Duane Daman Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 (edited) Craig ... Your hatred of Jack couldn't be jealously could it ? ... I mean after all , he is famous , even among the untruthful game players on the clavius forum , and nobody here or even there for that matter , ever discusses any of your work . Me thinks thou dost protest too much ... again . Sorry, I'm just sick of him stating things as facts when there is absolutely no evidence it ever happened Kevin ... I don't state things as facts when they're not ...That would be your job , as a defender of nasa and their bogus Apollo photography . The video in question and under discussion was PRE-RECORDED FOR PLAYBACK LATER FOR THE TV PROGRAM , where only a few minutes of it was shown to the unsuspecting public ..... Even Armstrong admitted as much in the video .. and if you bothered to watch it , you would know this . It was faked from LEO , the position the Apollo astronot's were in space , on July 16, 17 and 18 of 1969 , the date of this pre-recorded video . Edited February 27, 2007 by Duane Daman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Craig ... Your hatred of Jack couldn't be jealously could it ? ... I mean after all , he is famous , even among the untruthful game players on the clavius forum , and nobody here or even there for that matter , ever discusses any of your work .Me thinks thou dost protest too much ... again . Sorry, I'm just sick of him stating things as facts when there is absolutely no evidence it ever happened Kevin ... I don't state things as facts when they're not ...That would be your job , as a defender of nasa and their bogus Apollo photography . The video in question and under discussion was PRE-RECORDED FOR PLAYBACK LATER FOR THE TV PROGRAM , where only a few minutes of it was shown to the unsuspecting public ..... Even Armstrong admitted as much in the video .. and if you bothered to watch it , you would know this . It was faked from LEO , the position the Apollo astronot's were in space , on July 16, 17 and 18 of 1969 , the date of this pre-recorded video . No Duane I think the proper word for Jack is not famous but rather infamous. And WHO is protesting? Why that would be YOU! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M. West Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Kevin ... I don't state things as facts when they're not ... Then you should have no problem showing some evidence of this: No ... It was taped in advance so the astronots could get their lines right and their facts straight ... Like, some sort of proof that there was a script with lines for them to get right, that there were multiple takes, some kind of editing, etc. You have some evidence right? That would be your job , as a defender of nasa and their bogus Apollo photography . No, my job has nothing to do with NASA or Apollo, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop insinuating that I'm some sort of disinfo agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Greer Posted February 27, 2007 Author Share Posted February 27, 2007 (edited) The video in question and under discussion was PRE-RECORDED FOR PLAYBACK LATER FOR THE TV PROGRAM , where only a few minutes of it was shown to the unsuspecting public ..... Even Armstrong admitted as much in the video .. and if you bothered to watch it , you would know this .It was faked from LEO , the position the Apollo astronot's were in space , on July 16, 17 and 18 of 1969 , the date of this pre-recorded video . You keep on claiming this, yet you keep on forgetting to properly address the TV footage that contradicts both Sibrel's and Percy's claims. Can you explain how the following TV still, taken on board Apollo 11, fits in with either the "porthole" theory, or the "transparency" theory? And I'll ask again, please can you provide an explanation as to why the footage MUST have been filmed in LEO, rather than speculation as to how it MAY have been faked? Cheers Edited February 28, 2007 by Dave Greer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 That would be your job , as a defender of nasa and their bogus Apollo photography . No, my job has nothing to do with NASA or Apollo, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop insinuating that I'm some sort of disinfo agent. Duane - final warning about insinuating people do this as some sort of job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Craig ... Your hatred of Jack couldn't be jealously could it ? ... I mean after all , he is famous , even among the untruthful game players on the clavius forum , and nobody here or even there for that matter , ever discusses any of your work . Actually, Craig's work has been discussed on a couple of pro-Apollo forums. I would agree with Craig's assessment that Jack's Apollo studies are regarded as infamous within the pro-Apollo community. There are also people have great regard for Jack's JFK work who believe his Apollo work is incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now