Len Colby Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 I think Jack is referring to our questioning of King’s non-existent credentials. This is familiar tactic promote the views of someone who back your argument due to their supposed expertise and then when it is shown they aren’t really experts they resort to the ‘argue the facts not the man’ card. That of course has already been done on the previous thread. Duane (IIRC) used a similar tactic on an Apollo thread post the claims of some guy who supposedly had a PHD (IIRC) in physics or astronomy after it was pointed his supposed degrees were probably bogus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 (edited) I think Jack is referring to our questioning of King's non-existent credentials. This is familiar tactic promote the views of someone who back your argument due to their supposed expertise and then when it is shown they aren't really experts they resort to the 'argue the facts not the man' card. That of course has already been done on the previous thread. Duane (IIRC) used a similar tactic on an Apollo thread post the claims of some guy who supposedly had a PHD (IIRC) in physics or astronomy after it was pointed his supposed degrees were probably bogus. ...and just what exactly are YOUR credentials on any matters you expound upon? Also, interesting you chose to bring up Duane [who you, Lamson and Burton [iMO]] conspired to do a 'job' upon and get him forced out of the Forum in frustration (unable to speak or post without permanent moderation)....he just sent me all the information I need to prove he was done in against all the rules and any sense of decency.....I'll post it when the time is ripe. ' I'm speaking just fine on moderation, so what was Duane's problem again??? He left of his own free will and it you have evidence that shows otherwise just post it.... Duane's biggest problem was his ignorance of the subject matter he was attempting to argue. He did himself in. BTW, if Duane wants his info posted here, have him do it himself. He has no valid reason NOT to do it himself. Edited January 15, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Also, interesting you chose to bring up Duane [who you, Lamson and Burton [iMO]] conspired to do a 'job' upon and get him forced out of the Forum in frustration (unable to speak or post without permanent moderation)....he just sent me all the information I need to prove he was done in against all the rules and any sense of decency.....I'll post it when the time is ripe. Please do. This has been discussed ad nauseum and where both John and Andy made the situation quite clear. People have made bogus claims in the past and I would not put it past him to also do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 I believe this photo shows the actual color of Building 6, which some say was black. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 First, look at the first image Jack supplied (Jack has cropped it, possibly for reasons of viewer discretion). The full image is available here: http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/...ion/P200316.jpg A collection of images of the WTC complex. http://manhattan.about.com/od/september11t...-2001/index.htm http://trile.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/worl...d-trade-center/ http://robertdfeinman.com/wtc/images/old_w...rade_plaza2.jpg http://www.september11news.com/WTCPlazaFountain.jpg Please - anyone else but Jack and indeed everyone else - please post if you think that WTC6 was (pre-attack) greyish (or similar, whatever Jack claims) or if it was black (or blackish, as I and others claim). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 First, look at the first image Jack supplied (Jack has cropped it, possibly for reasons of viewer discretion). The full image is available here:http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/...ion/P200316.jpg A collection of images of the WTC complex. http://manhattan.about.com/od/september11t...-2001/index.htm http://trile.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/worl...d-trade-center/ http://robertdfeinman.com/wtc/images/old_w...rade_plaza2.jpg http://www.september11news.com/WTCPlazaFountain.jpg Please - anyone else but Jack and indeed everyone else - please post if you think that WTC6 was (pre-attack) greyish (or similar, whatever Jack claims) or if it was black (or blackish, as I and others claim). Looks black to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Looks black to the majority of people, Matt. I'm wondering if I could contact some people who used to work in the WTC and have them tell us all what colour the building was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted February 13, 2010 Share Posted February 13, 2010 Looks black to the majority of people, Matt.I'm wondering if I could contact some people who used to work in the WTC and have them tell us all what colour the building was. Probably, but I'll bet Jack would think they're all in on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted February 13, 2010 Share Posted February 13, 2010 Looks black to the majority of people, Matt.I'm wondering if I could contact some people who used to work in the WTC and have them tell us all what colour the building was. Probably, but I'll bet Jack would think they're all in on it. And since they were all federal or PANYNJ employees, it was the Customs House, he has a built in reason to dismiss what they say. But of course anyone who disagrees with Jack is "in on it" and/or crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 The exterior of Building Six suffered smoke damage on most of the outside from the explosion and fire. But parts of the outside remained the original gray color. Those who think the building was BLACK "are either in on it or crazy". This is not a adhom on Burton or Colby...just repeating their words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 What downward force pressed this car downward enough to bend the axles, and then flip it upside down? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 True to form you have not listed where the photo was obtained, where it was taken or when. Likely you think none of those matter. Forgive me if I don't agree. However, I would bet that you could get a few reasonable answers and reject them out of hand simply because they don't agree with the predefined conclusions you've already made. So why don't you skip the games and just tell us what you THINK happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 The photo is a frame grab from one of thousands of 911 videos on the internet. It clearly is NOT at the WTC, but no location was given. No debris is seen...just the effect of some powerful force. What YOU or your employers think does not matter. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 I am reminded that you never did get back to me about the airliners that left these peculiar "vapor trails". They were certainly persistent. So am I. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 (edited) The photo is a frame grab from one of thousands of 911 videos on the internet.It clearly is NOT at the WTC, but no location was given. No debris is seen...just the effect of some powerful force. What YOU or your employers think does not matter. Jack Accusation of paid posting noted and reported. General nasty attitude also noted. Any proof I'm paid to post here? What video? If no location is given how do you KNOW it is even in New York? Forgive me if I won't just take your word for it. Do you enjoy playing games Jack? That's what you seem to be doing by avoiding the question I asked. So AGAIN, why don't you skip the games and just tell us what you THINK happened? You see, I really don't know what caused it. I'm just interested in you ACTUALLY GETTING TO THE POINT and telling us what YOU think since it is your pic and post after all. Edited May 20, 2010 by Matthew Lewis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now