Jump to content
The Education Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Question for Charles Drago:

Charles, do you have a copy of your 'warning' (the one that was deleted) and if so (if not you can summarise it's content) would you please forward me a copy via PM or Email please?

Thanks in advance,


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question of the wind direction and thus the direction of the smoke...as it applies to this discussion...spans only the space of just a few seconds. Wind at other times are outside the scope of the question at hand.

Jacks claims that smoke is blowing two different directions in the photos in his study has been shown to be false.

Now the proper thing for him to do is to admit his error and remove his claim.

The proper thing for you to do, as a self-proclaimed truth seeker, is to urge Jack to admit his error and remove his claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 911 "Fetzer silliness" thread is exhaused and does not fit the series of

studies I am working on, so I am starting this new thread on strange

happenings of 9-11. It will mostly be photos, but other strange happenings

may also be included, such as the IMPOSSIBLE cellphone calls from

jetliners flying at 30,000 feet and 500 mph. Add in any strange things

about 911 you think cannot be explained.

Standard laws of physics did not work on that day. Many things happened

which cannot be explained.

Here is a good one. Parts of this mail truck simply evaporated without

a trace. This does not look like a burned vehicle. It looks like a MELTED

truck...which would take INTENSE HEAT, yet parts of the vehicle were

unaffected. This defies known laws of physics.


Link to post
Share on other sites
Charles, I have deleted your post as it contained an attack on Len Colby that you have been told previously not to repeat. Any complaints to John/Andy.

The following was sent to Stephen via PM:


You are ill-informed and out of line.

1. I was NEVER "told" (asked) not to post my warning.

BS - Moderator Kathy Beckett objected to it on the moderation tread started and deleted by Steve Turner

2. "Colby" himself is on record -- via a public post on this Forum -- stating that he has no problem whatsoever with the warning being posted.

I don’t remember ever making such remarks about Drago`s “warning”. I did however request that this rather distasteful post of his not be erased because it put him a much worse light than me.


Accordingly, I am "telling" (asking) you to replace my post immediately.

Irrelevant, even if Drago`s claims were true, a moderator would be in their rights removing, editing or “invisiblising” a post they held to be in breech of the rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

Throwing out accusations is easy, anyone can and several people here do so without regard to providing evidence of their claims. Am I really the Phantom of the Forum like to potray me as or are my detractors full ****?

Dawn wrote:

“I am on record as saying that many good people have left this forum due to the admins always taking the side of the Colby crew.”

Perhaps then you can tell us who some of those “many good people” were and provide evidence they “left this forum due to the admins always taking the side of the Colby crew”

“This is most unfortunate.”

What I find `unfortunate’ is that all too many members of this forum toss out acusations against other members without providing any evidence.

“I do not know what CD wrote…”

Really? How long have you been a members of this forum? You never saw one of his idiotic “warnings”?

“…but I was in agreement with what Jack was posting.”

So you don’t think that “wherever possible, members should give references (books, documents, etc) concerning the comments that they make”? I that case you should take it up with John and tell him that members should be able to make claims here and be under no obligation to provide evidence.

Jack wrote:

“How about Colby's constant attacks?”

Perhaps you can list some of my “constant (personal) attacks” pointing out that you have made numerous gross errors in your claimed area of expertise doesn’t qualify.

“It is odd indeed that provocateurs receive favored treatment and that respected gentlemen like Charles Drago are shown the exit.”

  • As has already been pointed out Drago “left” of his own volition and almost certainly won’t be gone for long. As John pointed out some people like to fake their own deaths to see what people’s reaction will be, Charles it seems likes to fake his own self-exile for the sympathy. I wonder how it will take for the “forum member who cried ‘I quit’ principle to come into effect?
  • I guess Jack forgot about the incidents when I’ve had my posts edited, been given warnings and forced to edit my signature and all the personal attacks against me made by him, Lemkin, Drago, Guyatt etc that resulted in no moderator intervention.

Peter wrote:

“Exactly! Mr. C [via the moderators] is Provacteur General of the Forum - with most every post a slam/provocation/attack/ad-hom/etc.”

I don’t suppose Mr. L is willing to document this claim by taking a representative sample of my posts and showing that “most every post” of mine constitutes “a slam/provocation/attack/ad-hom/etc”

Steve M. - Drago's "warning" can be found here


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Jack are you ever going to get around to giving us a reasonable explanation for you and Fetzer not wanting to post the photo?


- were desperately trying to show that the photo, video and eyewitness evidence that the south façade was damaged was false

- Had just be humiliated by Tink.

But you had that photo and rather than vindicate yourself and provide evidence in support of your claims you sat on it?

Edited by Len Colby
Link to post
Share on other sites
More German engineering.



This is dumb even by truther standards planes carry most of their fuel in their wings and he just demonstrated that the explosion was exactly were we'd expect it. What kind of engineer is this guy supposed to be?

Edited by Len Colby
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't make a poll within the thread, so I have started a new poll. Let me know if you are unhappy with the question and / or choices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

  • Create New...