Terry Mauro

***************************************************************************** ... So, I've managed to make some long-term and lasting friendships over the years from these forums. I've considered myself fortunate to have been able to personally get together with quite a few West Coast collaborators, who've been at the hub of my extended family for almost a decade now. I will finally make the journey to Florida in April. I've got the round-trip ticket, Rich and Shel, in my hot little hand, right now. And, as I've always stated and mean it, to those I've personally bonded with, like Len Osanic, Dix, Bean, Dawnie, Cris Carroll, Barb Junkkarinen, John Geraghty, and the same goes for Billy Kelly, John Judge, Mike Hogan, Myra Bronstein, Charles Drago, Tim Gratz, even Charles Black, and of course, I won't forget Harry Dean. Oh, and Simkin, too. If you're ever in L.A., "Mi Casa, su Casa." And, if you know how to drive a standard shift, 5-speed Ford XLT-Ranger pick-up truck, "Mi Caro, su Caro." But, you'll have to drop me off at work in the morning. It gets 35 to 37 mpg on the open road. ... That was very nice. Thanks Mike. And thank you Terry. (I think I'll take out a second mortgage on mi casa! ) ******************************************************************** "And thank you Terry. (I think I'll take out a second mortgage on mi casa! )" Len and Dix will tell you my word is as good, as my aim is true. Come soak up some SoCal sun when the days grow shorter up in the northern parallels.

Duplicate post deleted by T. Mauro 8-29-07 08:33 PDT

************************************************************* "The aim of 'the scheme' is to complete an international cradle-to-grave {although burdensome and boring socialism}, an individual and collective leveling-out on every social, religious, and economic plane. It is now at this point that even a 'greater danger' is found, as powerful forces mostly within the United States, both political and religious, vie for the position of control over 'this globalist scheme' by any, even desperate means, if nessasary in 'combination' as is in 2007 presently taking place." Correct me if I'm wrong here, Harry. I, personally, have nothing against the philosophy of Keynesian economics, per se. Instead, am I misinformed as to what I perceive to be a Malthusian, draconian form of economic policy that has been embraced, and in place, especially having commenced in the early 1980's, by Wall Street, and designed specifically for what was then destined to become part of Bush The Elder's, "Points of Light" and "New World Order," aka "Global Geopolitical Project," by which the American industrial manufacturing base was slated to be totally dismantled and rendered all but impotent by the 21st Century? Enter the international "free" trade agreements concocted of NAFTA and AFTA, which made the GATT appear antiquated in comparison. On paper, this may look all well and good for boosting The Third World countries' ability to sustain themselves in a new, seemingly more attractive "global" economy. But, what about the darker underpinnings to this new policy, such as the loss of viable jobs on American soil, jobs and employment opportunities which sustained the U.S. economy throughout the 19th and 20th Centuries? All this, so that corporate America might be able to legally incorporate out sourced sweat-shops on foreign soil in order to lower their overhead? This may sound financially logical when taking into consideration the high cost of rent and taxes no longer needed to be shelled out for factory space in the States, but what are the repercussions to the economic structure of the United States? Are we destined to end up like India, or S.E.A. with crumbling infrastructures, no viable means of employment except for service oriented venues, while only a handful of people in comparison to the general population [like the ones who answer the calls you place to your American manufacturers' sites in request for equipment repair, and/or applications assistance, only to find yourself routed to a number in Calcutta, or Beijing], have the opportunity to make a "living wage," access to affordable housing, and/or medical care? What's wrong with the picture here? How did we allow ourselves to be downgraded to such a paltry level of existence? Or, am I too far off-base in my observations? What's even more frightening is that the younger generations will accept, as de rigeur, the doubling and tripling up of families inhabiting living spaces designed for one family, along with reaping the consequences high density population usually ends up wreaking upon infrastructures designed for single family occupancy, like overloaded sewage lines, and lack of adequate parking, for starters. They won't know any better, because that's all they've ever been exposed to, or presented with, as options. I realize I am speaking from the urban setting, here. But, that's where the ever-burgeoning masses seem to migrate in search of already dwindling employment opportunities. You're encouraged to re-invent yourself, or become entrepeneurial in your "quest" to sustain a viable source of income. How many people actually have that kind of vision by comparison? Then again, you may counter, that when people are actually starving is when their real capacity for ingenuity will kick in. That's what I consider to be "Wall Street" speak. On another note, will we eventually have only 1 political party from which to choose? The "World," or "Global" Party? Ter

