Steven Gaal Posted February 16, 2015 Author Share Posted February 16, 2015 (edited) Steve, Judging by all he has posted, Stephen is a dyed-in-the-wool anti-vaxxer. Okay, we know he seems to take the "tin foil hat" stance on most things but the anti-vax sentiments are worrying when you consider him being in home care for invalids. Taking on such a role in the community is very commendable but Stephen is therefore in the group that needs to keep up to date with vaccines lest he inadvertently pass on a vaccine-preventable disease to a patient with a compromised immune system. He should be promoting vaccinations, not the opposite. // Burton +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++FACTS ON MY SIDE >>> LIES ON THE VAXXER SIDE . Mr. Burton please refuse to force vaccinate people against their will if so ordered to do so. Its OK disobey. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ZERO U.S. Measles Deaths in 10 Years, but Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths Reported http://network.sophiamedia.com/vaccineimpact/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2015/01/deaths_in_the_us_during_the_past_10_years_due_to_measles.jpghttp://network.sophiamedia.com/vaccineimpact/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2015/01/deaths_in_the_us_during_the_past_10_years_due_to_measles.jpg Brian ShilhavyHealth Impact News Editor =============================================== Merck MMR Vaccine Failed to Protect Thousands from Mumps (LINK) Pharmaceutical giant Merck is being accused falsifying data so it could sell a vaccine that wasn’t as effective as advertised and didn’t work for thousands of individuals. Merck has a monopoly on vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella, or MMR and MMR II vaccines. These vaccines have been given to millions of Americans. Thousands of those inoculated still contracted the mumps during outbreaks in 2006, 2010 and 2014. =================== Recent Italian Court Decisions on Vaccines and Autism (LINK) On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan award compensation to a boy for vaccine-induced autism. A childhood vaccine against six childhood diseases caused the boy’s permanent autism and brain damage. While the Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, the U.S. press has been silent. ############################################Patient Given A Chicken Pox Vaccine That Left Him Blind In One Eye UCSF Slapped With $100K Penalty (LINK) ========== People receiving CDC recommended doses of vaccine are still catching and passing on measles. (LINK) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fake Disney measles outbreak: send in the clowns (LINK) "Lacking any real science proving we have a serious 2015 measles outbreak, and lacking any science supporting the idea that the measles vaccine is safe and effective, we’re looking at a psyop called The Disney Story. A fake horror movie happening at ‘the happiest place on Earth,’ Disneyland. It’s a perfect way to scare the moms into vaccinating their kiddies. If the happiest place on Earth isn’t safe, then where is safety? ‘Mickey Mouse infects children.’ Cue the ominous music. ‘Cotton candy dream turns into nightmare.’ ‘Send in the clowns, carriers of the virus.’" (The Underground, Jon Rappoport) 150 measles cases. No deaths. Dangerous outbreak? Are you kidding?... ########################################################################### As Vaccine Uptake Reaches All-Time Lows, Public Health Policy Now Shifts To Mandatory Enforcement and Criminalization To Those Refusing Vaccines (LINK) ########################################################################### Further Evidence of the Ineffectiveness of Flu Vaccine Health Officials in the UK have admitted that flu strain that is sweeping the planet this year, H3N2, is barely affected by the vaccination that is meant to prevent it.Only 3 out of every 100 vaccinated people are prevented from getting full-blown influenza, a situation that has led to a large rise in the elderly winter death rate in the UK. This shows the uselessness of the World Health Organization system of deciding year ahead which flu strains will be circulating the following winter. One of those strains, the one that happens to be causing most illness this year, has mutated so significantly that the vaccine is ineffective against it. The strain, H3N2 causes major respiratory issues in the elderly and those with medical problems, it also happens to be the strain that is dominant in Canada and the USA this year. The CDC is recommending prompt treatment with anti-viral drugs for anyone at risk of complications from the flu…regardless of if they have been vaccinated or not. Their website states that the virus has mutated and that the vaccine is therefore far less effective than it should be. This means the vaccine’s ability to protect against those viruses may be reduced, although vaccinated people may have a milder illness if they do become infected. (source) While on the subject of vaccinations, California is attempting to make opting out of having children vaccinated for personal or religious reasons illegal. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Edited February 16, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted February 16, 2015 Author Share Posted February 16, 2015 (edited) ????????? ............ the real tin-hat crowd ...IF A GOVERNMENT AGENCY SAYS IT ......IT MUST BE TRUE !! ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Monday, February 16, 2015 = Are Your Medications Safe? -- The FDA buries evidence of fraud in medical trials. \ Agents of the Food and Drug Administration know better than anyone else just how bad scientific misbehavior can get. Reading the FDA’s inspection files feels almost like watching a highlights reel from a Scientists Gone Wildvideo. It’s a seemingly endless stream of lurid vignettes—each of which catches a medical researcher in an unguarded moment, succumbing to the temptation to do things he knows he really shouldn’t be doing. Faked X-ray reports. Forged retinal scans. Phony lab tests. Secretly amputated limbs. All done in the name of science when researchers thought that nobody was watching. That misconduct happens isn’t shocking. What is: When the FDA finds scientific fraud or misconduct, the agency doesn’t notify the public, the medical establishment, or even the scientific community that the results of a medical experiment are not to be trusted. On the contrary. For more than a decade, the FDA has shown a pattern of burying the details of misconduct. As a result, nobody ever finds out which data is bogus, which experiments are tainted, and which drugs might be on the market under false pretenses. The FDA has repeatedly hidden evidence of scientific fraud not just from the public, but also from its most trusted scientific advisers, even as they were deciding whether or not a new drug should be allowed on the market. Even a congressional panel investigating a case of fraud regarding a dangerous drug couldn't get forthright answers. For an agency devoted to protecting the public from bogus medical science, the FDA seems to be spending an awful lot of effort protecting the perpetrators of bogus science from the public. Much of my research has to do with follies, foibles, and fraud in science, and I knew that the FDA wasn’t exactly bending over backward to correct the scientific record when its inspectors found problems during clinical trials. So as part of my investigative reporting class at New York University, my students and I set out to find out just how bad the problem was—and how much important information the FDA was keeping under wraps. We didn’t have to search very hard to find FDA burying evidence of research misconduct. Just look at any documentrelated to an FDA inspection. As part of the new drug application process, or, more rarely, when the agency gets a tipoff of wrongdoing, the FDA sends a bunch of inspectors out to clinical sites to make sure that everything is done by the book. When there are problems, the FDA generates a lot of paperwork—what are called form 483s, Establishment Inspection Reports, and in the worst cases, what are known as Warning Letters. If you manage to get your hands on these documents, you’ll see that, most of the time, key portions are redacted: information that describes what drug the researcher was studying, the name of the study, and precisely how the misconduct affected the quality of the data are all blacked out. These redactions make it all but impossible to figure out which study is tainted. My students and I looked at FDA documents relating to roughly 600 clinical trials in which one of the researchers running the trial failed an FDA inspection. In only roughly 100 cases were we able to figure out which study, which drug, and which pharmaceutical company were involved. (We cracked a bunch of the redactions by cross-referencing the documents with clinical trials data, checking various other databases, and using carefully crafted Google searches.) For the other 500, the FDA was successfully able to shield the drugmaker (and the study sponsor) from public exposure. It’s not just the public that’s in the dark. It’s researchers, too. And your doctor. As I describe in the current issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, my students and I were able to track down some 78 scientific publications resulting from a tainted study—a clinical trial in which FDA inspectors found significant problems with the conduct of the trial, up to and including fraud. In only three cases did we find any hint in the peer-reviewed literature of problems found by the FDA inspection. The other publications were not retracted, corrected, or highlighted in any way. In other words, the FDA knows about dozens of scientific papers floating about whose data are questionable—and has said nothing, leaving physicians and medical researchers completely unaware. The silence is unbroken even when the FDA itself seems shocked at the degree of fraud and misconduct in a clinical trial. Source:http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/02/fda_inspections_fraud_fabrication_and_scientific_misconduct_are_hidden_from.html Edited February 16, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Vaccine Ingredients Some parents are concerned about the safety of ingredients found in vaccines, specifically aluminum, mercury, gelatin and antibiotics. However, parents can be reassured that ingredients in vaccines are minuscule and necessary. In this section, we address concerns related to the following vaccine ingredients: Adjuvants Aluminum Antibiotics DNA Egg Allergies Fetal Tissues Formaldehyde Gelatin Human Proteins SV40 Thimerosal Yeast Allergies http://vec.