Several US Presidents over the years have promised transparency regarding the JFK records. But once elected, their positions changed. Which begs the question: what changed their position? CIA arguments? Pressure? Threats? If so, where's the guarantee that RFK Jr. wouldn't also succumb to such tactics if elected? I fail to see any such guarantee. After all, "they" [whomever "they" might be] have already killed more than one Kennedy; to "them," what's one more? Until there's a bulle