Jack White Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 (edited) A Dallas attorney has been corresponding with Fetzer, Costella and me after he recently became curious about the rain sensors and washers John reported. He had just recently read TGZFH. Today he went down to the plaza with his digital camera and took lots of photos and sent them. They showed... 1. The washers were as before. 2. ALL OF THE "RAIN SENSORS" HAD BEEN REMOVED. 3. The "Airport" sign was replaced in a slightly different location with slightly different graphics, for no apparent reason. The new sign had no rain sensor on back like the old one. 4. Lampposts shown in new photos were all repainted. 5. The LAMPPOST BY THE AIRPORT SIGN WAS REPLACED WITH A SHORTER ONE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION for no apparent reason. So why were the "rain sensors" removed? It still rains in the plaza. Why was a perfectly good sign replaced by a slightly different one in a slightly different location? Why was a perfectly good lamppost replaced by a shorter one in a different location? Why repaint lampposts that did not need it? Is it in the taxpayers' interest to keep making continuous alterations to the plaza? Or is it in someone's interest to try to keep making things difficult for photo researchers? If I could post photos, I would show you the renovations. Jack Edited February 18, 2007 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 A Dallas attorney has been corresponding with Fetzer, Costella and me afterhe recently became curious about the rain sensors and washers John reported. He had just recently read TGZFH. Today he went down to the plaza with his digital camera and took lots of photos and sent them. They showed... 1. The washers were as before. 2. ALL OF THE "RAIN SENSORS" HAD BEEN REMOVED. 3. The "Airport" sign was replaced in a slightly different location with slightly different graphics, for no apparent reason. The new sign had no rain sensor on back like the old one. 4. Lampposts shown in new photos were all repainted. 5. The LAMPPOST BY THE AIRPORT SIGN WAS REPLACED WITH A SHORTER ONE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION for no apparent reason. So why were the "rain sensors" removed? It still rains in the plaza. Why was a perfectly good sign replaced by a slightly different one in a slightly different location? Why was a perfectly good lamppost replaced by a shorter one in a different location? Why repaint lampposts that did not need it? Is it in the taxpayers' interest to keep making continuous alterations to the plaza? Or is it in someone's interest to try to keep making things difficult for photo researchers? If I could post photos, I would show you the renovations. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 (edited) A Dallas attorney has been corresponding with Fetzer, Costella and me afterhe recently became curious about the rain sensors and washers John reported. He had just recently read TGZFH. Today he went down to the plaza with his digital camera and took lots of photos and sent them. They showed... 1. The washers were as before. 2. ALL OF THE "RAIN SENSORS" HAD BEEN REMOVED. 3. The "Airport" sign was replaced in a slightly different location with slightly different graphics, for no apparent reason. The new sign had no rain sensor on back like the old one. 4. Lampposts shown in new photos were all repainted. 5. The LAMPPOST BY THE AIRPORT SIGN WAS REPLACED WITH A SHORTER ONE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION for no apparent reason. So why were the "rain sensors" removed? It still rains in the plaza. Why was a perfectly good sign replaced by a slightly different one in a slightly different location? Why was a perfectly good lamppost replaced by a shorter one in a different location? Why repaint lampposts that did not need it? Is it in the taxpayers' interest to keep making continuous alterations to the plaza? Or is it in someone's interest to try to keep making things difficult for photo researchers? If I could post photos, I would show you the renovations. Jack ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Was that a "dead horse" or (deleted)? Edited February 20, 2007 by Kathy Beckett derogatory remark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 (edited) Lets go with dead horse.... Edited February 18, 2007 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 18, 2007 Author Share Posted February 18, 2007 I thought the "moderators" were to address such crap as this. How does such drivel advance research? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now