**************************************************************************** "I think it is time to ask members how much they would be willing to contribute for the price of an ad." From what I've observed over the years, the standard form in asking for donations usually reads, or asks in increments of: 5 dollars, 10 dollars, 15 dollars, or 25 dollars, with a box denoting "other," should the donation be for a larger amount [or smaller], depending upon the subscriber's means. I would think 25 dollars might be doable for some folks. Ter

***************************************************************************** Yep! Those were the days when the main forums of rational thought, and choice, were Prouty's [Len Osanic], JFKResearch [Rich DellaRosa], and Lancer [Debra Conway]. McMadman's, the newsgroups, and the .alts, were known as The Jungle, The Nuthouse, and The Snakepit. I met Dix at Prouty's. We were the only "chicks" on that forum, although at first, everyone thought I was a guy because of the spelling of my nickname Terry, with a [y]. LOL But, Dix knew what I was. I met Bean [bernie], my pet nicknames for Bernice, over at Rich's. I always, and still do, look to Dix for verification or clarification, and sometimes downright castigation for some of my antics. But, basically she's the Mr. Spock of a trio which would place Bean as a Capt. Kirk, and myself as that hyper doctor, "Bones" played by DeForest Kelley of the old or original StarTrek series. So, I've managed to make some long-term and lasting friendships over the years from these forums. I've considered myself fortunate to have been able to personally get together with quite a few West Coast collaborators, who've been at the hub of my extended family for almost a decade now. I will finally make the journey to Florida in April. I've got the round-trip ticket, Rich and Shel, in my hot little hand, right now. And, as I've always stated and mean it, to those I've personally bonded with, like Len Osanic, Dix, Bean, Dawnie, Cris Carroll, Barb Junkkarinen, John Geraghty, and the same goes for Billy Kelly, John Judge, Mike Hogan, Myra Bronstein, Charles Drago, Tim Gratz, even Charles Black, and of course, I won't forget Harry Dean. Oh, and Simkin, too. If you're ever in L.A., "Mi Casa, su Casa." And, if you know how to drive a standard shift, 5-speed Ford XLT-Ranger pick-up truck, "Mi Caro, su Caro." But, you'll have to drop me off the work in the morning. It gets 35 to 37 mpg on the open road. All I would wish for is that everyone be able to put their differences aside in order to work together on the common thread/theme of what's been at stake here for the past 40-odd years. The assassinations. And, I include MLK, and RFK when I say that. All the other infighting and speculation regarding NASA, or who's better than who, who's more qualified than who, are meaningless and smack of ego-posturing. Why not put all the animosity aside for a moment, take some time out to pool your ideas and your expertise together, and rationally discuss it, like intelligent human beings? Who knows what you might learn from one another? FWIW. Ter

****************************************************************************** Hi T.G., I would suggest whomever is left from the original "Dream Team," along with Mark Lane and Alan Dershowitz. Wouldn't Dershowitz be able to switch gears for a case such as this one? Your femme Nikita

****************************************************************************** "MOREOVER DOES IT NOT SEEM QUITE CLEAR FROM THE FIRST FEW QUESTIONS THAT TOMLINSON SOFTENED HIS MEMORY RE WHERE HE FOUND THE BULLET AFTER SPECTOR HAD A "BRIEF TALK" WITH HIM BEFORE HIS TESTIMONY STARTED? SPECTOR'S "BRIEF TALK" WITH TOMLINSON MAY HAVE CHANGED THE COURSE OF HISTORY!!!" Well, hell yeah! And, how about throwing in a few licks like, BADGERING A WITNESS? HARRASSING A WITNESS? How about, COERCING A WITNESS ABOUT TO BE DEPOSED BY POSSIBLY INTIMATING A THREAT OF PERJURY, ON SAID WITNESS' PART, IF HIS DEPOSITION DIDN'T COMPLETELY JIBE WITH THE ONE HE GAVE TO THE S.S., or the F.B.I.? This, of course, resulted in a case of Alzheimer's due to the sheer fear of being jailed, for perjuring himself. Specter and Tomlinson reminded me of Bud Abbott and Lou Costello in their skit, "Who's On First?" Specter is a xxxx and a faker. He got where he is today by lying his ass off. Your femme Nikita

