Jack White Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 This is a test to try to post an image. If this works, I will again be able to post images, but not conveniently...I will have to go to another location and use a different computer than usual. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 22, 2007 Author Share Posted February 22, 2007 Apparently it did not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 22, 2007 Author Share Posted February 22, 2007 Apparently it did not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 22, 2007 Author Share Posted February 22, 2007 Apparently it did not work. I don't know what I did differently, but the third time it worked. I will now occasionally post images if I get the hang of it...but the problem is that all of my images are on the other computer! Jack PS...I am trying to attach a different image to this message as a test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Apparently it did not work. I don't know what I did differently, but the third time it worked. I will now occasionally post images if I get the hang of it...but the problem is that all of my images are on the other computer! Jack PS...I am trying to attach a different image to this message as a test. the images appear, Jack... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Please to see that you have worked this out, though not as convenient, you can now, attach a photo.... B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 (edited) Apparently it did not work. ________________________ Jack, Regarding your test post #3 above, did you ever get a satisfactory answer as to who the short person was who was standing near the Chisums? --Thomas ________________________ Edited February 22, 2007 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Healy Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Jack, thank you for that great example of the strange looking figures in Bronson. What fascinates me is how the corners of the pillars behind them are so sharp by comparison. Jack do you have a similar quality blow-up of Mary Moorman from that same print? Looking at a crop on Richies photo pages which you provided the link for in another thread, (& I realise it's not great but it's the best one I have) it appears to me that anyone wearing dark clothing in that photo may be interpreted differently if one so chooses. For example, was Mary holding a black dog in her arms? Can't you see it's shoulders neck & head infront of her? Anyway if you do have a good blow-up of Mary handy I'd appreciate seeing it(when it is conveinient obviously). Btw Gary sent me an email last time I mentioned the Bronson slide here Jack, he doesn't seem to be too impressed with your Bronson print. He said yours had; ...............Significant color shift and no details in the shadows. The original slide, which is stored at The Sixth Floor Museum, is underexposed by only one stop and is far, far superior to Jack's version. There's a very good copy on the jacket of Trask's POTP. Trask's slide is first generation and he got it from Bronson. gmack What he didn't say though was whether one could distinguish between the two figures on the pedestal in the original slide or whether they were just as tangled looking as they are in your print. If Gary doesn't see this I'll ask him to elaborate. Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted March 3, 2007 Author Share Posted March 3, 2007 Apparently it did not work. ________________________ Jack, Regarding your test post #3 above, did you ever get a satisfactory answer as to who the short person was who was standing near the Chisums? --Thomas ________________________ No. Sorry that I just now encountered replies to this thread. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted March 3, 2007 Author Share Posted March 3, 2007 Jack,thank you for that great example of the strange looking figures in Bronson. What fascinates me is how the corners of the pillars behind them are so sharp by comparison. Jack do you have a similar quality blow-up of Mary Moorman from that same print? Looking at a crop on Richies photo pages which you provided the link for in another thread, (& I realise it's not great but it's the best one I have) it appears to me that anyone wearing dark clothing in that photo may be interpreted differently if one so chooses. For example, was Mary holding a black dog in her arms? Can't you see it's shoulders neck & head infront of her? Anyway if you do have a good blow-up of Mary handy I'd appreciate seeing it(when it is conveinient obviously). Btw Gary sent me an email last time I mentioned the Bronson slide here Jack, he doesn't seem to be too impressed with your Bronson print. He said yours had; ...............Significant color shift and no details in the shadows. The original slide, which is stored at The Sixth Floor Museum, is underexposed by only one stop and is far, far superior to Jack's version. There's a very good copy on the jacket of Trask's POTP. Trask's slide is first generation and he got it from Bronson. gmack What he didn't say though was whether one could distinguish between the two figures on the pedestal in the original slide or whether they were just as tangled looking as they are in your print. If Gary doesn't see this I'll ask him to elaborate. Alan Thanks for your interest, Alan. When the weather gets a little warmer, I will post images from my other computer (which is in my office behind my house, and requires heating up in the winter). I will address the Bronson slide and the apparent tampering and other oddities of it. As for the quality of my Bronson copies, Gary is totally uninformed. My bw copies are superior to anything seen, because they penetrate the density of the color image. I am still intrigued by the two identical ladies in Bronson near Newman who have remained unidentified for 40+ years. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Jack, Perhaps you'll share your takes on Tom Wilson, the technical legitimacy of his work and the processes allegedly empowering it, and his motives as best as you can know them. If there already exists a Wilson thread, please inform this newcomer. As always, warm regards, Charles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now