Cliff Varnell Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 (edited) I suppose that many of you have "speculated" as have I, regarding the "timing" of this NEW FIND.I take this to be a media sneak preview of what Mr. Bugliosi will no doubt "heavily" weigh on, in his 1600 page forthcoming book, which shall prove to all, the validity of the Warren Report; except possibly for its few insignificant and honest errors. It has begun ! We will be led down those same worn out paths, the purpose of which is to further ensnare the research community in those very time consuming re re re-discussions. Since the only seeming "evidentiary" value of this film seems to be once again "coat bunching".....I cannot fail to wholeheartedly believe that a major point in Bugliosi's work will have to do with this so called "bunching". Many more thousands of pages and millions of words and hours will be wasted on a "not even new TANGENT" that can absolutely prove nothing other than it can waste more time. Time is the conspiracy's greatest ally, and the wasting of researchers time on insignificant matters, is their time proven method. Why will it not work again? We continue to make the exact same mistakes and bewilderingly wonder why we come up with the same answers. According to Jim Marrs this "insignificant" matter of the holes in the clothes is the single most important piece of evidence in the case. Gaeton Fonzi has also endorsed the holes in the clothes as key to demolishing the Lone Nut theory (THE LAST INVESTIGATION.) Ditto Noel Twyman in BLOODY TREASON. Meanwhile, Gerald Posner claims that the Jefferies film on Main St. shows the jacket in the precise location required to reconcile the holes in the clothes with the SBT in-shoot 3 inches higher. Note the jacket rode over the top of the shirt collar. http://video.jfk.org/George_Jefferies_film.wmv But the Towner film images on Elm St. -- taken within 5 seconds of the shooting -- clearly show the shirt collar at the back of JFK's neck. http://www.jfk-online.com/Towner.mpg Jacket up on Main St. Jacket down on Elm St. Ergo, the jacket dropped in Dealey Plaza, the SBT thus stands debunked. What could be more simple, obvious, un-debatable? Edited February 26, 2007 by Cliff Varnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now