******************************************************************************** "It might be interesting to get someone with "credentials" e.g. a published author, to write to every member of congress to see if there are even a handful who are at the outset interested." Exactly. "In order to convince Congess to put the resources (both time and money) into a new investigation, I think it will be important to identify areas of investigation needed because of developments since HSCA closed operations. I certainly think the Joannides matter is important because it appears that Joannides was actively working to obstruct the HSCA investigation. Despite what the court might rule, I am sure the public would want the CIA to "come clean" on Joannides. The problem is that I suspect that at the current time only a very small percentage of Americans are even aware of the Joannides case and its potential significance." And, that's why a project such as this one be undertaken, if for no other reason than to inform that larger percentage of the American population, of just these discrepancies, and how the positioning of someone such as a Johannides, served to obstruct and subsequently derail the HSCA investigation. The same may be said for Dulles' appointment to, and his coordination of, the Warren Commission. Secrets of the Secret Team in action.

Now THAT is a freakin' brilliant idea. I second the nomination of Larry Hancock. How many thousands of dollars do we need? (I'm sure we can't afford as much space as Kuntzler.) Ok, so just brainstorming this... We need: -To decide which newspaper we want to target and research prices. -The copywriter; Larry is ideal (contingent on his agreement ). -A treasurer or treasurers to collect and save the money and make sure this project is not somehow sabotaged. A lot of thought needs to go into that... -A coordinator. -Legal input (Dawn?). -A way to insure that if one person on the team flakes out the project goes forward without losing much time or work. -A way to deal with the inevitable agitators and infiltrators. -Stated goals, for example--insistence that all papers from the JFK act be released, that the murder FINALLY receive a proper investigation, that the documents that are sealed until 2013 or whatever be released, etc... -A call to action--something we want the audience to do to move us towards our goals. BK is very strategic and practical and could (if willing) help us come up with goals and calls to action. -Ideally do this as a coalition of forums Education/John, Lancer/Debra, Research/Rich, etc. -Then we might need a group name. We should do this. We really should do this. ******************************************************************************* "-Ideally do this as a coalition of forums Education/John, Lancer/Debra, Research/Rich, etc." Excellent proposal, Myra! And, don't forget Len Osanic from Prouty's. osanic@prouty.org. These forum admins need to coalesce and form a more united front. Hell, I've been begging for them to do that for years. We need to pool the best and the brightest of our human resources, here and now. How about a triumvirate of coordinators consisting of B.K., T.G., and C.D., for starters. That seems like a pretty well-balanced-across-the-board swath of political and philosophical representation. The triumvirate could select P.R. representatives, John Geraghty, for one, and Nathaniel H., for another, come to mind. These reps could be counted on to be strategically placed, and would best serve in delegating to those selected as most qualified, based upon prior experience, to carry out the actual foot work. A small base of operations could be organized, even if only in cyber-space, with a staff of volunteers who could help set up fund raisers, or take contributions, no matter how large or small, to help with the overhead, and possibly defray some of the cost. That's just one idea. I'm quite sure there are others out there in the research community with a whole lot more expertise at organizing something like this. But, in any event, you can count me in.

************************************************************************** "These 'newbirth radicals' intend to, and likely will remain in power for hundreds of years while using the names, republican, democrat or by any other title, or a name covertly indicating a specific combination of religio/politic preference." I see what you mean, Harry. Though, I'd liken them to the "neo-con-artists" of the "1 party - 2 branches" regime.

***************************************************************** Exquisitely well-put, C.D. Thank you.

I wholly agree. Charles *********************************************************************** My father, a former Democrat and supporter of FDR, became a Republican after Truman took office. He voted Republican for the rest of his life. He had respect for JFK, especially after witnessing his stance on the Bay of Pigs incident, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his proposal to withdraw the "advisers," that had been stationed, in Vietnam by 1964. He referred to Kennedy as a Liberal-Conservative, and admired the way he handled the steel workers strike and the coal miners' grievances. FWIW, I would call JFK a progressive revolutionary. Although, I'm sure the hawks surrounding his administration would've balked at any POTUS seeming so bold as to garner recognition as some kind of "revolutionary." A term they preferred to label back-water, Third World, insurgents who refused knuckle under to their demands, or those of the puppet dictators they installed amidst bloody coups. For a country, whose birth was delivered during the American Revolutionary War, how easily these hawks were wont to forget their own bloody, and humble beginnings. It wouldn't be until the year 1994, when Newt Gingrich, and his conservative "revolution," as he would refer to the Republican take-over of the House, would the term be used in reference to the U.S. gov. And then, only in this utmost bastardized form. It never ceases to amaze me at how a "play on words" can turn a simple descriptive noun, or adjective, into a metaphorical sword to be turned around and used against you. Semantics... Oh, to master the logistics of it all...

