Christian Toussay

...Thks for the feed back. I am trying to fix this by trying different hosting sites. I am really not of the Digital Generation, and it shows....

Ok, so let's see what we can find in the right lateral autopsy picture. Hee is the original below: Below are two results after processing: There appears to be a large, roughly circular area of bruised tissues, devoid of scalp and hair, about 1,5 inches above the right eye, just at the hairline. Note how deep the metal rest is sinking into JFK's head, indicating absence of bone. Below we compare these results with Kilduff spontaneous description of the wound during the Press conference in Dallas: Below is a comparison with Z 337: And below is my interpretation of the head wounds, after comparative analysis of Moorman, Z 337 and those two autopsy pictures. I chose a top view of the skull, for a change of perspective: I had intended to go on with a presentation dedicated to the forgery of the record, but I will to see if this link problem is actually solved. If not, I will put this presentation on hold and see what I can do

...Apparently still having problem with the image links: the results on Z337 are missing, and even I can't access them... I am reposting them

" Obviously these sightings do not exclude the possibility of a gunman in police uniform on the 6th floor, but if there, he wasn't spotted by any observers." ..Sure, no problem. Photo analysis can be quite tricky. Re the specific quote from your reply, I think you are wrong: there is a witness that actually had a good sighting of the man in the Sniper's Nest, and that is the young Black boy Amos Euins (as I recall his name). He gave a very good description of the man he saw, with a very interesting detail: the man had a white spot on his head, a statement he made several times. I will show in the thread dedicated to the forgery used to alter the record, using the Dillard picture, that this "white spot" was actually light reflecting off the metallic badge on the front of the DPD cap...

We will now see the results obtained when processing two autopsy pictures, the back of the head pix, and the right lateral view. I post first, as a reference, the "original" autopsy picture of the back of the head: You don't need to be an expert to realize that it is a fraud, and a botched one at that. Imagine a Graphic Arts student bringing this to his teacher today. Notice the perplexing position of the ruler, which doesn't actually measure anything. I post below a processed result: Note the total disappearance of the "patch of wet hair", replaced by a large, vertically elongated, serrated wound with sharp angles in the occipital area. Also note that the puzzle of the position of the ruler, which had baffled researchers since that picture became available, is now solved: it is actually measuring the vertical axis of the wound. Notice apparent fractured bone area on the right side of the edge of the occipital defect. I post below, for comparison, a sketch of the back exit wound by Dr McClelland, which is strikingly similar (image courtesy of fellow member Kevin, who posted it here...): This is quite different from the classic representation of that wound as being an orange-sized roundish defect. But it does look very much like what we can now see in the processed results: a vertically aligned defect with serrated edges. The fractured area on the right of the occipital defect, still attached to the scalp and thus movable, very probably accounts for the variations in size and location by various witnesses. I will post different iterations from this specific data bank: Here is a composite with a 3D effect, for easier analysis. Note fractured bone area on the right of occipital wound: And to conclude this segment on the back-of-the-head autopsy picture, below is a comparison with Z 337, that we saw earlier: I will presents obtained on the right lateral autopsy pix tomorrow.

https://file.io/63uyw712WtWr Let us now analyze the wounds as seen in the Zapruder film. I chose Z 337 because we have an almost perfect profile view of JFK's head. The source material is the "Image of an Assassination" DVD: Note heavy blurring in occipital area, which nevertheless shows sign of disruption. The right bone flap hanging over the temporal area is clearly visible. The left bone flap is not clearly visible, either hidden by the angle of view, or because if has fallen back into place after the initial blast. I post now a processed result obtained on this Z frame. The frame has been rotated for easier analysis: From the above image, we can conclude that the Zapruder film has indeed been altered: this volcano-shaped exit wound should be seen in the "original" film. So we can now close the debate about alteration of the Zapruder film, which has been on going for decades now. It is a fact, and I will show more examples in the thread dedicated to the forgery of the record. I post now below a composite of Moorman and Z 337, so that we can look for coherence, or incoherence, in the way they both depict the wounds: In both pictures, we can see that portions of the top right and right temporal area of the skull are exposed. The position for the left bone flap in Z 337 is indicative, but the right flap perfectly visible. In both pictures there appears a defect in the occipital area: interestingly, the wound appears volcano-shaped in Z 337 (when JFK's head is seen in profile), while it has a long, oblique and serrated aspect in Moorman, where we have a 3/4 back view of JFK's head. We will come back to this in our conclusion.