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality (2012) Authors Kathleen Stratton; Andrew Ford; Erin Rusch; Ellen Wright Clayton; Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Institute of Medicine Description In 1900, for every 1,000 babies born in the United States, 100 would die before their first birthday, often due to infectious diseases. Today, vaccines exist for many viral and bacterial diseases. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, passed in 1986, was intended to bolster vaccine research and development through the federal coordination of vaccine initiatives and to provide relief to vaccine manufacturers facing financial burdens. The legislation also intended to address concerns about the safety of vaccines by instituting a compensation program, setting up a passive surveillance system for vaccine adverse events, and by providing information to consumers. A key component of the legislation required the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to collaborate with the Institute of Medicine to assess concerns about the safety of vaccines and potential adverse events, especially in children. Adverse Effects of Vaccines reviews the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence regarding adverse health events associated with specific vaccines covered by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), including the varicella zoster vaccine, influenza vaccines, the hepatitis B vaccine, and the human papillomavirus vaccine, among others. For each possible adverse event, the report reviews peer-reviewed primary studies, summarizes their findings, and evaluates the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence. It finds that while no vaccine is 100 percent safe, very few adverse events are shown to be caused by vaccines. In addition, the evidence shows that vaccines do not cause several conditions. For example, the MMR vaccine is not associated with autism or childhood diabetes. Also, the DTaP vaccine is not associated with diabetes and the influenza vaccine given as a shot does not exacerbate asthma. Adverse Effects of Vaccines will be of special interest to the National Vaccine Program Office, the VICP, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, vaccine safety researchers and manufacturers, parents, caregivers, and health professionals in the private and public sectors. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13164/adverse-effects-of-vaccines-evidence-and-causality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 (continued next post) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Here for sharing far and wide is a collection of the most common myths and misconceptions surrounding flu vaccines, debunked point-by-point with lucid, thoroughly referenced explanations. Remember: if you're going to argue with an anti-vaxxer, it's important to know your stuff. "I could be wrong," writes science journalist Tara Haelle, who compiled the list, "but I'd venture to guess there is more nonsense and misinformation about the flu vaccine than any other vaccine out there." To limit the spread of that misinformation, Haelle decided to write a comprehensive post addressing every flu-vaccine myth she could dig up. The result was an exhaustive, point-by-point rebuttal to 25 myths, complete with over 100 citations, more than half of which link to peer-reviewed studies in medical research journals. (The others, she writes, "are to explanations of concepts such as herd immunity and ethylmercury, to other blog posts or news stories or to CDC and FDA webpages.") She then collected all 25 myths into a nice, compact reference list full of links to each myth's debunking explanation. Here, republished by kind permission, is said list in all its glory: http://io9.com/lets-just-debunk-every-flu-vaccine-myth-in-one-fell-sw-1454237689 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Knight Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Dude Ive taken care of patients with mitochondrial disease. Their respiratory muscles are weak and need a ventilator. Dude do you have any comprehension that the thrust of this thread is future trends ?? Dude ever hear the phrase ,"slippery slope" ?? So, you admit you're arguing from a fallacious viewpoint, using fear and unsubstantiated hear-say, and should be ignored. Right, noted for future. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted February 17, 2015 Author Share Posted February 17, 2015 Steven Gaal, on 15 Feb 2015 - 9:03 PM, said: Dude Ive taken care of patients with mitochondrial disease. Their respiratory muscles are weak and need a ventilator. Dude do you have any comprehension that the thrust of this thread is future trends ?? Dude ever hear the phrase ,"slippery slope" ?? So, you admit you're arguing from a fallacious viewpoint, using fear and unsubstantiated hear-say, and should be ignored. Right, noted for future. Thanks! +++++++++++++++++NOBODY CAN PREDICT THE FUTURE, fear monger Churchill // Steve Knight ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ = Churchill’s Earliest Warning About Hitler by Scott Manning on March 8, 2011 Throughout the 1930’s, Winston Churchill spoke out concerning German rearmament, Britain’s lack of comparable military strength, and Adolf Hitler. Churchill spent most of the decade a mere Member of Parliament and not a member of the British Cabinet. By July of 1939, the British newspapers would demand overwhelmingly that Churchill be made a member of the Cabinet.1 One such newspaper declared on July 2, "That one who has so firm a grasp of the realities of European politics should not be included in the Government must be as bewildering to foreigners as it is regrettable to most of his own countrymen."2 Churchill’s firm "grasp of the realities of European politics" come as early as 1930 on the subject of Hitler. 