Michael Hogan Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 A new article in Rolling Stone http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/104...ection_stolen/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 While it might be difficult to prove the election was stolen, if asked a different way the question might be easier to answer. If the election could be stolen (and needed to be to avoid very possible defeat), would the Bush gang do it? Absolutely. I think the question could be answered affirmatively with any administration nowadays, Democrat or Republican, but with the Bush regime, it's a certainty. So all that needs to be proven is feasibility. All the evidence certainly suggests feasibility, so I suspect it was stolen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ulman Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 While it might be difficult to prove the election was stolen, if asked a different way the question might be easier to answer. If the election could be stolen (and needed to be to avoid very possible defeat), would the Bush gang do it? Absolutely. I think the question could be answered affirmatively with any administration nowadays, Democrat or Republican, but with the Bush regime, it's a certainty. So all that needs to be proven is feasibility. All the evidence certainly suggests feasibility, so I suspect it was stolen. Ron - as usual - another great piece of critical thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 Ron - as usual - another great piece of critical thinking Your and Andy's low opinions of my thinking ability will not deter me from expressing thoughts here, however asinine they may be. You never know, now and then I may something worth consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Heagney Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 Here's a salon.com article that fairly well dissects and chops up Kennedy's assertions. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/...edy/index3.html It seems Kennedy has written his article in the tradition of many CTs: Cherry-picking and deliberate misinterpretation of the data to fit a pre-determined conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted June 4, 2006 Author Share Posted June 4, 2006 David Heagney wrote: It seems Kennedy has written his article in the tradition of many CTs: Cherry-picking and deliberate misinterpretation of the data to fit a pre-determined conclusion. That is the first time I have heard President Bush and his war cabinet referred to as "CTs." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted June 6, 2006 Author Share Posted June 6, 2006 (edited) RFK Jr. replies to Manjoo....and Manjoo answers back. http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/...6/rfk_responds/ Edited June 6, 2006 by Michael Hogan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 (edited) Was the 2004 election stolen? no, Kerry wimped out by refusing to go for the Bush jugular, and as a result the flip flop jibes stuck. 2000 on the other hand was a political mugging of the first order, and whats more done in plain sight of the electorate, followed by more Democrat wimpery. Edited June 8, 2006 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now