Jump to content
The Education Forum

Doug Weldon

Members
  • Content Count

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Doug Weldon

  1. I've been sitting on the sidelines and listening intently. You should know, Doug, that when I said I wanted to "investigate" Glanges I meant nothing serious or sinister. I had not a clue who she was. I think Pamela said she was a nursing student. Probably, I should have said "I want to find out who Glanges is. I've never heard of her before." That would have expressed my meaning more accurately. Here's a really simple view of how I see it: Altgens 5 shows an undamaged windshield at Z 255. Altgens 6 shows the windshield damaged subsequent to the head shot. The placement and form of t
  2. Thank you for the correction, that is completely my bad. I went with the spelling used on the yahoo group discussions and in some email I received from someone who knew him. His "PRINCE9" e address seemed in keeping with that. Robert Livingston, by the way has no e on the end of it. People often confuse his name with the spelling of JFK author Harry Livingstone. By the way, I have done some serious deletion of old exchanges here ... partly for the sake of brevity, partly because I was getting error messages saying there were too many quoted blocks of text. Everything that we have posted is av
  3. Doug, did you tape this discussion? Do you have notes? I'm interested in anything Day had to say. If you have anything which would be of help, it would be greatly appreciated. Pat Pat, Yes, I did do some recording. I talked with him in 1996 or 1998. I believe it was more likely 1996. I did so on microcassette and also did some videotaping on 8mm. Fortunately I still have a microcassette recorder and until two days ago I thought I no longer had an 8mm video camera but discovered I do. Hopefully. it stills work. I would be happy to assist you once I complete some of my current projects
  4. Thank you for the correction, that is completely my bad. I went with the spelling used on the yahoo group discussions and in some email I received from someone who knew him. His "PRINCE9" e address seemed in keeping with that. Robert Livingston, by the way has no e on the end of it. People often confuse his name with the spelling of JFK author Harry Livingstone. By the way, I have done some serious deletion of old exchanges here ... partly for the sake of brevity, partly because I was getting error messages saying there were too many quoted blocks of text. Everything that we have posted is av
  5. Jerry: I sincerely thank you for your reasonable replies. I want to clear up one misconception. I did not interview Glanges in person but did so over the phone. From what I have been able to determine the other witness with Glanges was a man and I believe I know who it was. Even though people may have told their story before it was clear to me that people like Ellis, Dudman, and Whitaker were genuinely worried about their welfare. I don't know what your experience is but I have been to many murder scenes and have prosecuted and defended a murder case.I don't accept all evidence and was ver
  6. It was Bernice Moore who kindly posted the link over here, Doug. At that time i wasn't a member of this forum here. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...14532&st=75 Posting#77 I will state something about my study soon but i wait for something which will have to be arrived here at my home the next days. Meanwhile i thank you both Doug and Jerry for your very kind words. Take care Sincerely Martin Martin: I know that Bernice posted your analysis here. I believe Jerry should have posted your analysis here and on Lancer. There is no question that a shell game was bei
  7. Jerry: I sincerely thank you for your reasonable replies. I want to clear up one misconception. I did not interview Glanges in person but did so over the phone. From what I have been able to determine the other witness with Glanges was a man and I believe I know who it was. Even though people may have told their story before it was clear to me that people like Ellis, Dudman, and Whitaker were genuinely worried about their welfare. I don't know what your experience is but I have been to many murder scenes and have prosecuted and defended a murder case.I don't accept all evidence and was ver
  8. Jerry: I sincerely thank you for your reasonable replies. I want to clear up one misconception. I did not interview Glanges in person but did so over the phone. From what I have been able to determine the other witness with Glanges was a man and I believe I know who it was. Even though people may have told their story before it was clear to me that people like Ellis, Dudman, and Whitaker were genuinely worried about their welfare. I don't know what your experience is but I have been to many murder scenes and have prosecuted and defended a murder case.I don't accept all evidence and was ver
