Zapruder frame of unknown origin

[Jack White]

I did not see the Jennings special. I do not have a copy of it. Why should I

write letters and make phone calls? I now spend most of my time on more

important things, like the mass murders of 911 and the deceitful moon photos.

Few are as "dedicated" to JFK as "Bill Miller", who spends FULL TIME on it. I do

many other things that are more important. Has "Miller" phoned or written

to ABC? Absurd.

I have spent more than 40 years on JFK. That is sufficient.

Jack

Jack, in your opening illustration at the start of this thread, you mentioned a couple of things about ABC and the unknown origin of their film. I just assumed that you had seen it before citing data concerning it ... my mistake.

Bill Miller

Wrong...I said I was puzzled by the ABC frame. Chris Davidson posted it on

the DellaRosa forum last week, and SAID it was from the Jennings documentary.

So I knew WHERE it came from, even though I had never seen it. THE QUESTION

I ASKED WAS about WHERE ABC OBTAINED THE FILM (go back and read it).

I said I was PUZZLED because I knew of NO source where they obtained

a FILM COPY INCLUDING THE SEPTUM LINES BETWEEN FRAMES AS WELL

AS ADJACENT FRAMES. Do you know or not? Have YOU asked ABC?

Referring me to ABC was a non sequitur...an answer I already knew to

a question I did not ask. The question I asked was WHERE did ABC get the

film? Apparently nobody here knows.

Jack

[Bill Miller]

Wrong...I said I was puzzled by the ABC frame. Chris Davidson posted it on

the DellaRosa forum last week, and SAID it was from the Jennings documentary.

So I knew WHERE it came from, even though I had never seen it. THE QUESTION

I ASKED WAS about WHERE ABC OBTAINED THE FILM (go back and read it).

Jack

Maybe if I word it this way you will get the message ... Did you not think that had you bothered to see the documentary, then maybe you would have known where their copy images came from ... possibly through the credits if nothing else?

Bill Miller

[Jack White]

Wrong...I said I was puzzled by the ABC frame. Chris Davidson posted it on

the DellaRosa forum last week, and SAID it was from the Jennings documentary.

So I knew WHERE it came from, even though I had never seen it. THE QUESTION

I ASKED WAS about WHERE ABC OBTAINED THE FILM (go back and read it).

Jack

Maybe if I word it this way you will get the message ... Did you not think that had you bothered to see the documentary, then maybe you would have known where their copy images came from ... possibly through the credits if nothing else?

Bill Miller

I saw the image only A WEEK AGO. I had NEVER SEEN IT BEFORE. I asked

whether anyone knows WHERE ABC GOT THE FILM. Apparently nobody here,

including Miller, knew about the image. Nobody bothered to try to find out,

but they feel free to attack me for not doing so. Miller need to seek help for

his ailment.

Jack

[Bill Miller]

I saw the image only A WEEK AGO. I had NEVER SEEN IT BEFORE. I asked

whether anyone knows WHERE ABC GOT THE FILM. Apparently nobody here,

including Miller, knew about the image. Nobody bothered to try to find out,

but they feel free to attack me for not doing so. Miller need to seek help for

his ailment.

Jack

Jack, I watched the ABC documentary just as any dedicated JFK researcher, except you, had done.

Bill Miller

[Pat Speer]

I think Jack wins this round, Bill. He asked a relatively innocent question and you jumped all over him. While you may be anticipating Jack's saying the film came from Richard Helms' closet or something equally bizarre, he has not in fact made any such assertions.

Do you know where this film came from? If my understanding is correct, the copies don't have images between the sprocket holes. So where did this one come from? Did someone somewhere figure out a way to copy the images between the sprocket holes along with the film? Or is this the original film before the MPI retouching? I don't pretend to be an expert on the film. Do you find anything odd about this image?

[Jack White]

I saw the image only A WEEK AGO. I had NEVER SEEN IT BEFORE. I asked

whether anyone knows WHERE ABC GOT THE FILM. Apparently nobody here,

including Miller, knew about the image. Nobody bothered to try to find out,

but they feel free to attack me for not doing so. Miller need to seek help for

his ailment.

Jack

Jack, I watched the ABC documentary just as any dedicated JFK researcher, except you, had done.

Bill Miller

I am not dedicated like Miller. When a program billed to feature Meyers, Posner and Mack

comes along, the "conclusion" is foregone. Any documentary which promotes itself as finally

offering the "truth" is suspect. I don't waste my time; I have better things to do.

Is that the same program where Mack positioned "photographers" incorrectly, and he did not protest

when his Badge Man was shown in an incorrect position? (see attachment)

Jack

[Bill Miller]

I am not dedicated like Miller. When a program billed to feature Meyers, Posner and Mack

comes along, the "conclusion" is foregone. Any documentary which promotes itself as finally

offering the "truth" is suspect. I don't waste my time; I have better things to do.

Jack, you are always claiming the same things over Zfilm alteration as if you have discovered the truth.

Is that the same program where Mack positioned "photographers" incorrectly, and he did not protest

when his Badge Man was shown in an incorrect position? (see attachment)

Jack

Jack, your caption speaks about Zapruder being on the pedestal, but yet you also say that Zapruder and Sitzman were not on the pedestal - which is it???

Bill Miller

[Francesca Akhtar]

Dale Meyers and his little cartoon annimation - "proving the SBT true" is probably the most disgusting piece of disinformation filth I have ever seen.

Dawn Meredith

Even more disgusting to me is that the BBC, renowned around the world for its 'solid journalism', chose to buy it and dub it over with one of their former North America correspondants Gavin Esler who claims that 'JFK conspiracy theories don't stand up'. His knowledge of the case is obvious. According to him:

"The fact that they both react at the same time clinches it. So it’s not a magic bullet at all, it’s not even a single bullet theory, in my opinion. It’s a single bullet fact"

How simple.

The full article is here:

http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=40...p;id=1287542003

I know that a few of my fellow DPUK mmbers wrote to him at the BBC pointing out the many mistakes in the programme but naturally never received a reply. Their arrogance is quite breathtaking seeing as how it's 'US' as in the British public who pay their wages in the form of the license fee.