1930: SWEEPING FASCIST SUCCESS In mid-September 1930, the reports of Germany’s elections were pouring in. The big news item was the gains made by the Nazi Party. The group that had received so much press recently had acquired 6.4 million German votes. This allowed the Nazis to increase their number of seats in the German Parliament from 12 to 107 leaving them second only to the Socialists, who had 143 seats. With nearly a 900% increase in parliamentary power, the headlines in Britain were "SWEEPING FASCIST SUCCESS."3 Early in the next month, Hitler gave an interview with The Times in which he explained that the Nazi Party was "not out for a bloody revolution." He went on to proclaim that his party had made itself "the second strongest party, and at the next election we shall become the strongest party in the Reich." Hitler assured the interviewer that, "We will conquer political power by strictly legal means."4 A few days later, Hitler gave a speech to approximately 30,000 party members, celebrating the recent elections. Hitler described the electoral process as the battle for a new German soul and national spirit. He went on to state that the recent election was merely a milestone on the road towards their final goal, which was the radical reformation of Germany by legal means.5 Churchill Not Convinced Churchill was following the news coming from Germany in detail and remained unconvinced. On October 19, 1930, he met with Prince Bismarck at the German Embassy to discuss current events. When the topic of Hitler and the Nazi Party arose, Churchill acknowledged Hitler’s declarations that he had no intention of waging a war of aggression, however, as the Prince noted, Churchill "was convinced that Hitler or his followers would seize the first available opportunity to resort to armed force."6 The Prince documented the conversation and sent it to the Foreign Ministry in Berlin. The Senior Counselor at the German Embassy in London attached a note stating, "Although one should always bear in mind Winston Churchill’s very temperamental personality when considering his remarks, they nevertheless deserve particular attention." 7 The Prince concluded, "as far as can be humanly foreseen he [Churchill] will play an influential role in any Conservative government in years to come."8 Both Churchill and the German Senior Counselor were correct in their predictions. In 1939, Hitler would invade Poland and a year later, Churchill would play an influential role as Prime Minister. Bibliography Gilbert, Martin. Winston S. Churchill: Vol. 5, Prophet of Truth, 1922-1939. London: Minerva, 1990. ——, Winston S. Churchill Volume V Companion Part 2 Documents: The Wilderness Years, 1929-1935. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1981. The Times, "The German Elections: Full Returns," September 16, 1930. ——, "Herr Hitler’s Speech: Alternative to Bolshevism," October 6, 1930. ——, "Nazi Foreign Policy: Herr Hitler’s Statement," October 4, 1930. Footnotes The following British papers all featured editorials calling for Churchill be included in the Cabinet: the Daily Telegraph, Observer, Yorkshire Post, Manchester Guardian, News Chronicle, Daily Mirror, Evening News, Star, and the Daily Worker. Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill: Vol. 5, Prophet of Truth, 1922-1939 (London: Minerva, 1990), 1080-1082. [↩] Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill: Vol. 5, Prophet of Truth, 1922-1939 (London: Minerva, 1990), 1080. [↩] In big, bold CAPS, the the third title of the article read "SWEEPING FASCIST SUCCESS". The Times, "The German Elections: Full Returns," September 16, 1930. [↩] The Times, "Nazi Foreign Policy: Herr Hitler’s Statement," October 4, 1930. [↩] The Times, "Herr Hitler’s Speech: Alternative to Bolshevism," October 6, 1930. [↩] Quoted in Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill Volume V Companion Part 2 Documents: The Wilderness Years, 1929-1935 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1981), 196-197. [↩] Ibid. [↩] Quoted in Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill: Vol. 5, Prophet of Truth, 1922-1939 (London: Minerva, 1990), 407. [↩] =================== Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted February 17, 2015 Author Share Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) admin Posted Today, 06:22 AM Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality (2012) Authors Kathleen Stratton; Andrew Ford; Erin Rusch; Ellen Wright Clayton; Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Institute of Medicine DescriptionIn 1900, for every 1,000 babies born in the United States, 100 would die before their first birthday, often due to infectious diseases. Today, vaccines exist for many viral and bacterial diseases :lol: :lol: :lol: blah blah blah WRONG !! ================================================== https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 When in pharmacy school we had a lecture across the street at Harvard Dental. It wasn't Dental people but the three top Public Health