Jump to content
The Education Forum

Request Moderator Assistance


Recommended Posts

Terry Mauro has recently for some reason chosen to verbally attack me personally in several threads.

Rather than debating any point which I may enter, she chooses to launch "hysterical tirades" toward me.

Please refer to a current thread entitled "Kennedy Family Secrets".

I feel that she is attempting to disallow me freedom of expression of my ideas in regard to both John and Robert Kennedy.

She has attempted to for some unknown reason to publicly belittle me with comments that are even often not related to the subject. Her tirades are so hysterical at times that they do not sound like sane responses.

I request this matter be investigated and that I

am no longer allowed to be "personally attacked" by this person. Debate and disagreement is expected.

Her comments far exceed any interpretatin of debate and disagreement.

Charlie Black

Charlie Black

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry Mauro has recently for some reason chosen to verbally attack me personally in several threads.

You should use the report a post facility at the bottom of individual posts (to the left with an exclamation mark following) to contact the moderators concerning these sorts of issues rather than air your laundry in public. This facility allows you to specifiy when doing so the posts that have caused offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry Mauro has recently for some reason chosen to verbally attack me personally in several threads.

You should use the report a post facility at the bottom of individual posts (to the left with an exclamation mark following) to contact the moderators concerning these sorts of issues rather than air your laundry in public. This facility allows you to specifiy when doing so the posts that have caused offence.

I don't remember who said it ( I believe Bernice??) that this is a research "family" as well as a forum. Because of this, even though we try to be merely stating positions, many posts and responses to posts are largely emotive in nature. (I have seen this over and over again, by viewing older topics, as well as the new ones.)

This is certainly not an excuse to allow this kind of thing to go on, and I certainly don't wish anyone to be offended here.

However, when it seems someone is crossing the line, and a gentle chiding is necessary, it would be better served by PRIVATELY addressing the issue, as Andy said, through the Post Report. That way, no one is publicly viewing an altercation between members which is more personal. Positional sparring is welcome, but it is very difficult to keep those posts free of emotional input.

Ideally, we would like to see this forum rise above personal attacks, and matters discussed in more appropriate ways.

You are certainly welcome to report anything you find offensive, as anyone is welcome. I assure you, we will investigate this. But to do so, we need the posts you have problems with.

Perhaps, next time, this problem will not need to become a thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[However, when it seems someone is crossing the line, and a gentle chiding is necessary, it would be better served by PRIVATELY addressing the issue, as Andy said, through the Post Report. That way, no one is publicly viewing an altercation between members which is more personal. Positional sparring is welcome, but it is very difficult to keep those posts free of emotional input.

Perhaps, next time, this problem will not need to become a thread.

The very existence of this thread is further evidence that Mr. Black's agenda has very little, if anything, to do with identifying the real killers of JFK, who are probably also responsible for the assassinations of MLK and RFK.

Mr. Black shows every sign of being more interested in belittling the victims than in finding the killers, which serves only to distract serious researchers like Bernice Moore. Perhaps distraction is what Mr. Black intends in starting threads like this one, or the recent thread on Marilyn Monroe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[However, when it seems someone is crossing the line, and a gentle chiding is necessary, it would be better served by PRIVATELY addressing the issue, as Andy said, through the Post Report. That way, no one is publicly viewing an altercation between members which is more personal. Positional sparring is welcome, but it is very difficult to keep those posts free of emotional input.

Perhaps, next time, this problem will not need to become a thread.

The very existence of this thread is further evidence that Mr. Black's agenda has very little, if anything, to do with identifying the real killers of JFK, who are probably also responsible for the assassinations of MLK and RFK.

Mr. Black shows every sign of being more interested in belittling the victims than in finding the killers, which serves only to distract serious researchers like Bernice Moore. Perhaps distraction is what Mr. Black intends in starting threads like this one, or the recent thread on Marilyn Monroe.

Mr. Carroll,

I want you to know that I understand the frustration that you feel, and that many feel at the belittling of anyone here. It takes so much away from the matter at hand, and serves no purpose other than to form alliances, which may discount relevant theories presented by some, all because of a side they chose to take.

The last thing we need here is " he said/she said evidence" (between members) portrayed publicly.

Okay, folks.

Again, if you find a post offensive, please report it. We will handle the matter privately.

I am going to lock this thread. I believe it has served its purpose.

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...