Important nota: the file hosting service I use keeps files available for 6 days only. I would suggest interested people to download them for further review. Use of the material presented here is allowed according to Fair Use jurisprudence.

....OK, so I think I have found a way to solve this link problem. I am finishing the "Head Wounds" thread, and then I will come back to repost the missing pictures in the "Assassins" threads...

..thanks for yr advice. I am trying a different hosting site now, and I have reposted all the Moorman files in this thread. Hope that works now...

...Alright. So I will have to back to the old threads to repost working pix/links. I will first continue this "Head Wounds" thread, by reposting the Moorman images this afternoon...

https://easyupload.io/6yr2zx ..still a different file hosting site:

https://file.io/63uyw712WtW ....OK, trying to post an image (Moorman Head Close Up) from a different hosting site now: Let me know if OK

... I really don't understand why: everything is OK from my side (the pictures actually appear in the post) It would appear to me I am following the Forum instructions: use a hosting site and paste the image link in the post.. I am trying to find a solution...

...Thanks.. I am a bit baffled by what's going on; I've read the Forum guide and it says host your pictures on a dedicated site (I use Google Pictures) then copy the image link and paste it in the post. That is what I am doing. The images are not that big, between 30 and 150 ko. When I look at the previous threads, the images do not show up, but the links are working (right click / open link in new tab) I just checked the thread I posted yesterday (Head Wounds) and the images are visible in the post from my side.... I will try to solve this asap. What I could do, if it is OK with you, is send you one of those images so that you could try to post it from your end, and see whether it works that way...

" I have a working license to Photoshop. Could maybe dither to what could post? " ...I am really not of the computer generation. Can you explain to me what you mean? Anything that can help me present this research is welcome...

Please try "right click - open link in new tab" and let me know.

... To those following this and who cannot access the pictures: try "right click - open in new tab". I have just verified and there should be no problem. Just let me know...

Hi... No, the images are now posted on Google and I paste in the links as required. I just tried and they work fine: try "right click - open in new tab" and let me know...

...I have just tried them and they work: try "right click - open in new tab" and let me know....

...Sorry for delay.... OK, so I presented in the preceding "Decoding Dallas" threads images of three assassins involved in the shooting in Dealey Plaza, all wearing dark blue uniforms, presumably Dallas Police Department uniforms: - one in the Sniper's Nest : that is a high, back to front trajectory - one on the 2nd floor of the DalTex: that's a medium low, back to front trajectory - one behind the fence, near the corner: that's a medium high, front to back trajectory That doesn't mean that other assassins could not have been present, but not captured in films and pictures. Some researchers have elaborated scenarii involving up to 6/7 shooters. I would go here with what we have, three shooters and their locations, and see whether we can reconcile that with what we can now see of the President's wounds, once the corresponding record has been "cleaned up", using the simple methodology I already described. I will use for this analysis three sources showing the state of JFK's head wounds at different moment in time: - the Moorman picture, showing the wounds immediately after impact. It is a good example of how the process can retrieve useful information, even in "old evidence"... - Z 337, showing a profile of JFK's head about 1,5 second after the head shot. Evidence for systemic forgery of the record will be presented in a specific thread, but here you have a good example of it. - the autopsy pictures, showing the wounds allegedly observed during the autopsy several hours later. I will post first today results obtained on the Moorman picture. As explained, I worked on a version called the Morin Rellman version, in which it appears that the forgers were a bit sloppy while blurring JFK's head. Here is a crop from the Rellman version: Note apparent impact visible on JFK's right forehead. A very different iteration still shows the impact: In the following result, a large cavity in the top of the cranium is visible, with two bone flaps apparently blown away on each side of the head; Here is a different result (the data bank on this one is several hundreds iterations...). Note intriguing shape of occipital wound: And below is a close up, for good measure: From what can be seen here, I would conclude that a high velocity bullet above the right eye: - removed a a bone flap from the skull on the right in the temporal area, near the entry wound - removed a large segment of the top of the cranium extending towards the back on the middle/right of the skull It would seem to me that those bone flaps appear along cranial sutures, which would be of course areas of less resistance to pressure waves built by a high velocity bullet within the cranium vault. Maybe specialists could confirm this. As an aside, the kind of bullet velocity / pressure wave strength needed to break cranial sutures could be calculated.... The right bone flap is visible in Zapruder, still attached to the skull by scalp. It is very likely that this is also the case with the large left bone flap. Logic would tend to indicate that this large, loose segment of bone on the top of the cranium was put back into place by Jackie Kennedy. This means that the overall aspect of the wounds on JFK's head could be modified at will, simply by opening or closing them. This probably explains the sometimes striking differences between eyewitness testimonies. I will post tomorrow the results obtained on Z 337.