doctors from Harvard. (probably this made them the three top PUBLIC HEALTH people in he USA). The message ??? Fluoridation is good !!! WHAT A LOAD !!!!!!!!! So when I see a Public health doctor ,I know BS can be a coming fast !!! sg Edited February 17, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted February 18, 2015 Author Share Posted February 18, 2015 (edited) EXPOSED: Governments Pay News Networks To FAKE Stories All The Time February 9, 2015 by John Vibes “The news isn't there to tell you what happened. It's there to tell you what it wants you to hear or what it thinks you want to hear.” - Joss Whedon This week, news reporter Brian Williams created global controversy when he admitted to lying about being in a helicopter crash in Iraq. His admission is just the most recent revelation in a long line of situations that have exposed the corruption that exists within the mainstream media. While it is fairly common for reporters like Williams to get caught up in lies, it is equally common for mainstream media whistleblowers to leave their jobs and speak out against what they had seen. Amber Lyon, for example, is an investigative journalist and photographer, who is most well known for her work reporting human rights abuses against pro-democracy protesters in Bahrain. She has also done extensive work on the power of psychedelic drugs as well as the problem of police brutality. Lyon was thrown into the spotlight in 2012, after she conducted a groundbreaking investigation on the violence that the government in Bahrain was carrying out against their own citizens. Unfortunately, before the episode that she recorded was able to air, CNN cancelled the report because the government in Bahrain paid them to cover it up. Instead of remaining silent about this cover-up, Lyon spoke out about the censorship and publicly left her job at CNN. According to Wikipedia, on September 5, 2012 with the help of journalist Glenn Greenwald, Lyon exposed that CNN International never aired her documentary, iRevolution, on the Bahrain uprising. In an article by Greenwald in The Guardian, Lyon accused the network of censoring the documentary because the Bahrain regime was a paying customer at the network. The article also exposes that the government of Bahrain, as well as other governments throughout the world, are paying CNN for special content casting their countries in a positive light. The banned episode can be viewed below:see http://www.trueactivist.com/exposed-governments-pay-news-networks-to-fake-stories-all-the-time/ 777777777777777777777777777777777 NYC Measles Outbreak Sends Media Into Over-hype ... www.blacklistednews.com/NYC_Measles...Sends...hype.../M.htmlCached Apr 1, 2014 - Getting the measles sucks. Measles is not usually fatal, but that hasn't stopped ABC News and other media outlets from over-hyping this recent ... 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo The big measles lie: Eradication of measles happened BEFORE the vaccine, not after The general consensus among pro-vaxxers is that vaccines save lives, and if it weren't for their existence, infectious disease would be running rampant. But a closer look at the data reveals that the death rates from conditions like measles, scarlet fever, typhoid, whooping...========================================================================= February 18 - Jonathan Benson, staff writer Establishment academia's credibility destroyed by hundreds of cases of research fraud, plagiarism What was once considered a rare exception to the norm appears to be evolving into a disturbingly common pattern of abuse. Peer-reviewed science, and the integrity of what makes it into even the most well-respected scientific journals today, may not be all that it seems... Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com#ixzz3S8YhfYW4 Edited February 18, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted February 19, 2015 Author Share Posted February 19, 2015 Flashback: Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists (LINK) company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit #################################################################################################### = Pharma Business Connections to Hysterical Mom’s Hate-Filled Tirade Against "Anti-Vaxers" http://investmentwatchblog.com/pharma-business-connections-to-hysterical-moms-hate-filled-tirade-against-anti-vaxers/ (see VIDEO LINK) ---------------------------------------------------------------- As German TV fakes footage of Russian tanks to push for war and LA passengers panic over a false gunman report, an hysterical mother’s tirade against "anti-vaxers" has stampeded the collectivist herd over the cliff. The Daily Mail reported that her son was fighting for his life, yet he never contracted measles. Some dedicated moms "who are DONE being SHAMED for poisoning our children with vaccines" did their own research and found the mom promoting vaccines has family connections to — you guessed it — pharmaceutical companies that sell vaccines. Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/pharma-business-connections-to-hysterical-moms-hate-filled-tirade-against-anti-vaxers/#0I7B2UYfcAzBFvTs.99 http://investmentwatchblog.com/pharma-business-connections-to-hysterical-moms-hate-filled-tirade-against-anti-vaxers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 *yawn* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts