Mark Henceroth

I'm trying to locate the hand drawn map that Jim Braden marked-up during his HSCA testimony , it became an exhibit but I can not find it anywhere, thanks for any help you can give.

David Ferrie Old Roman Catholic Church Connection

newly discovered file

http://www.russianbooks.org/oswald/ferrie.htm

Thanks , do you happen to know whether or not Ferrie was a helicopter pilot ?

I believe that Dale Meyers presents a very representative graphic of the shooting in his 3D animation, the SBT is a fact in my eyes also though I only need to watch the Z film to determine this.

If you need only to "watch the Z-film to determine this" as you claim, then why do you need to cite an animation of the crime by Dale Myers to bolster your assertion?

Your statements are blatantly self-impeaching, contradictory, and borderline psychotic.

Oh well, not here to argue. I was just answering the poll question, only animals kill the way Oswald did that day.

On the SBT I was just saying that Dale Meyers made a nice graphic to illustrate the probability of the SBT, he did a good job on it but its not needed to determine the SBT. As it's pretty obvious in the Z film what happened, how often do you get actual film footage of a crime taking place especially in 1963, yet many people argue against them getting shot when they did, it's pretty funny to me that people deny the SBT when they have a film of it happening.

I feel if you are not able to look at that film and tell that two men are being shot at the same time then you aren't much of a detective and I don't want to spend a lot of time discussing the case with people that can't at least see the obvious when its on film.. It's sort of a litmus test that I use to tell if someone is actually looking for the truth in the case or if they are just a conspiracy nut.

Hey Mark, you ignore my question. What kind of animal was Oswald? If he shot the President with a high powered rifle from the Sixth Floor Sniper's Nest, what kind of animal was he?

If you look at other, similar situations where people were assassinated or attempted to be assassinated by snipers, you have case studies of murders that were well pllanned out in advance and were acomplished by well trained and executed assassins, like Bugsy Siegal and the Jackal's attempt on Charles DeGaulle. If you can give me ONE example of a lone crazy nut case sniping a major politician with a rifle from a distance, I'd like to hear about it.

Even the DC Sniper had an acomplice, and the Texas Tower killer both had military backgrounds, though they were clearly nuts and shot at anybody, not the President.

If Oswald killed the President of the USA as he is alledged to have done, he wasn't a deranged, lone nut case, but a well trained and excellent, succesful assassin.

You're attempt to portray him as a "pure animal with no conscience" misscasts him as the wrong animal. He did have a conscience and was not just acting on pure animal instincts, or when he "snapped," as Gary Mack puts it, he would have killed anyone, not just the president and a cop who got in his way, after the fact.

If he did what you say he did, he was a smooth, successful Cat, and not a disjointed nut case.

Unless you can demonstrate that such nut cases kill presidents as snipers.

Bill Kelly

I refer to his actions as that of an animal, shooting three people and killing two of them and then attempting to shoot more in the theatre I say animal, you say not , thats fine we don't have to agree on that, it doesn't matter what we call him. It has nothing to do with is innocence or guilt in the case.

I believe that Dale Meyers presents a very representative graphic of the shooting in his 3D animation, the SBT is a fact in my eyes also though I only need to watch the Z film to determine this.

If you need only to "watch the Z-film to determine this" as you claim, then why do you need to cite an animation of the crime by Dale Myers to bolster your assertion?

Your statements are blatantly self-impeaching, contradictory, and borderline psychotic.

Oh well, not here to argue. I was just answering the poll question, only animals kill the way Oswald did that day.

On the SBT I was just saying that Dale Meyers made a nice graphic to illustrate the probability of the SBT, he did a good job on it but its not needed to determine the SBT. As it's pretty obvious in the Z film what happened, how often do you get actual film footage of a crime taking place especially in 1963, yet many people argue against them getting shot when they did, it's pretty funny to me that people deny the SBT when they have a film of it happening.

I feel if you are not able to look at that film and tell that two men are being shot at the same time then you aren't much of a detective and I don't want to spend a lot of time discussing the case with people that can't at least see the obvious when its on film.. It's sort of a litmus test that I use to tell if someone is actually looking for the truth in the case or if they are just a conspiracy nut.

After looking at the evidence that matters it's pretty clear to me that Oswald shot Kennedy & Conally from the TSBD 6th floor window and then a little later he shot Officer Tippit in cold blood on a city street , after that he pulled his gun on more cops in the theatre during his arrest. Fortunately the policemen there were able to disarm him before more shots were fired and fortunately Conally lived , the other two were not so lucky. Oswald was a pure animal with no conscience or regard for human life. I believe that Dale Meyers presents a very representative graphic of the shooting in his 3D animation , the SBT is a fact in my eyes also though I only need to watch the Z film to determine this.

I've become an assassination buff within the last year.

www.jfksbt.com