Sorry to disagree with you John, but the HA is NOT in discussion with QCA over a joint History and Geography GCSE - one of the HA's members is. We do not support the proposal as such. And also there seems to be some confusion over the term 'hybrid'. The 'hybrid' GCSE's we are involved in with QCA are one-subject - history OR geography - which combine 'academic' GCSE history and 'vocational' history. The exciting thing about this is that at last QCA are proposing a much more relaxed approach to assessing - trusting teachers more. A much more flexible approach to assessment is a real sea-change in my opinion. It also allows you to study 'old' history at GCSE too!
As I understand it, the proposed joint History and Geography GCSE is an attempt to widen subject exposure. After all, from Sept 2004 every student has to take Humanities at 14. It is as I understand it an attempt to fill a gap for those who want neither to take History at GCSE or Geography. How successful it will be at that is open to question, and the proposals seem to me to promote the worst of both subjects, not the best. Having taught integrated humanities to GCSE in the past, I think it rarely works - unless you have really keen teachers you get geographers teaching poor history, and vice versa.
I don't think good history teachers have much to worry about from this proposal - it is a long way from reality yet!