Joseph Adams Milteer

[Paz Marverde]

[Paul Trejo]

12 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

Does Don Adams believe, or do you believe Paul, that JFK was killed from an office building with a high powered rifle? If so, who did the shooting? 

Paul B.,

There was certainly one or more shots from one or more of the TSBD sixth floor windows.

We have plenty of eye-witnesses to confirm that.

A major flaw in the WC report (as admitted by Don Adams) is that we also have plenty of eye-witnesses to confirm that there was certainly one or more shots from the Grassy Knoll.   

Don Adams claims that Lee Harvey Oswald was a carefully selected and manipulated scapegoat for the JFK Assassins.   LHO was selected because he was easy to blame, having lived in the USSR 1960-1962, and brought back a Russian wife, and toyed around with the FPCC in New Orleans.

The JFK Assassins were from the US Radical Right, says former FBI agent Don Adams -- and Willie Somerset told the truth up to the point of the JFK Assassination.

Then -- after J. Edgar Hoover sold LBJ and Earl Warren on the "National Security" necessity to promote a "Lone Shooter" fiction for the JFK Assassination, Willie Somerset went ballistic, and starting saying all sorts of wild things, blaming the Federal Government for killing JFK and so on, so that the FBI had to cut off relations with him.   Willie Somerset knew that the US Radical Right killed JFK, and felt betrayed when the FBI refused to admit it.

Don Adams felt betrayed, also.  His story is incomplete -- like that of Harry Dean --- but he knows what he saw when he saw it.

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

[Paul Trejo]

4 hours ago, Paz Marverde said:

Uhm .. It seems to me there is a sort of taboo here, about the connections between Israel and JFK assassination

Paz,

I don't see any taboo here.   This is a thread about Joseph Milteer.   According to the recent book by Jeff Caufield, namely, General Walker and the Murder of President Kennedy; the Extensive New Evidence of a Radical Right Conspiracy (2015), Joseph Milteer told Willie Somerset that the JFK plot had set the stage to blame Jews for the JFK Assassination.

There were two stages for that:

1. Get Bernie Weissman to put his name on the black-bordered Ad (WELCOME, MISTER KENNEDY, TO DALLAS...) in the DMN

2. Get Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) to kill Lee Harvey Oswald.

In this way, said Joseph Milteer, the US Radical Right could blame the Jews for the JFK Assassination.   ANYTHING to get the spotlight off of the Radical Right.

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

[Paz Marverde]

5 minutes ago, Paul Trejo said:

According to the recent book by Jeff Caufield

Did you read the article I posted, Paul Trejo? Did you watch the documentary I posted? 

[Paz Marverde]

https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-reviews/caufield-jeffrey-h-m-d-general-walker-and-the-murder-of-president-kennedy

"If the reader is interested in knowledge about the inner workings of the radical right back in the fifties or sixties, then this is a useful book. But as far as relating that group to the murder of JFK, it is simply a dud. And a pretentious, bombastic, overlong and tedious dud at that. In this reviewer’s opinion, it is the worst book on the JFK case since Ultimate Sacrifice, concludes Jim DiEugenio."

[Paul Trejo]

22 minutes ago, Paz Marverde said:

https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-reviews/caufield-jeffrey-h-m-d-general-walker-and-the-murder-of-president-kennedy

"If the reader is interested in knowledge about the inner workings of the radical right back in the fifties or sixties, then this is a useful book. But as far as relating that group to the murder of JFK, it is simply a dud. And a pretentious, bombastic, overlong and tedious dud at that. In this reviewer’s opinion, it is the worst book on the JFK case since Ultimate Sacrifice, concludes Jim DiEugenio."

Paz,

James DiEugenio is a biased reviewer.  His CIA-did-it CT is already 50 years old, and has solved NOTHING.   He's jealous of Jeff Caufield, and it shows in his biased review.

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

Edited December 28, 2017 by Paul Trejo
typo

[Paz Marverde]

1 minute ago, Paul Trejo said:

James Di Eugenio is a biased reviewer

Jim DiEugenio (write his name the RIGHT way, please) is my friend, and he is an extremely skilled researcher. You, instead, have the attitude of not respecting this forum rules

[Paul Trejo]

11 hours ago, Cory Santos said:

I was waiting to see if anyone would mention S.A. Adams.  After reading the prior posts, some of which frankly were unprofessional, I think the Adams video is where you should start John.  As Paul correctly noted, it was S.A. Adams who was chasing Milteer and trying to find his whereabouts. 

As for opinions as to whether it looks like him or not, frankly, as I stated in my JFK assassination lecture last year, who cares?  It is your opinion.

If you want to prove it, hire an expert with facial recognition software and see if they can get a match. 

Personal non-expert opinions are worthless.  There seems to be too many Ipse Dixit opinions regarding the assassination and this is a great example of such.

I actually think there is a great deal of interest in Milteer, especially considering the circles he ran in which had overlap with New Orleans.

