Len Colby Posted July 29, 2015 Author Share Posted July 29, 2015 3) Once again your post is irrelevant. Still waiting for examples of potential conspirators and/or truthers who've died mysteriously. All the examples I've seen so far were obscure nobodies, didN'T die suspiciously and/or were NOT challenging the accepted narrative of 9/11. ++++++++++++++++++ Mr. Colby I never said people were killed I said >> confess 911 be killed. MR Colby is Straw MAN your middle name. ?? BS, in post #6 you wrote Confess to 911 >> GET DEATH ,gaal Then when I asked for examples you relied (post #8) try this google ,gaal ---- conspiracy people deaths related to 911 Where are KSM's children ?? gaal You've yet to produce evidence they're missing. The BoP is on YOU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 29, 2015 Author Share Posted July 29, 2015 "When people suggest that whistleblowers would have come forward, of course, they usually have in mind people who, without being complicit in the operation, came to know about it afterward, perhaps realizing that some order they had carried out played a part in the overall operation. Many such people could be kept silent merely by the order to do so, along with the knowledge that if they disobeyed the order, they would be sent to prison or at least lose their jobs. (see Kevin Ryan as an example of this) For people for whom that would be insufficient intimidation, there can be threats to their families. How many people who have expressed certainty about whistleblowers would, if they or their families or their jobs would be endangered by coming forward with inside information, do so? RE most of this post TL:DR Or it could be people who were complicit and regret what they had done as well as those "realizing that some order they had carried out played a part in the overall operation" or those who observed what others had done. Nothing has happened to any of the various truthers and their families except for a few very low profile ones. Nor have AFAIK and whistleblowers or their families died mysterious deaths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) For those of you who think there could have been this Byzantine conspiracy & 14 years later none of the hundreds of people involved said anything ========================================== SOME PEOPLE OFFERED REWARD COMPARTMENTALIZED INFO VERY FEW PEOPLE KNEW ,gaal++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=BLEE&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go ==================== February 23, 2004: Nomination of Former CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief to State Department Rank Announced The Congressional Record reports that Richard Blee, the manager in charge of the CIA’s bin Laden unit on 9/11 (see August 22-September 10, 2001), has been nominated to a State Department rank. In a list of State Department nominations, it states that he and several dozen other people are proposed “to be consular officers and/or secretaries of the diplomatic service of the United States of America, as indicated for appointment as foreign service officers of class three, consular officer and secretary in the diplomatic service of the United States of America.” The listing gives his address as the District of Columbia. [US Congress, 2/23/2004, pp. 48 ] ======== August 11, 2011: Former Counterterrorism ‘Tsar’ Says CIA Deliberately Withheld Information from Him before 9/11 In an interview, former counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke says that the CIA purposefully withheld information from him about two future 9/11 hijackers for over a year before September 11. The interview was taped in October 2009, but is released now by documentary makers Ray Nowosielski and John Duffy ahead of a forthcoming podcast entitled “Who Is Rich Blee?” about the intelligence failures before 9/11. Clarke indicates he found out the CIA failed to pass information on to him not long after 9/11, but assumed the information had been honestly missed by a single junior officer. However, when he later learned at at least 50 officers accessed the information, he began to question this theory. (Note: the news that the information was accessed by at least 50 officers broke in August 2007—see Mid-January-March 2000 and August 21, 2007). According to Clarke, information of the sort the CIA had on two of the hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, was automatically forwarded to him, but he never heard their names before 9/11. Clarke, who admits he cannot prove his allegation that the information was withheld deliberately, says the best explanation he can come up with is that the CIA was attempting to turn the two hijackers into double agents, which is why nobody was told outside the agency. Clarke points out that alleged Saudi intelligence operatives working in the US (see January 15-February 2000 and Spring 2000) who knew the hijackers could have helped with this. Clarke mentions four officials who would have been involved in a decision to withhold information: CIA Director George Tenet, who followed information about al-Qaeda in “microscopic detail,” Counterterrorist Center chief Cofer Black, Alec Station chief Richard Blee, and his deputy Tom Wilshire. Clarke also expresses wonder that the information was not mentioned at a key meeting with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice in July 2001 (see July 10, 2001) when Tenet, Black, and Blee were trying to get her to take strong action against al-Qaeda, because what they had on Almihdhar and Alhazmi was the “most persuasive piece of evidence” they had. He also does not understand why the CIA told the FBI in late August 