Mr. Janney: Thank you for posting this fascinating material, and good luck with your book project. A word of caution: Even a busted clock is right twice a day, but you should know that Robert Morrow is considered a person of very doubtful credibility in JFK/RFK research circles. John Davis (author of Mafia Kingfish) was working on a book on Mary Meyer. I heard that John suffered a serious stroke some time ago and may have been forced to give up the project. Perhaps he would share the results of his own research with you. I am aware that Robert Morrow's reputation as a researcher is questionable in some circles. But both Dick Russell ("The Man Who Knew Too Much) and Noel Twyman ("Bloody Treason") have used some of Morrow's assertions and have found that they checked out with other sources. Furthermore, the actual day that Nina Burleigh called Morrow to interview him for her book on Mary Meyer his good friend John Williams was present during this call. Burleigh tried to completely blow off everything Morrow said, completely discrediting him in her book. She also attempted to do the same thing when she interviewed Dovey Rountree (Crump's attorney), subsequently suggesting that Crump was actually guilty. But Roundtree's authorized biographer, Katie McCabe, was physically present when Burleigh interviewed Dovey and was astounded to read how Burleigh had twisted many things that Roundtree had said. John Williams told me in no uncertain terms that Morrow was more upset at Mary Meyer's death than he was JFK's, as did Morrow's wife. My father entered the CIA in 1949-50, having graduated from Yale University with a master's degree in Russian Area Studies. At one time he ran what was called "OCI," or the Office of Current Intelligence. He held a number of different jobs throughout his career, one was in Science & Technology that I know of, but many others I don't know of. He died young at 59 years old when he was director of personnel. He was career CIA. I knew John Davis but not well. I actually have a copy of his unfinished manuscript on Mary Meyer. A good friend of Davis' asked John "what happened to your book on Mary?" Davis replied "I decided I wanted to live." Davis' friend told me in no uncertain terms that John's life had been threatened and he was told not to publish what he had. Davis, of course, was using much of Leo Damore's research, which I originally tried to procure for Nina Burleigh's book. *************************************************************************** "My father entered the CIA in 1949-50, having graduated from Yale University with a master's degree in Russian Area Studies. At one time he ran what was called "OCI," or the Office of Current Intelligence. He held a number of different jobs throughout his career, one was in Science & Technology that I know of, but many others I don't know of. He died young at 59 years old when he was director of personnel. He was career CIA." Thank you, for being so forthcoming with this. My God, that is far too young, indeed! I'm sure the stress of the job alone, can take its toll on a body, health-wise. As far as the release of your book is concerned, have you ever thought of hiring a body-guard, or someone you completely trusted, or could count on against all odds? It might be in your best interests, especially when your book goes to the presses. You're going to need to make sure someone has your back for you, considering the impact of the information you're about to reveal, and what effect it may have on the status quo.

***************************************************************** "Should the HSCA have demanded to inspect the job record and assignments of each of the CIA people with whom it was dealing? In retrospect, probably so. But that is hindsight. It's like asking why Earl Warren never asked Allen Dulles if the CIA had ever engaged the Mafia to try to kill Castro. He did not ask because he never would have suspected such a thing." Thank you, my love. I'm so glad you're back. I missed your excellent rationale and explanation as to the whys and wherefores of many of these situations that were seemingly kept under wraps and away from public scrutiny. Then again, I can be such an impatient little hot-head at times. Especially when something seems drastically amiss, and I can't for the life of me, figure out how something like that could have managed to slip under the radar. I'll let Blakey off the hook, since you've succeeded in convincing me that it really was out of his hands. Your Femme Nikita

