Ken Davies

 Actually, the story was that he was fishing in Northern Michigan, and he then traveled to a small airfield in Southern Ontario.  (This makes no sense. My home is less than 2 miles from Northern Michigan, as the crow flies.  Never heard of anyone fishing in that area in late November. Also there was a Norad air base close by, which surely he could have   commandeered a plane from  rather than traveling hundreds of miles to Southern Ontario.)

 The man who fire bombed Tokyo told a whopper of a fish story, and no one called him out on it !

On 4/25/2024 at 4:08 PM, Christian Toussay said:

 

..I've modified the sharing setting in Google Pix, and posting this to see is the link works now.

 

This is, by the way, an image of the man in the Sniper's Nest window, retrieved from the Hughes film, that is 5/6 seconds before the first shot:

 

 

To    me, this looks like a Grey alien, with large black eyes.

17 hours ago, Matt Allison said:

My question would be this then: if they have the ability to travel between dimensions, why would they need a physical flying machine?

They like the on board food and movies.

17 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

Why do we need to get into Oswald's pants?

 

It is probably a pressing issue.😉

 The photos remind me of the Steve McQueen movie, The Blob.

Charles, l cannot see the men, let alone goggles or blue police uniforms.

Ron,

You nailed it!

Even if Arnold S was flying it, as in True Lies!

There are many theories on this  case.

Would the average person consider them to be far fetched?  Would the average assassination researcher/ buff consider them to be far fetched? What about the average scientist or criminal investigator?

I find many theories to be far fetched based on 50 plus years of reading , critical analysis, and common sense. (eg. the defective AR-15, Greer shooting JFK, a person hiding in the trunk shooting JFK, Jackie shooting him, and various religious groups plotting the hit).

It seems clear that other people/ agencies were using the Lee Harvey Oswald name / identity (or a slight variant of it) at various times and in different places.  

It seems clear that various alphabet soup agencies had connections to Oswald.

It seems clear that those at the top of the CIA, as well as the military strongly disagreed with (hated is perhaps a better word) JFK and his policies. 

It seems clear that LBJ '  political life was saved by JFK's death.  The war in Vietnam was also "saved" and millions were subsequently killed.

It seems clear that the mob ( pick your favourite James Cagney name ) could not control the autopsy, Warren Report, MSM coverage, and control of records for 60 years. 

Theories dealing with any of the above,either alone, or in any combination may have credibility.

"Wait until November until you shoot him down."

Strange comment indeed, since the election was not in Nov. 1963.

What did Napoleon post?

Is he a member of the history forum?

 Mr. Joseph's comments above, supported by his detailed research prove his point in my humble opinion, which is honed by 44 years of legal experience.

On 12/7/2023 at 11:19 AM, Michael Griffith said:

Now, of course, if one assumes that Oswald went straight to the post office before going to work, that would have put him at work at around 8:17, assuming he was first in line at the post office and that the money-order purchase only took two minutes. 17 minutes is still a significant timesheet fudge, and showing up 17 minutes late would likely have been noticed by someone at his work. 

Moreover, there is the thorny problem of how Oswald could have afforded to spend $21.45 on a mail-order rifle when he only had $16 to spend. In the seven weeks before he bought the money order for the rifle, he finished paying the $396 balance that he owed the State Department. State Department records show that his debt was cleared on March 9, three days before he bought the $21.45 money order ($205 in today's dollars, no small amount). But during those seven weeks, Oswald only made $490, and his rent alone was $68, leaving him only $16 to provide for his family (Anthony Summers, Not in Your Lifetime, pp. 193-194). So how could he have paid for a $21.45 money order with $16? How did he and his family eat and pay their other bills during those seven weeks?

$490 -( $396 + $68) = $26. 

Theoretically, he could have paid $21.45  and had $4.55 left. 

Means, motive, opportunity.  Who gained more than LBJ and the war mongers?

21 hours ago, Sandy Larsen said:

 

Then you should consult one rather than rattling of a list of reasons why you don't accept the legal requirements for submitting PMOs to a Federal Reserve bank. (Every PMO was processed by Federal Reserve banks at the time. They probably still are.)

I debated this topic with Lance Payette, an attorney who was determined to prove that PMOs didn't always require bank stamps. If there were exceptions to the law requiring bank stamps, they would be given in Regulation J (Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 210). What does Regularization J govern?

From Investopedia:

Regulation J refers to a rule put in place by the Federal Reserve System that outlines how depository institutions must collect checks and other items [such as postal money orders]. Regulation J also directs banks and financial institutions on how to settle balances through the Federal Reserve. This regulation is one of many established and enforced by the Fed. Under Regulation J, institutions must abide by the terms and conditions set by the Fed. (Bolding mine.)

Lance couldn't find a damned thing to support his contention so he just made one up. He said it was covered in an agreement between the U.S. Postal Service and the Federal Reserve, something which he assumed wasn't publicly available. I found and presented it, thus proving him wrong. He then made up another way that would preclude the need for bank stamps. As a lawyer, he would have access to he Code of Federal Regulations. (I had access only to those statues sent to banking institution, called "circulars.") I asked him  to provide the statute regulating the thing he claimed, or any evidence that ANYBODY besides himself was aware of such a thing. Again, he couldn't produce a damned thing. I knew he was blowing smoke.

The circular that I cited for my proof happens to BE regulation J. It was issued to show it in its entirety including an amendment that had been made to it. Why don't you read it for yourself and show us all where there is mention of exceptions to the bank stamping rule? Good luck.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/historical/ny%20circulars/1960_04928.pdf

 

Good work Sandy.  My post above was referring to the speculations/comments of Greg.

Truly, this is an electrifying work !

You are suggesting that today's banking practices were in effect 60 years ago. Where is the proof?

Excellent article !

Well done Jim!

No,  the Cubans did not do it

That is because he was inspired  by the 20th.

How many of his interview subjects are still alive?

Hosty states that Bobby Kennedy called him at Parkland and that he told Bobby that JFK had been shot.

 That is not what RFK  and others have said.

But Hill got to tell us that he was not faster than a speeding bullet. What a thing to say Clint ! Absolve yourself because you were not superman.

Ron, keep these updates coming. They are more informative than the ongoing JFK  slept with ...

Joe,

Let us not forget Ike and his female driver during WW11.