If he was in Dallas, that would be 100 percent proof of a conspiracy based on his prior statements.  What is strange however is if it was a conspiracy, how could they have let the recording become public?  Clearly the FBI knew about him and his statements so it seems strange that if members of the organization were involved in a conspiracy that they would allow that.  But, then again, I am sure if there was a conspiracy, the conspirators thought the Zapruder film would not become public.

So John, to answer your question, the Milteer issue is very interesting and a "strange coincidence" that I feel leans towards more than just a coincidence.  Hope that helps.

Cory,

I agree that personal, non-expert opinions tend to be worthless when it comes to photographic matches.   

FBI special agent Don Adams, however, was an expert.  It was Don Adams who first identified Joseph Milteer in Dealey Plaza photos taken during the JFK Assassination.   (These are the same photos that Kirk Gallaway has shared with this thread).

Why did the Milteer recordings become public?   Because the FBI was not a part of the JFK Assassination plot, that's why.   Also, the FBI's "Lone Shooter" theory, promoted by the US Government due to "National Security" concerns, was already so well-ingrained in the public discourse, that nobody was going to take Joseph Milteer or Willie Somerset seriously anymore.   So, it was a moot point.

Same with the Zapruder film -- or so the FBI thought.

I agree fully with your quasi-legal opinion about Joseph Milteer here, Cory, namely, that, "If he was in Dallas, that would be 100 percent proof of a conspiracy based on his prior statements."

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

Edited December 28, 2017 by Paul Trejo

[Joe Bauer]

It seems the main reference source for downplaying if not completely dismissing the Joseph Milteer story was ( or still is ) John McAdams's website essay, where he conjures up a laughably weak critique of other author's takes on Milteer being someone of interest in the JFK assassination.

Like Vincent Bugliosi, John McAdams loves to repeatedly intersperse emotionally unbalanced suggesting adjectives such as Whacky, Crack Pot, Bizarre, etc. in his JFK CT debunking pieces.

They're all a bunch of Loonies!

This type of extremely juvenile derogatorily suggestive labeling of anyone claiming something these two don't believe actually hurts, downgrades and deflates their own presentations.

It's a clear exposing of "their own debate argument insecurities" when they feel the need to divert to immaturely inserting common psychological fear projection pictures into the minds of their readers thinking this somehow bolsters their debate presentations versus their adversaries.

But this silly tactic doesn't work with rational thinking and even half-way intelligent and informed people regards the subject at hand.

Unfortunately, this does work with millions of others who are not well informed or inclined to be such and who are more susceptible to this kind of emotional fear projection game.

No one can argue the content of the November 13th, 1963 Miami police surveillance tape of Joseph Milteer and police informant Willie Somersett.  It is what it is. 

And Jim Marrs' description of Milteer as the "Miami Profit" because of this tape says it all.

Milteer's predictions of what takes place just 11 days later in Dallas, Texas are so specific in all the major details that to dismiss them as nothing is simply illogical.

 

 

Edited December 28, 2017 by Joe Bauer

[David Boylan]

2 hours ago, Paz Marverde said:

Echevarria was associated with Paulino Sierra. Sierra was visited by Burt Mold and John Lechner and asked to form a Government in Exile (JGCE). They represented themselves as having Jake Lansky as their primary financial backer. This is where this reference came in.

[Paul Trejo]

20 hours ago, David Boylan said:

Echevarria was associated with Paulino Sierra. Sierra was visited by Burt Mold and John Lechner and asked to form a Government in Exile (JGCE). They represented themselves as having Jake Lansky as their primary financial backer. This is where this reference came in.

David,

Thanks very much for this well-researched clarification of the historical data.    The following is my opinion:

It is remarkable that even in 1963, the specific reference to a person's Jewish heritage tended to be highlighted in almost any discourse about them.

For example, take Bernie Weissman, and Jack Ruby (Rubenstein).   According to Joseph Milteer, their participation in the JFK saga showed that "a Jew started the JFK Assassination with the Dallas Morning News full page, black-bordered advertisement, and a Jew finished the JFK Assassination with the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald."   [Source: Jeff Caufield (2015)]

Bernie Weissman reported receiving Anti-Semitic hate mail from that PO Box he broadcast in that DMN Ad, long after the JFK murder.  

Also, DPD Chief Jesse Curry insisted upon using the name, "Jack Rubenstein" in public events -- and Curry pronounced the name slowly for his fellow Gentile majority.  The Anti-Semitic implications were obvious.

Legally, the name was "Jack Ruby."

We beheld insinuations from the US Radical Right in 1963 that echoed the 1939 German Nazi ideology, specifically, that Communism was Jewish, and that all Jews were Communists.  

The implicit conclusions were: "so the Jews killed JFK -- so the Communists killed JFK -- so let's go invade Cuba right away!"

Any excuse for a Radical Right response.   

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

Edited December 29, 2017 by Paul Trejo
typos