Cory Santos Posted November 6 Posted November 6 (edited) One would expect that forum members should be excited that this fair and free election resulted in RFK, Jr. having great influence under President-elect Trump. As Mr. Kennedy wants the release of all files, one would expect that now some type of release will happen. Considering that under President Biden the records were not going to be released and presumably also if the election result had gone another way, I rather expected more enthusiasm in the forum. Nevertheless, the count down is on. Will the records show anything or be a big nothing? The real election question is who will win if the records are released, lone nutters or conspiracists? Another important question is if the records are released and show nothing either way but affect national security, what precedent will be set regarding releasing records regarding historical events and the impact upon national security-which is a very important issue. This really has serious national implications to carefully consider. Either way, I wonder if the records truly support one side over the other if, like this election, either side would accept the facts and come together. If a clear photo of Oswald in Mexico City, withheld for obvious national security reasons is released or, contra, a photo of him standing near the entrance of the TSBD exists, for example, can one side leave their built in opinions and accept the other side? I hope for America they do. I write this so the forum can monitor and note the updates to whatever does or does not happen regarding the records. One last point, my hope is that this thread will be used for serious, academic, professional discussion and not low level attacks on either side. Edited November 6 by Cory Santos
William Paris Posted November 6 Posted November 6 Also….with RFK Jr being in a new position of influence will that help with the release of Sirhan?
Cory Santos Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 42 minutes ago, William Paris said: Also….with RFK Jr being in a new position of influence will that help with the release of Sirhan? Fair question.
Charles Blackmon Posted November 6 Posted November 6 I hope we start hearing more from Trump about this in the near future. The records need to be released.
Cory Santos Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 1 hour ago, Charles Blackmon said: I hope we start hearing more from Trump about this in the near future. The records need to be released. Charles part of what I want this thread to be about is the historical significance of why people feel the way they do. Can you please explain all of your feelings on why the records need to be released considering what I stated above? Especially, what if the record show nothing but do jeopardize national security? What if RFK Junior looks at the records and agrees that they jeopardize national security and don’t shed any light on the assassination? Would you take his word for it or would you still want them to be released?
W. Niederhut Posted November 6 Posted November 6 (edited) 1 hour ago, Charles Blackmon said: I hope we start hearing more from Trump about this in the near future. The records need to be released. Chuck, My prediction is that Trump might throw his MAGA dupes a very tiny JFKA Records bone, but only after cutting more taxes for himself and his billionaire base, and de-funding Obamacare, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. I noticed that Trump bragged about cutting taxes for the middle class in his televised football game commercials, but, in fact, 80% of his 2017 tax cuts went to the wealthiest 1%. He's a con man. Always was. 80% to the 1%. Trump-ism in a nutshell. Meanwhile, how does Cory feel about Trumpsters calling Hispanic people, "garbage," and the prospect of the corrupt Trump SCOTUS abrogating civil rights for LGBT citizens? Edited November 6 by W. Niederhut
Cory Santos Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 14 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said: Chuck, My prediction is that Trump might throw his MAGA dupes a very tiny JFKA Records bone, but only after cutting more taxes for himself and his billionaire base, and de-funding Obamacare, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. I noticed that Trump bragged about cutting taxes for the middle class in his televised football game commercials, but, in fact, 80% of his 2017 tax cuts went to the wealthiest 1%. He's a con man. Always was. 80% to the 1%. Trump-ism in a nutshell. Meanwhile, how does Cory feel about Trumpsters calling Hispanic people, "garbage," and the prospect of the corrupt Trump SCOTUS abrogating civil rights for LGBT citizens? Can you be professional for five minutes and not hijack a thread?
Benjamin Cole Posted November 6 Posted November 6 1 hour ago, Cory Santos said: Charles part of what I want this thread to be about is the historical significance of why people feel the way they do. Can you please explain all of your feelings on why the records need to be released considering what I stated above? Especially, what if the record show nothing but do jeopardize national security? What if RFK Junior looks at the records and agrees that they jeopardize national security and don’t shed any light on the assassination? Would you take his word for it or would you still want them to be released? Cory Santos--- Thank you for starting a collegial, intelligent thread on the issue of the JFK Records Act.
Cory Santos Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said: Cory Santos--- Thank you for starting a collegial, intelligent thread on the issue of the JFK Records Act. Thank you. It’s unfortunate. Some members feel the need to throw mud every chance they get instead of keeping this a professional forum to talk about the JFK records. I have better things to do and I will simply ignore those type of comments going forward. Edited November 6 by Cory Santos
Benjamin Cole Posted November 6 Posted November 6 1 minute ago, Cory Santos said: Thank you. It’s unfortunate. Some members feel the need to throw mud every chance they get instead of keeping this a professional forum to talk about the JFK records. I have better things to do and I will simply ignore those type of comments going forward. CS- There is an expression: "Casting pearls before swine."
W. Niederhut Posted November 6 Posted November 6 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Cory Santos said: Can you be professional for five minutes and not hijack a thread? Professional, Cory? I'm a retired psychiatrist. Nowadays, I'm mainly interested in treating American MAGA delusions, for free. The problem is that delusional Trumpsters aren't really interested in treatment. As T.S. Eliot said, "Most people can't handle too much reality." Edited November 6 by W. Niederhut
Denny Zartman Posted November 6 Posted November 6 If Trump cared about the JFK records he would have released them when they were due to be released under his watch. Trump doesn't care.
Denny Zartman Posted November 6 Posted November 6 Trump said he would release the JFK records "almost immediately." Those were his words. So how long do we give him? A week? The classic two weeks? A month? Two months? How long until some of us get the green light to say "Told ya so"? And it will be the emptiest victory ever, because everybody here who thinks he's actually going to release these records this time will just shrug and say "Well, we already knew he was a liar." And then they will merrily go on their way.
Cory Santos Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 Just now, Denny Zartman said: Trump said he would release the JFK records "almost immediately." Those were his words. So how long do we give him? A week? The classic two weeks? A month? Two months? How long until some of us get the green light to say "Told ya so"? And it will be the emptiest victory ever, because everybody here who thinks he's actually going to release these records this time will just shrug and say "Well, we already knew he was a liar." And then they will merrily go on their way. If RFK, Jr. reviews the records and says they are not relevant but are a threat to national security and should not be released, will you be okay with them not being released?
W. Niederhut Posted November 6 Posted November 6 4 minutes ago, Cory Santos said: If RFK, Jr. reviews the records and says they are not relevant but are a threat to national security and should not be released, will you be okay with them not being released? Should we take RFK, Jr.'s brainworm, libertinism, and anabolic steroid use into consideration here, Cory? (I ask this as a guy whose former medical school classmate was appointed as Obama's FDA Director.)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now