****************************************************************** "Terry, of course it was the CIA that assigned the people who would serve as its liason with the HSCA. Nothing unusual about that." What do you mean, "Nothing unusual about that."? No one in their right mind should have been entrusting the C.I.A. to do anything but stonewall the HSCA. That is, unless you're inferring that the whole HSCA was an intended fiasco, doomed from the start, being that it was set up under similar corrupted, and rigged circumstances harking back to the Warren Commission's dubious appointees? "The problem however is that Joannides was involved with JM/Wave, the DRE, etc, and should have been a WITNESS." Well, no Sherman, Herman, Issac, Thurman, Sherlock! All the more reason to question some "liason" appointed by the freakin' C.I.A.! Wouldn't ya think? "He was of course livid at the CIA when Joannides' role was discovered by Jeff Morley." Yeah, and for all we know he could've been working for the man [The Company], himself. So, as far as I'm concerned, he still didn't do a good enough job. If he had been on top of it, he would have interviewed Johannides from the outset of his appointment. Especially, someone assigned by the C.I.A.! Therefore, if Blakey had no suspicions regarding the C.I.A., then for all we know he was already unwittingly, or unduly influenced, or prejudiced in their favor. And, that ain't exactly what I'd describe as an unbiased committee member. Sorry. He blew it. Nikita

Said like a REAL concerned Patriot! If we don't do something about what is going down [and I do not mean 'voting' every four years in pre-rigged elections] we will soon have lost the chance to EVER recover the Nation...we've already lost the Nation. ******************************************************************************** "...we will soon have lost the chance to EVER recover the Nation...we've already lost the Nation." The only thing left to do will be, "Lock, load, and take that next hill." All on U.S. soil, no less. Where it actually should take place, instead of continually wreaking havoc all over the rest of the globe. The problem is with "us" as in, "We have met the enemy and they are U.S.," not the other way around.

************************************************************** "Ironically, the last job my father had at the CIA was "Director of Personnel" when he died in 1979....." If you don't mind me asking, how many years and how many different levels of employment did your father have with the C.I.A.? And, how old was your father when he died in 1979? Thank you.

************************************************************** "Why do you think Blakey even knew Joannides before the CIA assigned him to be the (a?) liason officer with the HSCA?" Probably because I haven't trusted many gov. appointees since the year of 1964, especially those put in key positions regarding any investigation concerning the assassinations. But, first and foremost, are you suggesting that the C.I.A. assigned Johannides? Because. if this is true then the HSCA was corrupted and doomed before it even started! Second of all, Blakey should have definitely been on top of this, and yanked Johannides on a "conflict of interest" issue. He didn't do his job, plain and simple as that. He allowed this to go down, right under his nose. Therefore, I consider him to have been complicit with the C.I.A., especially for not having taken evasive measures to dismiss Johannides. Third of all, I would never trust the C.I.A. to do anything, even if they tried to assign God, Himself to the HSCA! "Let's hope Morley et al win their appeal re the Joannides documents." It'll be a cold day in hell, before that ever happens, my friend. With love, Your Femme Nikita.

