Adam Wilkinson Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 It has recently come to my attention, that the use of the word ‘hero’ now has no meaning. A hero was once reserved for a person who committed a heroic action, such as running into a burning house to save a life, or diving into surf to save a life etc. but tonight, on Australian television, the word was used to describe a man who ate an onion, he was described as ‘an Australian hero’. Is it just me, or do other members also share my thoughts? I would be interested to know what you all think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher T. George Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 It has recently come to my attention, that the use of the word ‘hero’ now has no meaning. A hero was once reserved for a person who committed a heroic action, such as running into a burning house to save a life, or diving into surf to save a life etc. but tonight, on Australian television, the word was used to describe a man who ate an onion, he was described as ‘an Australian hero’. Is it just me, or do other members also share my thoughts? I would be interested to know what you all think. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hi Adam I do know that in my adoptive country, the United States, members of the armed forces who served in Iraq as well as victims of terrorist actions such as 9/11 seem to be automatically termed as "heroes." Does finding yourself in difficult circumstances make you a hero? I don't think so, unless you showed yourself worthy of the designation by committing heroic acts. You are correct, Adam, the meaning of the term is being devalued. All my best Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now