2001 that the two hijackers had entered the country (see August 21-22, 2001). Clarke adds that the CIA presumably did not mention the fact that the two men were in the US at a meeting of high-level officials on September 4, 2001 (see September 4, 2001) because it would have angered Clarke and this would have led to an investigation in CIA “malfeasance and misfeasance” in concealing the information. However, he thinks the US authorities would have caught the hijackers with a “massive sweep” even if he had been told as late as September 4. Clarke also comments that he never asked Tenet and the other CIA officials about what had happened, as the facts became known to him over time. He also says that Tenet, Black, and Blee have got away with what they did, as they were not held to account by the Joint Congressional Inquiry or the 9/11 Commission. [John Duffy and Ray Nowosielski, 8/11/2011; Truthout (.org), 8/11/2011] Tenet, Black, and Blee received an advance copy of the interview and issued a statement in response (see August 3, 2011). Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Cofer Black, Tom Wilshire, ============ ============ Disconnecting the Dots: How 9/11 Was Allowed to Happen — Chapter 15Published July 22, 2011 by Kevin Fenton Introduction to Chapter 15 of Disconnecting the Dots , for publication at 911Truth.org : In January 2000, several high-ranking al-Qaeda operatives, including alleged Flight 77 hijackers Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, held a summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The meeting was monitored by the CIA and a local Malaysian service, although the agency reportedly failed to exploit this opportunity to learn what bin Laden’s organization was planning. In addition, the CIA deliberately withheld information about the two men, in particular that Almihdhar had a US visa, from the FBI. … Posted in Books, Evidence and Research, Resources and Materials Tagged Alec Station, Alleged Hijackers, CIA, Cofer Black, FBI, Jon Gold, Kevin Fenton, Khalid Al Mihdhar, Nawaf Al Hazmi, Richard Blee Edited July 30, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 31, 2015 Author Share Posted July 31, 2015 Do you intentionally format your posts to make them difficult to read? So of the hundreds of people who would have been involved some supposedly sold their souls to the devil for a few pieces silver ( a promotion) and the others? I like Richard Clarke but accounts of 9/11 related events have been known to have been at variance with those of others. But not even said the CIA held on to the info about the AQ operatives because they wanted 9/11. It seems to have been due to "the wall" between law enforcement and intelligence. You indicated whistle blowers would be killed but people like Cowleen Rowley and Sibrel Edmounds and even ealier whitle blowers such as Agee are still very much alive as are CTs such as Griffin, Jones and Fetzer. http://articles.latimes.com/2004/apr/14/nation/na-wall14_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) Posted Today, 08:41 PM Do you intentionally format your posts to make them difficult to read? So of the hundreds of people who would have been involved some supposedly sold their souls // Colby ============================================================ Sibrel Edmounds and even ealier whitle blowers such as Agee are still very much alive // Colby --------------------------------- January 15-February 2000 and Spring 2000) who knew the hijackers could have helped with this. Clarke mentions four officials who would have been involved in a decision to withhold information: 1. 36 font >> SAYS 4 > and you still say hundreds (NEED BIGGER FONT ?? ) 2. Sibrel Edmounds and Agee they didn't suffer retaliation ?? SIR do you really know no history ??? gaal ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ FAQ #12: Where are the 9/11 Whistleblowers? SEE http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/758-faq-12-where-are-the-911-whistleblowers.html (a good read) the FBI? Hardly. Consider the case of whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. the CIA? No. Consider the case of whistleblower Susan Lindauer. Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds is one of several government employees who was severely persecuted after blowing the whistle on 9/11 Former UL chemistry lab manager Kevin Ryan was fired after challenging his employer's role in NIST's WTC investigation }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} Daily News @ http://RevolutionNews.US~ FOX EXCLUSIVE: Witnesses in Defense Dept. Report Suggest Cover-Up of 9/11 Findings By Catherine Herridge A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as "Able Danger." At least five witnesses questioned by the Defense Department's Inspector General told Fox News that their statements were distorted by investigators in the final IG's report -- or it left out key information, backing up assertions that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was identified a year before 9/11....The IG report didn't accurately reflect her statements to investigators, she said, adding that she doesn't think the investigator simply misunderstood her. Lt. Col Tony Shaffer, an operative involved with Able Danger, said he was interviewed three times by Defense investigators . He claims it was an effort to wear down the witnesses and intimidate them. Two other witnesses, one a military contractor and the other a retired military officer, said they had the same experience. The two witnesses spoke to Fox News on the condition of anonymity because they said they feared retaliation. A fifth witness told Fox that statements to investigators were ignored. -- Edited August 1, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 (edited) Posted Today, 08:41 PM Do you intentionally format your posts to make them difficult to read? So of the hundreds of people who would have been involved some supposedly sold their souls // Colby ============================================================ Sibrel Edmounds and even ealier whitle blowers such as Agee are still very much alive // Colby --------------------------------- January 15-February 2000 and Spring 2000) who knew the hijackers could have helped with this. Clarke mentions four officials who would have been involved in a decision to withhold information: 1. 