Scott Kaiser

Because Taylor, Rostow, McNamara, Rusk and Bundy wanted to escalate the war Mr. Kennedy and Senator Mansfield are the two that saw things differently. I'm telling you Jim, and I hope that what I'm about to tell you, you'll allow it to sink in, digest it, research it, read about it, swallow it, absorb it, and take it in. Mr. Mansfield is the ONLY person whose report was considered by Kennedy to pull out of Vietnam.

Love it, funny DVP.... SMH... to this thread, lol.... That means laugh out loud!

Jim, what am I suppose to do? Am I suppose to concede because you're Jim? Are you telling me that you don't want me to be honest? Is this how it's suppose to work? I told you that JKG never met with Kennedy regarding his opinion about the Vietnam war, that "opinion" belongs to Kennedy, and Kennedy alone. Who Kennedy elect's to communicate with and send to Vietnam is Kennedy's decision, and Kennedy's decision alone as my second cousin Congressman Donald Irwin would say. Jim, you're a good researcher, and I have nothing against you, I don't know you, but what reason do I have to lie? I've never been in politics as was my father, I never spoke up for Kennedy or spoke badly about him. I'm not a person that chooses sides. I'm not a conspiracy theorist nor do I believe Oswald acted alone. I am probably the single most liberal person when it comes to Kennedy. There things you are very much unaware of. What if I told you that I do know for a fact that Oswald was not involved in Kennedy's assassination would you believe me? You'd want proof, you'd want to know how would a guy, someone like me would know something like this right? You'd want proof that what I'm saying is true right? What if I told you that not only was Oswald not involved, but I plan on exposing within my power to "prove" what I say is true, not some statement about what might be virtually true. I don't care what David Kaiser or the Pope wrote about Kennedy's assassination, can I get through to you on this? Jim, it's a sad day when people start to listen to those who think they are just so much smarter then everyone else that degenerates, untruthful folks like me can't tell you the truth.

From Post #1: "The first three people who were on the scene when the rifle was found, Weitzman, Boone and Craig were all Sheriff's Deputies. In one way or another, they all identified it as a German make." However, this is beside the point. What I am trying to stress is that anyone who claims to have read the calibre stamped on a Mauser rifle is full of beans. How many times does one person have to be wrong before you begin to seriously question his work?

Some folks when building a Kitchen like to throw in the Kitchen sink as well, for some folks, they believe everyone and their mama did it... smh...

The Postal Money Oder, yes! It's a complete and utter forgery!

Although, I'm fairly certain, there are a few buttons here that can be pushed quit easily.

Couldn't get the elevator to work? How hard is it to push a button?

How could this be if in Roy Truly's testimony before getting edited and according to DPD Baker who said he encountered Oswald on the second floor said himself the freight elevator wasn't working? There seems to be a lot of double talk going on.

What are YOU talking about?!? I never said that! Should be called "virtual reality" this never happened! There is NO [may] McNamara wanted to go in with guns a blazing, send the whole damn United States if he could that's why he wanted Congress to over look the aptitude test so we could send in all the stupid people so they could get killed, and Kennedy was willing to aside with Senator Mansfield who I keep referring too who opposed the war, what part of that don't you understand?!?

David, you sometimes make sense, I see you're wearing your flip flops. Oswald had nothing to do with Kennedy's assassination, why is that so hard for you to believe? But, seriously David, when does your opinion, your "honest opinion," theories and hypothesis count? SMH....

Jim, clam down and breathe. I'm not saying Galbraith wasn't part of Kennedy's White House "cabinet." My challenges to you have not been whether or not Galbraith had any communication with Kennedy. (You) said, "But right around this time, within a few weeks, he meaning (Kennedy) sent JKG to Saigon to give him a report and recommendation. I said, Jim, this is partially true, but you didn't want to believe me. I especially told you that Galbraith had not gone to Vietnam, and I will tell you that Galbraith if he meet up with McNamara, it wasn't under the presidents direction. Secondly, Kennedy and McNamara did not see eye to eye about the Vietnam war when McNamara was "committed to more troops, and he wanted to escalate the war by using more military equipment," the very thing Mansfield and Kennedy were apposed to, it was until [after] president LBJ asked McNamara to resign in 1967 that he left office in 1968 only then did he have a change of heart towards the war. Now, with all this said, I can careless about all the memos, letters, and late night phone calls to the president by Galbraith. Mr. Kennedy never, ever asked Galbraith to go to Vietnam and report back, that never happened. The more you try to veer off course, the less chance you will ever admit you're wrong. Listen, I have nothing to prove, I don't want a pat on the back on anything I may find and expose. I ask myself why in the hell did I find this and after 50 plus years that other good researchers did not? I even ask God, why me Lord? I don't care if I don't sell one book, but... If I had sold a billion books it's not because I'm hoping to get rich, it's because I want to tell a story no one has ever heard about, and if someone came to me with a billion dollars and said this is yours, I'd question why? My joy, happiness and excitement comes from getting the word out. I'm not in this for recognition. I can careless who reviews my book or not, it doesn't brother me if your views on the coup differ from mine. The only thing that matters to me is telling the truth, Martin asked for the truth, I simply gave it to him. Whether you want to believe me or not is up to you, but it's you Jim who is not up to speed.

If you want, get my first book. I don't recommend it though only because my first book is 248 pages, my update is 328 pages. A lot of information is in there. I have even given away a few PDFs I'm sure some folks have already taken a sneak peek, what they haven't seen is the pertinent information I purposely left out. Trust me, you're gonna want to review this book. Good luck!

