Denis Morissette Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 15 hours ago, Ron Bulman said: Yes, thank you Kathy and in turn Vince. I don't remember ever seeing this. It is great. In particular I found interesting Craig states again the gun found was a Mauser, in some detail. After having backed off that claim at one point. Lane produces the Weitzman (emphatic) report from 11/23/63, never seen by the WC, in support of Craigs statement. He then produces, was it one or two CIA documents stating the rifle found was a Mauser. I don't remember ever hearing/reading about these. Can anyone else provide more information on them? This is worth re watching, taking a few notes. Thanks for bumping this thread as well Kathy. I want to go back an read the whole thing. Mauser: Craig in this video added the Mauser stamp detail. He did not mention that crucial point in his 1971 manuscript. The Weitzman report was seen and published by the WC. The WC members did not see all the reports, but their staff members did. The CIA document: Who wrote it? And was the author on the 6th floor on 11/22 or did he just read newspapers? What is his source? The author also states that a Selective card was found, which is untrue. Selective cards don't have a photo, it was an obvious fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Morissette Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 Again on the CIA document, remember the CIA was involved in the conspiracy and cover-up. The document states that Lee killed JFK and Tippit, which cannot be true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Frost Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 Craig says that a Mauser was found on the sixth floor of the TSBD. But in 1968, in an interview with the L.A. Free Press, Craig is quoted as saying: "But there was another rifle, a Mauser, found up on the roof of the depository, that afternoon". How many Mausers were there? Free Press article: https://app.box.com/s/n0hkvccua7iczh71h5bp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 (edited) On 9/2/2022 at 3:01 AM, Ron Bulman said: Yes, thank you Kathy and in turn Vince. I don't remember ever seeing this. It is great. In particular I found interesting Craig states again the gun found was a Mauser, in some detail. After having backed off that claim at one point. Lane produces the Weitzman (emphatic) report from 11/23/63, never seen by the WC, in support of Craigs statement. He then produces, was it one or two CIA documents stating the rifle found was a Mauser. I don't remember ever hearing/reading about these. Can anyone else provide more information on them? This is worth re watching, taking a few notes. Thanks for bumping this thread as well Kathy. I want to go back an read the whole thing. Those doc's would be very interesting to find. All I could find is this one alledg. LHO was CIA, well that' s how I read it, or am I wrong ? It's terrible quality... if anyone has a better quality please post, so I can switch it in my files Edited September 9, 2022 by Jean Paul Ceulemans Pictures removed to save space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ulrik Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 9 minutes ago, Jean Paul Ceulemans said: Those doc's would be very interesting to find. All I could find is this one alledg. LHO was CIA, well that' s how I read it, or am I wrong ? It's terrible quality... if anyone has a better quality please post, so I can switch it in my files Hi Jean Paul. That memo is a well-known fake (probably discussed in other threads). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Frost Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 1 minute ago, Mark Ulrik said: Hi Jean Paul. That memo is a well-known fake (probably discussed in other threads). Aww, had me going for a sec. "Once ONI, always ONI" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 17 minutes ago, Mark Ulrik said: Hi Jean Paul. That memo is a well-known fake (probably discussed in other threads). Thanks, I'll look it up. The problem is that there is so much out there... and for everything there is pro and a con to be found... I'm gratefull this forum is here to set things straight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ulrik Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 Supposed CIA memo LHO "was trained by this agency" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Henry Frost said: Aww, had me going for a sec. "Once ONI, always ONI" I was looking in the wrong places it seems... sorry... Edited September 2, 2022 by Jean Paul Ceulemans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 11 minutes ago, Mark Ulrik said: Supposed CIA memo LHO "was trained by this agency" Thanks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Morissette Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 1 hour ago, Henry Frost said: Craig says that a Mauser was found on the sixth floor of the TSBD. But in 1968, in an interview with the L.A. Free Press, Craig is quoted as saying: "But there was another rifle, a Mauser, found up on the roof of the depository, that afternoon". How many Mausers were there? Free Press article: https://app.box.com/s/n0hkvccua7iczh71h5bp The Mauser on the roof mistake comes from Fort Worth Star-Telegram reporter Thayor Waldo. He apologized to the WC for it. Other than what he saw and heard that day, I don't think Craig was much informed on the works of the WC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 I was going through the Belgian newspapers published from 11/22/63 on. It took them over a week before they mentioned Manlicher-Carcano, until that they had called it pretty much everything, from a "Britisch Enfield" to "some Austrian rifle".... They were pretty fast on all the other stuff, but the rifle caused one hell of a confusion. Now, I must admit seeing Weitzman's affidavit (the handwritten and typed version) clearly stating Mauser does make a man think what's going on here... After 11/22 the word "certain" was erased from dictionnaries.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 (edited) On 9/2/2022 at 3:01 AM, Ron Bulman said: Yes, thank you Kathy and in turn Vince. I don't remember ever seeing this. It is great. In particular I found interesting Craig states again the gun found was a Mauser, in some detail. After having backed off that claim at one point. Lane produces the Weitzman (emphatic) report from 11/23/63, never seen by the WC, in support of Craigs statement. He then produces, was it one or two CIA documents stating the rifle found was a Mauser. I don't remember ever hearing/reading about these. Can anyone else provide more information on them? This is worth re watching, taking a few notes. Thanks for bumping this thread as well Kathy. I want to go back an read the whole thing. Here's the doc's he showed, they seem to be a sort press statement or so, don't know, Edited September 9, 2022 by Jean Paul Ceulemans Pictures removed to save space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 Lane says in the video about the above (in short) : recently discovered / upon FOIA request / in CIA files / documents dated 11/25/1963 and 11/28/1963. But the documents show no signature, nothing on from/to,... (at least the parts I can see), so I don't know what to make of it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 (edited) Found something on one of the doc's : Marrs 440. Evica 53. "Information on The Weapon Presumably Used in the Assassination of President Kennedy," CIA document, Nov. 28, 1963 (author's copy showing numbered comments 1-4, 8 and 9, from Jack White collection (created from full document acquired from Mary Ferrell collection). Letter from Jack White to Richard Bartholomew, Oct. 14, 1994. From http://www.whokilledjfk.net/ Edited September 2, 2022 by Jean Paul Ceulemans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now