...Well, I don't know: it seems that the links in this thread are broken again... I will repost them, but if anyone knows how to avoid this, let me know.... Ok, apparently, the images don't show up in the thread, which is a pity, but can be accessed via the link. Anyone having trouble with the link, let me know....

Ok, so I thought we could move on to the next long suspected shooting location: the DalTex Building. Unfortunately, we only have one single source image in this case, but we will nonetheless try to make our case, using different iterations from the data bank of this specific file that the "optical artefact" argument is void. Let me add here something which may not be common knowledge: in the 9os, I read the Hugh McDonald book, "Appointment in Dallas". The book is very disappointing, given McDonald reputation as a law enforcement expert (he wrote several manuals). In his version of the JFKA, he pursued along the world an elusive assassin, code name Saul, a professional hit man who killed Kennedy from the Grassy Knoll, and actually agrees to be interviewed... But on the first page of this fancy book, McDonald claims he was given a tour of Dallas by an ex DPD officer, now a Bank Vice-President, who showed him the 2nd floor window of the DalTex Building and told him "That's where the guy who killed Kennedy shot from...". It may be me, but going from cop to bank vice-president in a few years seems quite, let's say unusual. The only member of the Dallas Police who became a bank vice-president is Paul Bentley. As it happens, Bentley is the man who examined Oswald wallet after his arrest while he was driven to police station, and is the original source for the alleged content of Oswald's wallet, including what type of ID he was carrying on him. I post below the original Altgens picture, for reference (since I believe everybody knows the original, I thought a redux version would suffice): the area of interest is in the red square. Note presence of a fire staircase, hiding the right side of the window: When processed and enlarged, the picture shows the image of two men in the window: one on the left, apparently the accomplice, and one on the right, apparently the shooter. The composite below summarizes the results obtained on Altgens. Please note the stripped gray area on the right, hiding part of the shoulder, are elements of the fire staircase in front of the window: I am posting below different iterations of the Accomplice, for analysis: Below is a comparative with a water colored version: I post now a water colored iteration of the shooter: And finally a composite with both men water colored: So this completes the analysis of the modus operandi of the shooting, based on photographic and films analysis: - the attack on JFK in Dealey Plaza was conducted by men wearing Dallas Police Department uniforms - this implies direct complicity from Dallas authorities, whether these are impersonators or bona fide members of the force: the fence team, for instance, was under the constant gaze of a DPD officer positioned on the overpass; DPD officers were located just under the sniper in the DalTex, guarding the intersection of Houston to Elm. Which professional assassin would choose such a precarious spot to carry his deed, if not assured of complicity? - Oswald did not shoot at Kennedy, and is thus innocent. The documents presented here actually constitute a case for the innocence of Oswald - the results also establish the full responsability of federal agencies in hiding the truth from the public, by deliberately forging the photographic and film record All this would tend to indicate, in my opinion, that the JFKA was not some James Bondesque stunt by some disgruntled party, but on the contrary a highly-sanctioned Military/Intelligence operation to remove the President. Ok, so I will rest a bit and come back here with a new thread "Decoding Dallas: JFK's Headwounds...", in a day or two. And yes, we will use among others the Zapruder film for that, showing that it has been altered...