Duplicate post deleted by T. Mauro on 7-29-07 at 14:43 hrs PDT

**************************************************************************** "DynCorp, a private mercenary company that has done extensive spraying of coca plants in Columbia, has been contracted to do the job. Using DynCorp is hardly a coincidence. The new U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, William Wood, oversaw the company's aerial spraying campaign in Colombia 'The U.S. is hell-bent on eradication,' Harvard University Professor Robert Rotberg, an expert on conflict resolution at the Kennedy School of Government, told the Financial Times. 'They claim it worked in Columbia and so it will work in Afghanistan. It is not clear to anyone it worked in Columbia.' Actually, it is quite clear. Coca acreage in Columbia increased 9 percent in 2006, following a 26 percent increase in 2005. Coca acreage is the same today as it was when the spraying campaign began in 2001." So, who made these axxholes King Of The World? "We have observed that in some cases the employees of private military and security companies enjoy an immunity which can easily become impunity,' says Jose Luis Gomez del Pardo, chair of the UN Working Group, 'implying that some states may contract these companies in order to avoid direct legal responsibilities.' The Working Group found that mercenaries were recruited from throughout Latin America and then flown to Ecuador to train at the huge U.S. base at Manta. Others were trained in Honduras at a former training camp used during the Reagan Administration's war against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. According to the Working Group, mercenaries working for a subsidiary of an Illinois-based company, Your Solutions Inc., suffered 'irregularities in contracts, harsh working conditions, wages partially paid or unpaid, ill-treatment and isolation and lack of basic necessities such as medical treatment and sanitation.' A major reason for using private security companies is that they are not subject to Congressional oversight."..." And who, in the goddamned blue blazes of hell, does the United States of America think they are? No! Who in the goddamned blue blazes of hell does the fascist Bush administration, voted into power by a bunch of pea-brained, sniveling, "But, he promised us he wouldn't raise our taxes." And/or, "We can maintain our Christian superiority...Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition..." All while backing a dirty war over an imaginary stash of "weapons of mass destruction," which BTW, never did seem to materialize. "But, he's our president, right or wrong!" [Pardon me while I'll wretch and puke]. This kind of pinhead, knee-jerk, idiocy-bordering-on-imbecilic, sheeple-talk, along with the undying pledge of allegiance of a vindictive, moronic, greed-driven, mendacious electorate, is what put us into this, "Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive..." How does it feel to be a part of such a mean-spirited, callous, blood-thirsty, selfish, tyrannical, dictatorial autocracy, such as the one presently proliferating in the United State of America. Because, it sure in hell ain't a democracy. I do mean to tell ya. SO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? Are we going to let these bastards continue getting away with this? I'd rather go down in a blaze of glory than stand by for one minute more, forced to watch this carnage. This cuts and divides my family right down to the very core. Why? Because I can't fathom why a member of my family, a supposedly reasonable and intelligent human being, aside from being my own flesh and blood, would sell his soul to the devil at the crossroads. I no longer answer my brother's e-mails since he voted for Bush. And, why did he vote for Bush? Because he was afraid that his "right to bear arms" would be taken away by the Democrats. Hey, if "Freeway Ricky," the gangs of South Central, and the Locos en Los Barrios can continue to remain armed and dangerous in the "police" state of California, so can any other citizen who desires to do so. Because, that's what it will all eventually come down to. Right or wrong, Mr. G.W. Pinhead, along with the real rogues running the show: Rove, the Lying Rat-Out, and Cheney, the Genocidal Maniac. And, you mean to tell me they had the cojones to subpoena Michael Moore? My Country 'Tis 0f Thee, sweet land of Germany...Of thee I sing.

Yes, everyone would like to hear the eulogies at their funeral. I'm not challenging your view above John, and keep it open as a possibility, but can't imagine what [if that were so] Tosh could have in mind for being able anytime in the future to invent for his return......crash and journey out through the desert, mountains or jungle on foot against all odds?..... Tosh, if you did this...you've gotten yourself in a very strange situation, indeed, and can only suggest that the sooner it is ended [if it is indeed not true] the easier it will be to be forgotten and less damaging in the end. Your friend -even though you didn't send me any message about the love of my life, my dog Crazybear's death. ************************************************************************ "...my dog Crazybear's death." Peter, I am truly sorry to hear this. I only wish there was more I could've done. More that anyone, or someone, could have done, if the truth be known. My condolences and my heart, go out to you. Our critters are just like our children, only they give us unconditional love, and will lay down their lives for their master. Bless your heart, Peter. And, bless your dear, sweet, Crazybear's. Ter

********************************************************************* "Some CTs, like G. Robert Blakey, Dan Moldea and those who say it will also be a mystery and we will never know the truth are worse and more dangerous than CTs, who we know merely attribute a false psycho motive to their assassin." Worse and more dangerous for getting away with putting Johannides on the HSCA. He can burn in hell for that supposed "oversight." And, yes I will whip that dead horse into eternity.

Hi Dixie. That would be Laura Landsberg Hanning - unrelated to Tosh. It's a curious story, but as you indicated, she seemed to unwind more and more as time went on. http://home.earthlink.net/~lhann10243/ - lee *************************************************************************** I have her old phone number in my book. She and her husband were moving from Maryland or Virginia to someplace in the Midwest from what her last phone call with me was in regard to. She was supposed to e-mail me or call me with her new number, but I never heard from her again. She was a sweet girl. Alas that was, what? Three or four years ago? In any event, whenever all that fighting between Vernon and Dankbarr was going on over at Lancer.

"Terri" is wrong. "TerrY" is right. *************************************************************** HAH! HAH! HAH! HAH! HAH! Well, I'm glad somebody remembers around here, Jeez Louise! I thought I was losing it for a minute, what with totally flying past the title of the damned post, to begin with. DUH! Thanks, Doo, Bean, Ron, and Myra, for reminding me I need new lenses for my glasses.

********************************************************** Thanks, Ron. It must have been during that interim when I left JFKResearch and went over to Deb's. I knew she had been posting, and if I remember correctly, she had a sick child, at the time.