Micah Mileto Posted December 2, 2021 Posted December 2, 2021 (edited) https://youtu.be/KrNRCxow-Ek I can't believe how much money and effort this guy put into making this video, only to seemingly misunderstand basic aspects of the case. This guy could have made some actual progress, maybe by testing the effects of a 6.5 round fired through plates of artificial bone and gel, but nope, he doesn't even know what the Single Bullet Theory is. Edited December 2, 2021 by Micah Mileto
John Butler Posted December 2, 2021 Posted December 2, 2021 16 hours ago, Micah Mileto said: https://youtu.be/KrNRCxow-Ek I can't believe how much money and effort this guy put into making this video, only to seemingly misunderstand basic aspects of the case. This guy could have made some actual progress, maybe by testing the effects of a 6.5 round fired through plates of artificial bone and gel, but nope, he doesn't even know what the Single Bullet Theory is. He used different rounds also. Not quite the same as what was available in the 60s. How much this would effect his tests I don't know. But, it was better than Dan Rather's years ago test shooting up a log through the center to show that the Carcano round wound not deform that much. I was somewhat surprised by the force of the Carcano round. I wonder whether that was just the effect of water in producing hydrostatic shock rather normal hydrostatic shock from the body of a being or animal.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now