36 font >> SAYS 4 > and you still say hundreds (NEED BIGGER FONT ?? ) 2. Sibrel Edmounds and Agee they didn't suffer retaliation ?? SIR do you really know no history ??? gaal ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ FAQ #12: Where are the 9/11 Whistleblowers? SEE http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/758-faq-12-where-are-the-911-whistleblowers.html (a good read) the FBI? Hardly. Consider the case of whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. the CIA? No. Consider the case of whistleblower Susan Lindauer. Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds is one of several government employees who was severely persecuted after blowing the whistle on 9/11 Former UL chemistry lab manager Kevin Ryan was fired after challenging his employer's role in NIST's WTC investigation }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} Daily News @ http://RevolutionNews.US~ FOX EXCLUSIVE: Witnesses in Defense Dept. Report Suggest Cover-Up of 9/11 Findings By Catherine Herridge A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as "Able Danger." At least five witnesses questioned by the Defense Department's Inspector General told Fox News that their statements were distorted by investigators in the final IG's report -- or it left out key information, backing up assertions that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was identified a year before 9/11....The IG report didn't accurately reflect her statements to investigators, she said, adding that she doesn't think the investigator simply misunderstood her. Lt. Col Tony Shaffer, an operative involved with Able Danger, said he was interviewed three times by Defense investigators . He claims it was an effort to wear down the witnesses and intimidate them. Two other witnesses, one a military contractor and the other a retired military officer, said they had the same experience. The two witnesses spoke to Fox News on the condition of anonymity because they said they feared retaliation. A fifth witness told Fox that statements to investigators were ignored. -- ############################################ ############################################ Newly Released Memo: Government ‘Minders’ at 9/11 Commission Interviews ‘Intimidated’ Witnesses Published April 27, 2009 April 27, 2009 History Commons Groups A recently released 9/11 Commission memo highlights the role of government “minders” who accompanied witnesses interviewed by the commission. It was added to the National Archives’ files at the start of the year and discovered there by History Commons contributor paxvector. The memo, entitled “Executive Branch Minders’ Intimidation of Witnesses,” complains that: Minders “answer[ed] questions directed at witnesses;” Minders acted as “monitors, reporting to their respective agencies onCommission staffs lines of inquiry and witnesses’ verbatim responses.” The staff thought this “conveys to witnesses that their superiors will review their statements and may engage in retribution;” and Minders “positioned themselves physically and have conducted themselvesin a manner that we believe intimidates witnesses from giving full and candid responses to our questions.” The memo was drafted by three staffers on the commission’s Team 2, which reviewed the overall structure of the US intelligence community.… Edited August 1, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted August 1, 2015 Author Share Posted August 1, 2015 Edmounds worked briefly for the FBI after 9/11 translating Turkish not Arabic or Phashto which she didn't speak (though she speaks Farsi which is related to the latter) and firing had nothing to do with 9/1!. She latter started making far fetched claims about things that would not have come into her purview. Ryan was not an "insider" he worked for a water testing lab in Indiana purchased by UL shortly before 9/11. There was no substantiation for his claims and he was fired for using company letterhead to push them giving the impression his employer backed them. Lindauer was according to several mental health professionals delusional. Only one person supports her claim she gave a vague pre-9/11 warning of a bombing in southern Manhattan. But if we are to believe her the Iraqi gov't was involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 (edited) Edmounds worked briefly for the FBI after 9/11 translating Turkish not Arabic or Phashto which she didn't speak (though she speaks Farsi which is related to the latter) and firing had nothing to do with 9/1!. She latter started making far fetched claims about things that would not have come into her purview. Ryan was not an "insider" he worked for a water testing lab in Indiana purchased by UL shortly before 9/11. There was no substantiation for his claims and he was fired for using company letterhead to push them giving the impression his employer backed them. Lindauer was according to several mental health professionals delusional. Only one person supports her claim she gave