get through McAdams in the search results, but his website was good for some things.

New site address:

JFK / McAdams's Kennedy Assassination Home Page (jfk-assassination.net)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/17/2021 at 10:45 PM, James DiEugenio said:

Richard that is unbelievable.

In the memo that I have there is no qualification to it. Kohn says that Shaw is identical to Bertrand.  Then there is a second source in the memo, who has a digraph code, who says the same thing. Then in the memo, the FBI has printed the name Bertrand under the first paragraph dealing with Shaw's arrest. 

In the real world, Litwin would be laughed out of court. 

 

On 4/17/2021 at 10:45 PM, James DiEugenio said:

Richard that is unbelievable.

In the memo that I have there is no qualification to it. Kohn says that Shaw is identical to Bertrand.  Then there is a second source in the memo, who has a digraph code, who says the same thing. Then in the memo, the FBI has printed the name Bertrand under the first paragraph dealing with Shaw's arrest. 

In the real world, Litwin would be laughed out of court. 

 

On 4/17/2021 at 10:45 PM, James DiEugenio said:

Richard that is unbelievable.

In the memo that I have there is no qualification to it. Kohn says that Shaw is identical to Bertrand.  Then there is a second source in the memo, who has a digraph code, who says the same thing. Then in the memo, the FBI has printed the name Bertrand under the first paragraph dealing with Shaw's arrest. 

In the real world, Litwin would be laughed out of court. 

DSL Note:  Spell check: Its "diagraph", not "digraph"; therefore, correct usage would be "diagraph code" (but which I believe would be redundant," since "diagraph"--in most contexts --implies its already been encoded). Not sure.  DSL

Edited by David Lifton
Getting details right. DSL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...