Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Seán Lang

Members
  • Content count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Seán Lang

  1. Should history be a compulsory subject to 16? The History Practitioners Advisory Team (HPAT) has produced a report (which you can see on a separate post here) arguing that it should be. Much is expected of school history, especially in the areas of providing a narrative structure and an understanding of the development of the British and their identity and identities; the recent Ofsted report on history underlines these demands. It is not a question of whether or not these demands are reasonable, but whether they are reasonable within the current constraints on the timetable time allocated to history. As things stand, they are not. However, once you have the whole age range of 11-16 to work with, and once you get past the distorting effect of the Options round, then you can begin to address the sort of issues that politicians and the public want us to include. For that reason, I have started a Downing Street petition calling on the government to make history compulsory to 16. You can access it at the following link: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/historyto16/ If you agree with the proposition, then please sign it and circulate it to others, It is open until the end of December, so we have until then to gauge popular support for the position. The more signatures, the more seriously government has to take it. If you're not sure, have a look at the HPAT report and see what you think of the arguments we put forward there. Just to anticipate a couple of questions you might have: Yes, we are arguing from history's point of view, but we are not seeking to privilege history over subjects. We argue, along with Chris Culpin, that the whole idea of Core and Foundation subjects is damaging and should be scrapped. Where does the timetable time come from? From abolishing Citizenship as a subject. It would mean that history, along with other Humanities subjects, would need to take on aspects of Citizenship, but that seems a price worth paying, and entirely appropriate too. No, it wouldn't mean History GCSE for all: it would be perfectly possible to have a non-GCSE course going as well. Yes, it would mean CPD and a certain amount of rethinking. But it will also mean a much better experience of history (oh, and PROPER sources to work with - no more gobbets from textbooks in the exam papers) for our pupils, our students - and for us! Have a look at the HPAT report, see what you think, and sign the petition!
  2. In case you didn't see this post under 'History Debates': Should history be a compulsory subject to 16? The History Practitioners Advisory Team (HPAT) has produced a report (which you can see on a separate post here) arguing that it should be. Much is expected of school history, especially in the areas of providing a narrative structure and an understanding of the development of the British and their identity and identities; the recent Ofsted report on history underlines these demands. It is not a question of whether or not these demands are reasonable, but whether they are reasonable within the current constraints on the timetable time allocated to history. As things stand, they are not. However, once you have the whole age range of 11-16 to work with, and once you get past the distorting effect of the Options round, then you can begin to address the sort of issues that politicians and the public want us to include. For that reason, I have started a Downing Street petition calling on the government to make history compulsory to 16. You can access it at the following link: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/historyto16/ If you agree with the proposition, then please sign it and circulate it to others, It is open until the end of December, so we have until then to gauge popular support for the position. The more signatures, the more seriously government has to take it. If you're not sure, have a look at the HPAT report and see what you think of the arguments we put forward there. Just to anticipate a couple of questions you might have: Yes, we are arguing from history's point of view, but we are not seeking to privilege history over subjects. We argue, along with Chris Culpin, that the whole idea of Core and Foundation subjects is damaging and should be scrapped. Where does the timetable time come from? From abolishing Citizenship as a subject. It would mean that history, along with other Humanities subjects, would need to take on aspects of Citizenship, but that seems a price worth paying, and entirely appropriate too. No, it wouldn't mean History GCSE for all: it would be perfectly possible to have a non-GCSE course going as well. Yes, it would mean CPD and a certain amount of rethinking. But it will also mean a much better experience of history (oh, and PROPER sources to work with - no more gobbets from textbooks in the exam papers) for our pupils, our students - and for us! Have a look at the HPAT report, see what you think, and sign the petition!
  3. Last year I was asked by the Conservatives to put together a team to advise them on history in schools. I did, and the team is called the History Practitioners Advisory Team (HPAT). Although we were commissioned by the Conservatives, we remain an independent group. Report for the Opposition Front Bench on a possible future shape for the school history curriculum Executive Summary 1. History should be made compulsory in every year of secondary schooling to the age of 16. The great majority of pupils drop history altogether at the end of Key Stage 3. Since many schools are trying to cover Key Stage 3 in two years instead of three, increasing numbers of secondary school pupils only study this vital subject for two years before giving it up at the age of 13. Previous attempts to grant pupils an ‘entitlement’ to history have self-evidently failed. The only way to safeguard pupils’ right to learn about their history is to make the subject compulsory. 2. The artificial division of subjects into “Core” and “Foundation” has had the effect of devaluing essential subjects like humanities and languages and should be abolished. The proven educational value of subject disciplines should be reasserted and their position strengthened within the school curriculum. 3. Citizenship as a separate school subject should be abolished. Its different components should be shared out between history, geography and PSE, with history taking over those elements of citizenship education which are designed to develop pupils’ understanding of the different identities that go towards a collective sense of “Britishness”. 4. There should be a single course of study in history from 11 to 16, with a strong core of narrative British history. British history and the history of the British Empire should constitute an important element within GCSE. 5. British history should integrate elements of English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish and Empire and Commonwealth history. This should be done in such a way as to enable pupils to have a better understanding of the various historical experiences which, over a long period of time, have contributed to the creation and development of the modern United Kingdom. 6. Pupils should gain an overall picture of the narrative shape of British history and should not spend time repeating or ‘revisiting’ topics. The current arrangements whereby some topics are repeated in different school years, of which the best known example is the study of Nazi Germany, limit pupils’ opportunity to discover the full richness of the past and should be ended. 7. History GCSE should draw mainly, but not exclusively, on the history studied in Years 10 and 11. Credit should also be given to candidates who draw on the history they have studied in Years 7-9. This should be a condition for the award of an A* grade. 8. The current examination and assessment requirements of history GCSE are in need of major revision. Four changes in particular are needed: i) The development of an assessment objective testing pupils’ ability to construct an historical narrative from historical material. ii) The current highly formulaic and unhistorical source questions in examinations should be replaced by historical inquiry based on real historical sources. Many of these sources could be made available online by museums, archives, libraries and heritage agencies. It is time to end the practice of setting short extracts from sources on examination papers. iii) Mark schemes should reward highly (rather than penalising, as at present) those candidates who show initiative, imagination and wide historical knowledge. The award of an A* grade should be made conditional on wide historical knowledge and evidence of initiative beyond the strict requirements of the examination course. iv) Candidates should be introduced to genuine differences in interpretations of major historical events. Precisely because history is a controversial subject which thrives on debate and argument, it is an essential component in education within a functioning democracy. Pupils should learn that history is open to many different, and often conflicting, interpretations. 9. Resources for the history curriculum should be planned from the start, in conjunction with publishers, online providers, archives, libraries, museums, galleries and heritage agencies. The current arrangements, which allow examiners to profit from their own examinations by writing “badged” textbooks encourages narrow “teaching to the test”, impoverishes the pupils’ experience of history and raises serious questions of probity. It should be ended. 10. There should be genuine incentives to encourage teachers to extend their historical knowledge. Funding should be made available to support the providers of subject-based CPD and the extension of subject knowledge should be a criterion in inspection and for the award of Advanced Skills and Chartered Teacher status. http://www.historypractitioners.org/reports.htm
×