a vague pre-9/11 warning of a bombing in southern Manhattan. But if we are to believe her the Iraqi gov't was involved. Articles by Kevin Ryan Text of E-mail Letter from Kevin Ryan to Frank Gayle A Personal Decision, by 9/11 Whistleblower Kevin Ryan Propping Up the War on Terror: Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories Comments on Manuel Garcia's The Physics of 9/11 Manuel Garcia Sees Physics That Don't Exist Looking for Truth in Credentials: The WTC "Experts" Letter to Purdue President Cordova The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites The NIST WTC 7 Report: Bush Science reaches its peak Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Two - Security Finally, an apology from the National Geographic Channel Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence (Part Three of Series: Demolition Access To The WTC Towers) Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Four - Security Ryan is also the creator of the one-hour talk on the NIST Report 'A New Standard For Deception', which is the subject of this review. Ryan was fired from Underwriters Laboratories immediately after the e-mail listed above became public. Ryan has filed a lawsuit against Underwriters Laboratories for wrongful termination, in order to ensure accountability of the taxpayer-supported agency. To support Ryan's effort, you can contribute to the Legal Defense Fund for Kevin Ryan. For more articles by Kevin Ryan, see his blog: Dig Within, which has regularly updated content. back to Articles ============================== ============================== Susan Lindauer Talks to WeAreChange Connecticut ... ▶ 15:48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDNqy6BGLZE www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDNqy6BGLZE Similar Oct 5, 2012 - Uploaded by wearechangect 10/4/12 Whistleblower & activist Susan Lindauer talks to ... because she was NOT "crazy" and that ... ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/01/18/685452/-Breaking-DOJ-suddenly-drops-case-against-Andy-Card-s-cousin# Lindauer's life up until the arrest certainly doesn't give the impression of a person operating in psychoses. She is the daughter of John Lindauer, a former Republican candidate for governor of Alaska. She majored in economics in college and worked for the United States Congress as well as several media outlets as follows ...... ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] As a U.S. Intelligence Asset, Susan Lindauer covered anti-terrorism at the Iraqi Embassy in New York from 1996 up to the invasion. Independent sources have confirmed that she gave advance warning about the 9/11 attack. She also started talks for the Lockerbie Trial with Libyan diplomats. Shortly after requesting to testify before Congress about successful elements of Pre-War Intelligence, Lindauer became one of the first non-Arab Americans arrested on the Patriot Act as an “Iraqi Agent.” She was accused of warning her second cousin, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and Secretary of State Colin Powell that War with Iraq would have catastrophic consequences. Gratis of the Patriot Act, her indictment was loaded with “secret charges” and “secret evidence.” She was subjected to one year in prison on Carswell Air Force Base in Fort Worth, Texas without a trial or hearing, and threatened with indefinite detention and forcible drugging to shut her up. After five years of indictment without a conviction or guilty plea, the Justice Department dismissed all charges five days before President Obama’s inauguration. Video from Portland, Oregon, August, 2011– on CIA’s advance warnings about 9/11 and cover up on the Patriot Act. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg&feature=player_embedded ============================== ============================== http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&projects_and_programs=sibelEdmonds April 2001: FBI Translators Learn Al-Qaeda Suicide Pilots Plan to Hit Skyscrapers in US and Europe FBI translators Sibel Edmonds and Behrooz Sarshar will later claim to know of an important warning given to the FBI at this time. In their accounts, a reliable informant on the FBI’s payroll for at least ten years tells two FBI agents that sources in Afghanistan have heard of an al-Qaeda plot to attack the US and Europe in a suicide mission involving airplanes. Al-Qaeda agents, already in place inside the US, are being trained as pilots. By some accounts, the names of prominent US cities are mentioned. A report on the matter is filed with squad supervisor Thomas Frields, but it’s unclear if this warning reaches FBI headquarters or beyond. The two translators will later privately testify to the 9/11 Commission. [WorldNetDaily, 3/24/2004; Salon, 3/26/2004; WorldNetDaily, 4/6/2004; Village Voice, 4/14/2004] Sarshar’s notes of the interview indicate that the informant claimed his information came from Iran, Afghanistan, and Hamburg, Germany (the location of the primary 9/11 al-Qaeda cell). However, anonymous FBI officials will claim the warning was very vague and doubtful. [Chicago Tribune, 7/21/2004] In reference to this warning and apparently others, Edmonds will say, “President Bush said they had no specific information about September 11, and that’s accurate. However, there was specific information about use of airplanes, that an attack was on the way two or three months beforehand, and that several people were already in the country by May of 2001. They should’ve alerted the people to the threat we were facing.” [Salon, 3/26/2004] She will add, “There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used but not specifically about how they