But of course! Slaps my forehead, Kennedy call JKG in India and asked him to hop on an airplane to Vietnam since the distance between Vietnam and India is 3190.14 km= 1982.26 miles. And, of course if you travel by airplane (which has average speed of 560 miles) between Vietnam to India, It takes 3.54 hours to arrive. But I think in those days planes were a little slower, don't quote me on that, as for the coup, you're entitled to your opinion, although, it's not always correct. Scott: Do you know how far it is from Washington to Saigon? Jim, now, I may be wrong, rarely, but may be. What you want me to believe is this, JKG is in India, so, Kennedy wants JKG to go to VN, from VN travel to Washington, report to Kennedy.... THEN! Fly back to India, when Kennedy had already appointed Mansfield to fly from Washington, which he did, return back to Washington, which he did, report to Kennedy, which he did, give Kennedy his recommendation which he did, as Kennedy [knew' both he and Mansfield were opposed against the war, which he did. But, rather than believing me you are still trying to find away out of this versus conceding a losing battle, I think you should reevaluate what I also have to say about the coup.

You see DVP! I don't discriminate, I believe in the equal opportunity to get picked on.

And, of course, like every good Ambassador, they should abandon their position to see what the hell is going on in Vietnam, well, crap! We no longer need Senator Mansfield anymore!

But of course! Slaps my forehead, Kennedy call JKG in India and asked him to hop on an airplane to Vietnam since the distance between Vietnam and India is 3190.14 km= 1982.26 miles. And, of course if you travel by airplane (which has average speed of 560 miles) between Vietnam to India, It takes 3.54 hours to arrive. But I think in those days planes were a little slower, don't quote me on that, as for the coup, you're entitled to your opinion, although, it's not always correct.

I almost forgot to tell you that JKG was in India from 1961-63. Not VN. I'm sure you already knew that.

By the way, if in-case you didn't know who my father was, his name was Edwin Kaiser. The greatest patriot ever for the accomplishments he did to expose THIS countries treasonous acts.

In-fact, in my new update, I dedicate a few chapters to this. I'm still waiting on Stone's forward before I can proceed publishing.

Jim, this is partially true, but it was Senator Mansfield who Kennedy sent to Vietnam and who reported back to Kennedy what the Diem brother's were doing with the money the United States gave them, it was during the few months of culmination that plan plots to exit the Diem brother's out of Vietnam started, however, China didn't want them, after a poorly drafted cable was written up, Kennedy signed it, he believed it to be a coup without an assassination. The CIA interpreted the cable as assassinating the Diem brother's. Kennedy was upset over the fact a round table discussion didn't take place first before the assassination. Martin - You want the truth? That is the truth.

I believe it's no secret what Kennedy's intention was for Vietnam? First I'd like to point out the reason for the transcripts and tapes that [may] have stopped on November 7, 1963, could it be because of the assassination of the Diem brother's on November 2, 1963? This passage quoted above certainly sounds as though the JCS and the Pentagon is who should be responsible for Kennedy's assassination. Aside from all the hoopla, theories and educated language, is there any real proof that's being offered up here? Ouch! my head hurts.

Let me guess, some folks believe Kennedy was assassinated over Vietnam? Was Watergate also over Vietnam? Didn't they plot to assassinate Nixon too? Didn't Nixon end the war in Vietnam? Were the burglars at Watergate apart of wanting to keep the Vietnam war going? Was it really over communism on the other side of the world, or right here in our own backyard, if the company was willing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to assassinate Castro who was very hard to get too, how much do you think they were paid to get to Kennedy in an open limo just waiting for the right time. I could write a book on this, oh wait, I did, my update.

Campaign manger, head political adviser, what's the difference? Perhaps. I shouldn't have asked, I may end up getting a 50 page SA, to me. it's all the same. Trump is running for president, and Stone is advising/managing as his political strategist. Here is the only video I could find that Stone says he fired Trump, Trump, an hour later said to a CNN reporter that he fired Stone. However, I can't seem to find any record of Trump saying this in his own words CNN has never released any interview by Trump saying he fried Stone: CNN has also banned Stone from appearing on behalf of Trump because of the Meagan Kelly and Trump falling out with Fox. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxtblX00yvg If you plan on entering the ring, be prepared to get hit in a political manner. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wEVpBPAt0s

If Donald Trump were to become president of the United States would he consider establishing one last Congressional Hearing to hold on the assassinations of MLK, RFK and JFK. Mr. Trump's champagne manger was Roger Stone, and Mr. Stone certainly does not believe in the lone assassin theory. Could there be a road to pave to get our next president to re-open this case while at the same time question the reason the Warren Commission selected witnesses they felt were appropriate while omitting vital, crucial witnesses that may have offset the record. Could the Warren Commission's Report ever be challenged and it's findings, now that so much information as been brought about? Could this president not be regarded as the president who's bought and paid for by Wall Street, or any three letter agency, but would advocate for the release of all Federally withheld documents on or before October 17, 2017? Would Donald Trump dare stand up to a government that has not adhered to JFK 1992 Act by releasing all information in full, however, all we've received has been political concealment. Could Donald Trump be that president who's for the people as we the people have a God given right to know what this country is doing, as paying tax payers, are these politicians not regarded to answer to the people, those who we elect in office? Now, speaking as Scott Kaiser, will the Donald have the balls to re-open Kennedy's assassination if he were elected president?