Brendan Slattery Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Delicious. http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 (edited) Delicious.http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/ Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed. Edited October 14, 2006 by Shanet Clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 (edited) O'Reilly is an asshole jerk who never served in the military, while Fetzer was a Marine Corps officer in Vietnam. O'Reilly called Fetzer a TRAITOR, but it is Fetzer who is a true hero and O'Reilly a coward. O'Reilly shouted, screamed and became nearly apoplectic while repeating several times YOU ARE NUTS, while showing a vast lack of information about 911. Fetzer remained calm and tried to present facts between O'Reilly's rude rants. O'Reilly showed himself to be a rude, ignorant, asshole jerk, while Fetzer comported himself with calm class. Naturally everyone here understands why Slattery worships O'Reilly. Two peas from the same pod. Jack Edited October 14, 2006 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Slattery Posted October 14, 2006 Author Share Posted October 14, 2006 O'Reilly is an asshole jerk who never served in the military, whileFetzer was a Marine Corps officer in Vietnam. O'Reilly called Fetzer a TRAITOR, but it is Fetzer who is a true hero and O'Reilly a coward. O'Reilly shouted, screamed and became nearly apoplectic while repeating several times YOU ARE NUTS, while showing a vast lack of information about 911. Fetzer remained calm and tried to present facts between O'Reilly's rude rants. O'Reilly showed himself to be a rude, ignorant, asshole jerk, while Fetzer comported himself with calm class. Naturally everyone here understands why Slattery worships O'Reilly. Two peas from the same pod. Jack Well, you hate this country too, Jack, so you and Fetz can spoon to your heart's content. Accusing the Prez of murdering 3,000 innocent people is indicative of "calm class"? And you think this reflects well on the Marine Corps? What is his idea of "experts"? Those pimple-popping twits from Loose Change? Hilarious. Thankfully, I know an asshole when I see one (or read their posts). Just remember folks: you won't read any of Fetz's shocking revelations in the Bush-hating NY Times or Nation magazine because they're influenced by the evil gum'mint! LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Delicious. http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/ Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed. You are right, Shanet. A makeover would do wonders for his self-esteem. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Slattery Posted October 14, 2006 Author Share Posted October 14, 2006 Delicious. http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/ Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed. You are right, Shanet. A makeover would do wonders for his self-esteem. Jack Jack's just jealous 'cause I'm gonna outlive him by 40 years ... and do a little dance on his grave. Thanks for the craven Nazi smear. It's been awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Crane Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Jack White has just slapped the "correct" silly. *Correct = I agree with the poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Black Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 I feel that it is well accepted across the U.S. by all but the neo cons, and those too young, too lazy or too immature to seek out the truth, that watching Fox News or Bill Oreilly is openly inviting oneself to be manipulated. I feel that Bill and the Fox Network are extensions of the present U.S. administration and the mere mention of them as an authorative source of truth, self defines one as a member of the "flock" ! On this or any other JFK investigative forum, using Fox as corroboration carries as much weight as using the conclusions of the W.C. Report. The mere mention of this class of "reporting" as having meaningful significance, "brands" the poster before another word is read ! Charlie Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Another sad victim of inter ocular envy : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 I quit watching O'Reilly, Hannity, and FoxNews a long time ago, but thanks for the update. Nothing has changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 (edited) O’Reilly Sicks FBI on Fetzer, Barrett Friday October 13th 2006, 7:33 pm Bill O’Reilly, the scurrilous “phone sex” deviant and prime time bully, wants nine eleven researchers and investigators arrested—or, more accurately under the so-called detainee bill, disappeared into Gestapo torture dungeons—and presumably brought up on treason charges, marched before a secret military tribunal, and sent to the gallows. O’Reilly did not say as much when he abused and talked over Jim Fetzer last night, characterizing him as a “disgrace” to the country for not buying lock, stock, and barrel the official Grimm Brothers fairy tale version of events of what did and did not happen on September 11, 2001. Not only did the reprehensible O’Reilly, who had the academic Dr. Sami al-Arian arrested and charged as a terrorist, slander Fetzer and by extension anybody else who questions the government, he also demanded Fetzer be tailed by the FBI. “I’d put the FBI on you and that nutty [professor Kevin] Barrett and find out what the hell you guys are up to,” threatened O’Reilly, basically insinuating that scholarly research is a crime, as of course “everything changed” after nine eleven, including the right to exercise the First Amendment. But then, as we know, or some of us know, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are now effectively dead and, increasingly, it is a crime to question the government, especially in an academic setting, same as it was after the Nazis took over in Germany. would appear O’Reilly’s latest temper tantrum is part of a concerted effort to demonize those who “hate their country” (i.e., have the gall to ask questions) because they are unable to accept the officially sanctioned fairy tale stipulating without evidence that a few Muslim cave dwellers—one with a documented past linked to the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI and others trained on U.S. military bases—made NORAD stand down with boxcutters. Last month, the unitary decider, in a speech at the Capital Hilton Hotel, cited a White House strategy paper that insists “[t]errorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories.” Is it possible Fetzer may soon be considered a terrorist recruiter for dispensing “falsehoods … corrupted by conspiracy theories,” that is to say information at variance with the official fairy tale? It will be if Bill O’Reilly has his way. “In late September 2001, al-Arian was invited to be a guest on The O’Reilly Factor,” explains Democracy Now. “Al-Arian thought he was going to be discussing Arab-American reactions to the attacks. Instead, host Bill O’Reilly went on a tirade against him, basically accusing al-Arian of supporting terrorism and terrorist groups. O’Reilly dug up comments al-Arian had made 15 years earlier and suggested that he should be followed everywhere he went [by the CIA]. All of this on live international television and just weeks after the 9-eleven attacks.” The FBI and Joint Terrorism task Force raided the home of Sami al-Arian early on the morning of February 20, 2003, slapped him in handcuffs as his family looked on in horror, and dragged him off to a federal dungeon. Of course, as al-Arian is not a terrorist, the government is unable to make charges stick against him, although, as is usually the case in such highly touted “terrorism” cases, al-Arian was forced to plea to a lesser charge and will be deported “to another country,” no doubt one where he will be regarded with suspicion. In short, the Justice Department and Bill O’Reilly ruined Sami al-Arian’s life—but then fascists are experts at such destructive behavior. As the government has a keen interest in shutting down the nine eleven truth movement, especially now as it continues to gain visibility, there is a distinct possibility Jim Fetzer and other prominent researchers and academics will be arrested in the wee hours of the night. Bill O’Reilly has once again sounded the clarion call, demanding the feds take out Fetzer, Kevin Barrett, and anybody else who stands in the way of the neocon master plan to turn America into the equivalent of Germany under Hitler or Russia under Stalin. In a way, however, Sami al-Arian was lucky, as habeas corpus still existed when he had his day in court. If the government determines nine eleven researchers and other “conspiracy theorists” are terrorist recruiters, we can expect select personalities from the nine eleven truth movement—as fractured and factionalized as it is (and riddled with COINTELPRO agents) and thus ineffectual to a large degree—to disappear into the night, hustled off by the American version of the Geheime Staatspolizei, our very own state secret police. http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=604 O'Reilly needs to get back on his meds....before he completely dissolves one night on his program, with all his favorite viewers watching, and what would they do, why they would applaud..That's what they are waiting for......after all that is the mentality of his audience...imo..... ******************************************** The Majority is no longer buying........... Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence October 14, 2006 Many adults in the United States believe the current federal government has not been completely forthcoming on the issue of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 53 per cent of respondents think the Bush administration is hiding something, and 28 per cent believe it is lying. Only 16 per cent of respondents say the government headed by U.S. president George W. Bush is telling the truth on what it knew prior to the terrorist attacks, down five points since May 2002. Al-Qaeda operatives hijacked and crashed four airplanes in the U.S. on Sept. 11, 2001, killing nearly 3,000 people. In October, after Afghanistan’s Taliban regime refused to hand over al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the U.S. launched the war on terrorism. On Aug. 6, 2001, a Presidential Daily Briefing titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." mentioned "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York." On May 17, 2002, Bush discussed the situation, saying, "The American people know this about me, and my national security team, and my administration: Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to kill on that fateful morning, I would have done everything in my power to protect the American people." On Sept. 11, Bush referred to the attacks, saying, "Five years after 9/11, our enemies have not succeeded in launching another attack on our soil, but they’ve not been idle. Al-Qaeda and those inspired by its hateful ideology have carried out terrorist attacks in more than two dozen nations. And just last month, they were foiled in a plot to blow up passenger planes headed for the United States. They remain determined to attack America and kill our citizens—and we are determined to stop them." Polling Data When it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States, do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying? ............................................... Oct. 2006...................May 2002 .................Telling the truth.............16%......................21% .................Hiding something...........53%.......................65% ..................Mostly lying..................28%.......................8% ..................Not sure.........................3%.......................6% Source: The New York Times / CBS News Methodology: Telephone interviews with 983 American adults, conducted from Oct. 5 to Oct. 8, 2006. Margin of error is 4 per cent http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/...em/itemID/13469 B.. Edited October 15, 2006 by Bernice Moore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Smith Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 O'Reilly really showed Fetzer up. He sure did. He nailed him with the hard facts, and methodically refuted all of Fetzer's claims.......oh, that's right, O'Reilly just called him names, said he hates America, believes that space aliens kidnapped Elvis, and rudely talked over him whenever he tried to say something. I guess Bill O'Reilly really is an impotent big mouth after all. He has nothing of relevance or import to say, so instead spews his noxious brand of bargain basement jingoism as compensation. Man, I almost forgot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 I think the O'Reilly hijinks will backfire. While I don't subscribe to the 9/11 hoax theory, O'Reilly's behavior was abominable. If Clinton looked foolish for getting mad on TV, O'Reilly looked twice as foolish. He made Dr. Fetzer, not always the coolest of cucumbers, appear quite reasonable. Perhaps his actions will help Dr. Fetzer get the attention of other scientists, and maybe some real answers can be provided for his questions. O'Reilly's "you're a traitor for questioning the moral integrity of the President" is a sham and most everyone knows it. After all, he and his pack of liars accused Clinton of going after Bin Laden to cover up that he'd received oral sex from a young woman, and then had the nerve to ask him why he didn't do more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Slattery Posted October 15, 2006 Author Share Posted October 15, 2006 (edited) "O'Reilly was rude to a certifiable nut! How dare he!" Um, you have watched his show before, right? Fetzer knew he wasn't there to play pattycake. Fetz is leveling some pretty serious charges, and O'Reilly cross-examined him quite devastatingly. The ex-professor did nothing but stammer, plug his website, and fade into a catatonic trance when challenged. It was almost as good as Groden on the witness stand in the OJ civil suit. That's what happens to the nuts when they leave their comfort zones. They fall apart under the weight of their own hubris. Nor is it particularly libelous to describe Fetz as an "anti-American loon." Why is it so hard to believe that there are Islamic jihadists in the world who wish the US and the West nothing but death and destruction? Edited October 15, 2006 by Brendan Slattery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Another sad victim of inter-ocular envy, a rare form of penis envy : Bill O' Reilly is not a reputable source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now