Len Colby Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 I agree that the pedestal area was most certainly retouched, but not to add the images of Zapruder and Sitzman since they were already depicted, but rather to obscure images of policemen aiming cameras, and who had been located in and around, below on the ground, and to the rear on the pergola. The 'doctoring' was to say the least careless , inasmuch as the original images of Zapruder and Sitzman after being removed, were then 'inked ' back in again, but without due care and attention being paid to the accuracy of their overall depictions. In regard to the Wiegman frames, and in particular to the one used to show that they were not on the pedestal, I have attached the relevant crop below. Spectacular images, Ed ... the clarity just leaves one in awe at what you can do with these assassination images. Bill It looks like the blob Jack insisted was the Pentagon fire station until I proved him wrong. Another "Rorschach" image. Yes, nice image Ed. People with a long track record on photo analysis in the case think it clear...but Len wants to: 1] declare it otherwise - a shapeless blob - from the wannabe expert on anything against the official line. It is an exceptionally clear image....but that would be beyond your ken. 2] make an backhanded attack on Jack (who isn't even involved in the post above). Further, denegration of others in the thread above. Not in the spirit of the Forum rules. 3] make an arrogant and false brag on having proved anyone wrong, here or elsewhere. You convince no one but yourself; impress no one but yourself; make no point here but to disrupt/negate...your same old techniques. For someone self-proclaimed as believing in a conspiracy in Dallas I've never seen you put effort into a solution to it nor reward others for same. Perhaps just a faux position / facade as pretext for all the negativity. Here’s the blob I was referring to. This is an enlargement and crop of a “study" supposedly showing the point of impact (POI)of the Pentagon Jack posted on the linked thread. He placed the “B” to indicate what he identified as the location of the helipad building. It was a point of reference he used to identify the POI. On the next page in post 47 he wrote “Thanks to Colby for providing an updated VDoT frame which shows the error of my initial study.” The point he had initially identified as the helipad (“B”) was several hundred feet north of that structure’s actual location. To honest the blobs don’t look that much alike, their similarity lies in their resolution being way too low to discern anything. People can see in them what they want hence my labelling it a "Rorschach image". I really doubt anybody knowledgeable about photography or even many people who know nothing about photograph would say otherwise. I even suspect Ed may have been joking. I was obviously being jocular if anyone could take offense it would be Ed. You as someone who without provokation labeled two other forum members Nazis and started that provocative thread about me don’t really have much business taking people to task for the "denegration of others" http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...ost&p=78894 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now