would be used and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major cities with skyscrapers.” [Independent, 4/2/2004] ======================= July-August 2001: FBI Agent Is Deliberately Deceived regarding Skyscraper Warning According to statements by FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds in 2004 and 2005, in July or August 2001, an unnamed FBI field agent discovers foreign documentation revealing “certain information regarding blueprints, pictures, and building material for skyscrapers being sent overseas. It also reveal certain illegal activities in obtaining visas from certain embassies in the Middle East, through network contacts and bribery.” The document is in a foreign language and apparently the agent isn’t given an adequate translation of it before 9/11. Approximately one month after 9/11, the agent will suspect the original translation is insufficient and will ask the FBI Washington Field Office to retranslate it. The significant information mentioned above will finally be revealed, but FBI translation unit supervisor Mike Feghali will decide not to send this information back to the field agent. Instead, he will send a note stating that the translation was reviewed and the original translation was accurate. The field agent will never receive the accurate translation. This is all according to Edmonds’s letter. Edmonds will claim Feghali “has participated in certain criminal activities and security breaches, and [engaged] in covering up failures and criminal conducts within the department.” While the mainstream media will not report on this incident, in January 2005 an internal government report will determine that most of Edmonds’s allegations have been verified and none of them could be refuted. [Edmonds, 8/1/2004; Anti-War (.com), 8/22/2005] ==================== September 20, 2001 and After: FBI Translator Sees Pattern of Deliberate Failure Immediately after beginning her job as an FBI translator, Sibel Edmonds encounters a pattern of deliberate failure in her department. Her supervisor, Mike Feghali, allegedly says, “Let the documents pile up so we can show it and say that we need more translators and expand the department.” She claims that if she was not slowing down enough, her supervisor would delete her work. Meanwhile, FBI agents working on the 9/11 investigation would call and ask for urgently needed translations. In January 2002, FBI officials will tell government auditors that translator shortages are resulting in “the accumulation of thousands of hours of audio tapes and pages” of material that has not been translated. [Washington Post, 6/19/2002] After she discloses this in an October 2002 interview with CBS’ 60 Minutes, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) says of her charges, “She’s credible and the reason I feel she’s very credible is because people within the FBI have corroborated a lot of her story.” He points out that the speed of such translation might make the difference between an attack succeeding or failing. [CBS News, 10/25/2002; New York Post, 10/26/2002] An investigation by the Justice Department’s Inspector General’s Office (After September 14, 2001-October 2001): FBI Translation Supervisor Blocks Agent’s Request to Have Certain 9/11-Related Material Re-Translated One of Sibel Edmond’s main assignments as a contract FBI translator is to expedite requested translations from field agents. Shortly after she is hired by the FBI, an Arizona field agent requests that certain material be re-translated. He is concerned that the original translation may not have been thorough enough. When she does the re-translation, she discovers that it contains information extremely relevant to the September 11 attacks, including references to “blueprints, pictures, and building material for skyscrapers being sent overseas” It also “reveals certain illegal activities in obtaining visas from certain embassies in the Middle East, through network contacts and bribery” (see July-August 2001). [Edmonds, 8/1/2004] After re-translating the documents, she goes to supervisor Mike Feghali and says, “I need to talk to this agent over a secure line because what we came across in this retranslating is gigantic, it has specific information about certain specific activity related to 9/11.” But Feghali refuses to send the retranslation to the same agent, telling her, “How would you like it if another translator did this same thing to you? The original translator is going to be held responsible.” The agent never receives the re-translation he requested from Edmonds. Instead he is told by the Washington field office that the original translation is fine. [Boston Globe, 7/5/2004; Edmonds, 8/1/2004] Edited August 1, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted December 12, 2015 Author Share Posted December 12, 2015 (edited) Gaal - I asked about people who would've been involved in carrying out the supposed 9/11 inside job. Edmounds only joined the FBI as a civilian contractor AFTER 9/11. Kevin Ryan worked for a water testing company purchased by UL shortly before the attacks. It was NOT part of the standards testing division. He was fired for falsely indicating others at UL shared his views. 14 years after the attacks none of the other thousands of people who worked for the company have corroborated his claim company officials said it had tested steel used to build the WTC. Several psychiatrists and judges concluded Lindaur was crazy. AFAIK she has yet to get a mental health professional to declare otherwise and not even she claimed to have been involved. Edited December 18, 2015 by Len Colby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now