Chris Davidson Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down. Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 It's a team of gymnasts, Chris. The others, suspended by wire on the cupola wall in front of the 'windows', are synchronised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris Very good, Chris...it is right in the Badgeman area...movement certainly. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris ________________________________________________ Fascinating capture, Chris. Damn. Does anyone know how many seconds this is after Z313? Thanks, --Thomas ________________________________________________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 (edited) Hey Joe, get down. _______________________________________ "Hey Joe, where ya goin' with that gun in your hand?" Hey Joe-- Jimi Hendrix _______________________________________ Edited January 31, 2007 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 (edited) Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris Edited January 31, 2007 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 (edited) Edited: DOUBLE POST. Edited January 31, 2007 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris The camera movement has bent the sunspots on the shelter wall between frames. This has given off the illusion of movement. Look to the right of the box in your clip and watch the same thing happen to the illuminated parts of the colonnade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris Personally, I find James Altgen's camera bag of considerably more interest as it gives us a second & cross-view of some important positions of individuals. http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z344.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 31, 2007 Author Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hey Joe, get down.Why? Nix might get you on film. Don't worry about it, we'll just say it's lights and shadows. OK. Keep doing your pushups. RIGHT chris The camera movement has bent the sunspots on the shelter wall between frames. This has given off the illusion of movement. Look to the right of the box in your clip and watch the same thing happen to the illuminated parts of the colonnade. I'm sorry, I should have compared it to another version. Let's take a look at both. Oops, my guy moves in the opposite direction as the sunspots do. O.K. Let's also take a look at a woman in the audience. She's running so quickly, her arm is falling off. This is a few frames before my guy Joe ducks for cover. What a coincidence. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 (edited) I'm sorry,I should have compared it to another version. Let's take a look at both. Oops, my guy moves in the opposite direction as the sunspots do. I think the sunspots bend in the same manner. One such place that I didn't mark can be seen directly beow the two red arrows on the right side of the frame. The faint sunspot moves in correlation with the other sunspot ... all occurring about 45 seconds after the shooting. Edited June 18, 2007 by Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 31, 2007 Author Share Posted January 31, 2007 (edited) I'm sorry,I should have compared it to another version. Let's take a look at both. Oops, my guy moves in the opposite direction as the sunspots do. I think the sunspots bend in the same manner. What direction do the sunspots move in Groden's version? 2 different films, same spot moves in opposite directions. And for those interested, here's another version of our running lady and that incredible arm and sliding sleeve. Or is it glare from the tire rim. I'm a little confused. chris Edited January 31, 2007 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 And for those interested, here's another version of our running lady and that incredible arm and sliding sleeve.Or is it glare from the tire rim. I'm a little confused. chris Chris, there really is no confusion. Look at her right hand. It *appears* at the same time her left arm *disappears* -- and this happens because she is running. Her arms are moving as she moves. Don't you think so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 (edited) Chris, there really is no confusion. Look at her right hand. It *appears* at the same time her left arm *disappears* -- and this happens because she is running. Her arms are moving as she moves. Don't you think so? .................. And her upper body is twisting to her right slightly. In the Lancer archives somewhere there should be some pretty good stabilized images shpowing he sunspots being bent in the Groden images. The title of the thread was under 'Classic Gunman' as I recall. BTW, I hope she isn't running in high heels! Edited February 1, 2007 by Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Chris, there really is no confusion. Look at her right hand. It *appears* at the same time her left arm *disappears* -- and this happens because she is running. Her arms are moving as she moves. Don't you think so? .................. And her upper body is twisting to her right slightly. In the Lancer archives somewhere there should be some pretty good stabilized images shpowing he sunspots being bent in the Groden images. The title of the thread was under 'Classic Gunman' as I recall. BTW, I hope she isn't running in high heels! Chris, I gave this topic a bump because I'm curious - do you still see her arm disappear? Or do you buy the explanation that she simply moved it as she ran? Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now