  9. Dean...please make some comments about important things you learned by watching Doug's presentation. I want to keep bumping it to page one until I can get Bernice or someone to post some images for me. Others should watch also, and comment...especially Pamela, who is very critical of Doug. Jack No problem Jack Most of Dougs presentation matched his chapter in MIDP, however I did gather more insight on Vaughn Ferguson and his strange actions, I consider ferguson to be a part of the conspiracy for sure Dougs presentation nailed that home, the conflicting dates on the re-upolstry and c
  10. Jerry: I sincerely thank you for your reasonable replies. I want to clear up one misconception. I did not interview Glanges in person but did so over the phone. From what I have been able to determine the other witness with Glanges was a man and I believe I know who it was. Even though people may have told their story before it was clear to me that people like Ellis, Dudman, and Whitaker were genuinely worried about their welfare. I don't know what your experience is but I have been to many murder scenes and have prosecuted and defended a murder case.I don't accept all evidence and was ver
  11. I just finished watching all of Doug's Minneapolis presentation, and I urge everyone to do so, especially Pamela. It will answer many questions. I shot a few screen shots of some of his presentation. I will try to post them, but have been told that my available attachment space has been used up. I may get Bernice to post them for me. Some of the things I shot.... ...a large crowd at Parkland standing in front of the limo, about six feet from the windshield. ...several cars coming west on Elm showing the view from the south knoll location. If you are interested in the windshield hole, pl
  12. I just finished watching all of Doug's Minneapolis presentation, and I urge everyone to do so, especially Pamela. It will answer many questions. I shot a few screen shots of some of his presentation. I will try to post them, but have been told that my available attachment space has been used up. I may get Bernice to post them for me. Some of the things I shot.... ...a large crowd at Parkland standing in front of the limo, about six feet from the windshield. ...several cars coming west on Elm showing the view from the south knoll location. If you are interested in the windshield hole, pl
  13. Jerry: Dishonest was perhaps too strong of a word and for that I apologize and I appeciate your humility that you may have been confused, mistaken or wrong. I do think that Martin's analysis should have been placed on the sites where the article posted. I do not know you or Barb and the one time I met Josiah I made the mistake of mentioning Jim's name and I incurred his wrath for several minutes. I outlined my concerns in my prior post and I continue to have them. I am not aware of any witnesses viewing the hole from the rear of the limo. I am curious who the odd woman shown in your picture i
  14. An exchange here between Mr. Fetzer and myself, unrelated to the discussion with Doug Weldon below, deleted for the sake of length/space.-BJ My heavens, Doug, neither I nor anyone else ever expected you to transcribe and post your complete Black Op interview. Since you expressed taking issue with our article, we were just expecting some specific examples we could address rather than vague generalities about sloppy research, fabrication, use of unchecked information from other sites and principled witnesses. etc. Like Jerry, I am glad you meant no personal attack nor offense; also like J
  15. Jerry: Dishonest was perhaps too strong of a word and for that I apologize and I appeciate your humility that you may have been confused, mistaken or wrong. I do think that Martin's analysis should have been placed on the sites where the article posted. I do not know you or Barb and the one time I met Josiah I made the mistake of mentioning Jim's name and I incurred his wrath for several minutes. I outlined my concerns in my prior post and I continue to have them. I am not aware of any witnesses viewing the hole from the rear of the limo. I am curious who the odd woman shown in your picture i
  16. Jerry: Dishonest was perhaps too strong of a word and for that I apologize and I appeciate your humility that you may have been confused, mistaken or wrong. I do think that Martin's analysis should have been placed on the sites where the article posted. I do not know you or Barb and the one time I met Josiah I made the mistake of mentioning Jim's name and I incurred his wrath for several minutes. I outlined my concerns in my prior post and I continue to have them. I am not aware of any witnesses viewing the hole from the rear of the limo. I am curious who the odd woman shown in your picture i
  17. Jerry: Dishonest was perhaps too strong of a word and for that I apologize and I appeciate your humility that you may have been confused, mistaken or wrong. I do think that Martin's analysis should have been placed on the sites where the article posted. I do not know you or Barb and the one time I met Josiah I made the mistake of mentioning Jim's name and I incurred his wrath for several minutes. I outlined my concerns in my prior post and I continue to have them. I am not aware of any witnesses viewing the hole from the rear of the limo. I am curious who the odd woman shown in your picture i
  18. Jerry: Dishonest was perhaps too strong of a word and for that I apologize and I appeciate your humility that you may have been confused, mistaken or wrong. I do think that Martin's analysis should have been placed on the sites where the article posted. I do not know you or Barb and the one time I met Josiah I made the mistake of mentioning Jim's name and I incurred his wrath for several minutes. I outlined my concerns in my prior post and I continue to have them. I am not aware of any witnesses viewing the hole from the rear of the limo. I am curious who the odd woman shown in your picture i
  19. Hi Jim, I am very curious too. One has to wonder how ... and why ... you are still promoting Dudman, as proof of, and as has having personally seen, a through-and-through hole in the windshield when the other witness you proffer above, Dr. Robert Livingston, said quite the opposite in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE? And Livingston was relating what Dudman personally told him. Livingston, of course, never saw the windshield at all. But, according to what he wrote in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE, he did know Dudman and spoke to him about it. “Our families had a dinner discussion on this subject in Washingto
  20. Hi Jim, I am very curious too. One has to wonder how ... and why ... you are still promoting Dudman, as proof of, and as has having personally seen, a through-and-through hole in the windshield when the other witness you proffer above, Dr. Robert Livingston, said quite the opposite in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE? And Livingston was relating what Dudman personally told him. Livingston, of course, never saw the windshield at all. But, according to what he wrote in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE, he did know Dudman and spoke to him about it. “Our families had a dinner discussion on this subject in Washingto
  21. Hi Jim, I am very curious too. One has to wonder how ... and why ... you are still promoting Dudman, as proof of, and as has having personally seen, a through-and-through hole in the windshield when the other witness you proffer above, Dr. Robert Livingston, said quite the opposite in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE? And Livingston was relating what Dudman personally told him. Livingston, of course, never saw the windshield at all. But, according to what he wrote in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE, he did know Dudman and spoke to him about it. “Our families had a dinner discussion on this subject in Washingto
  22. Hi Jim, I am very curious too. One has to wonder how ... and why ... you are still promoting Dudman, as proof of, and as has having personally seen, a through-and-through hole in the windshield when the other witness you proffer above, Dr. Robert Livingston, said quite the opposite in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE? And Livingston was relating what Dudman personally told him. Livingston, of course, never saw the windshield at all. But, according to what he wrote in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE, he did know Dudman and spoke to him about it. “Our families had a dinner discussion on this subject in Washingto
  23. Hi Jim, I am very curious too. One has to wonder how ... and why ... you are still promoting Dudman, as proof of, and as has having personally seen, a through-and-through hole in the windshield when the other witness you proffer above, Dr. Robert Livingston, said quite the opposite in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE? And Livingston was relating what Dudman personally told him. Livingston, of course, never saw the windshield at all. But, according to what he wrote in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE, he did know Dudman and spoke to him about it. “Our families had a dinner discussion on this subject in Washingto
  24. I have studied the assassination since 1978. Education: B.A. Political Science, Sociology, Education Olivet College 1975. J.D. Thomas M. Cooley Law School 1978, M.A. Educational Leadership Western Michigan University 1984. I have practiced law for 31 years including serving as an assistant prosecuting attorney. I was a high school teacher and coach. For twelve years I was an adjunct professor at Western Michigan University in the undergraduate department of criminal justice and the graduate department of educational leadership teaching school law. I presented at the Lancer Conference in 1998
×
×
  • Create New...