...Yes, they definitively can: the last chapter of the presentation will be "How They Fooled Us", and is an in-depth analysis of the forgery methods used by the forgers to hide the truth. I think you will be blown away by the magnitude of the fraud that was deployed against the US citizens, and the world... - I did not get any exploitable results (to my taste and standards) on the backyard picture, except that there has indeed been tampering done on the face area - the chapter after "the DalTex Team" is dedicated to JFK's headwounds, and yes, alteration of the Z film is established regarding the occipital wound - the chapter dedicated to forgery will use the Dillard picture and the Powell picture to establish federal felony in the handling of photographic and film evidence. The picture you have posted looks like the Dillard picture. I used for analysis a version called the FBI Version, notorious for an a obnoxious black arrow, apparently pointing at...nothing. That is one of several sub mysteries of the JFKA that will be resolved in the last chapter. As for Oswald in that window, he would have to be taller than Wemby, or standing on a stack of box...

I am posting below different results obtained on Bronson frame n°2. Please note the count his mine, i.e. it is the second frame I screen captured from the YouTube clip. As explained, the process is iterative, which means that each step in the "cleaning up" of the image is documented in a specific file, which in turns create a data base. It thus makes it very easy, by simple chronological analysis of the results, to see how the image evolves from the altered original to the final results I am presenting. So these are different results from the Bronson frame n°2 data bank: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczObSFppkn7VzwK5p8IMB3Pz8vx1QaDfGo_QxKUk4GFXrC4hOdYfqyE1Nw0sC6N32EpWfL30rPCuyHtS9JNUqHLeln2Esvt5BbyYNncOM7TwyWvshftPUv4v-Kpe2-M7Lv_t79d4qYCwEZl6ejArmUZzNaSNahBrDVmvZXbZIkMtfpCZ6chn4VVB1u8tLvsiRb-4F_UwSlSNLB2d-gtPWxG3ha-sp24KUyDv397lFPuw4Yi6UNdGWj9HjVu9-lHQv2FlDkKzpymMOlaBQO7nVx2DZmcHDPLZcGrsksqcjuHbhTCVQvbu5fdC6LcojaOcxynrliwuNMZ2KmBDGVHlq6hF1ttvRtoJTO4HWQOwR88JVdt5ywZE1sOS-3K_d6OlERSIBDJiMaPL_tMh9nF58fJ3sNO5Tx7CxY1JFC3qShEbnbk4TWH-B7BOrloyE8hUpMLmwDODStfTM1rp1bDzo88AfrpmCnwkr8C0lNjQbkIfFPSndSirlX5TQL-sffqC-JCpO6IQa3vtcthTcPg54oiW86YYYMSq4SY-czgG4oJGDiKSxzzgyOXw6hUWQny4mLv1C9NJIQkDunTcgNlJ95kvuEqy3z1vMAkNA1PmwKUs9wfTKSHI8y_nS4gPO2MHtTm-Uy6l5D7vm4iN7H743F86pT01G8Uk3eeKDB0zoSIASqoaYagApbwC2Zj-xmIs62aKIIHB8R2rIt9FdOFMP77xdK9BJKleqtMMsvElMM0JpHn0GDtuD8MFPj4-x-TFU0aYgja57IArAbyrUUXQGjgpdwykIGjhOEdXEN315Ne0aoBw7rzON7dwPg3UxT-xycrkgV0AbwFOEgC9d5hr7QqaCxyvqen57_SeYxO0nbpw2q_wbhjY8F4hS6lVhlKlKaJy_foFaxDIQ3624TgOC97n2A=w1564-h834-s-no?authuser=0 Now I will post some results from Bronson frame n°3: Below is a composite of Bronson frame n°2 &3, for comparative analysis: ...And below is a detoured version of the composite, for those who would have difficulties visualizing correctly. Note that the detouring is done by removing geometrical blocks of data, so as not to influence/manipulate the viewer's perception: I will post now two results obtained on Hughes frame n°2. Again, these are different results from this frame data bank: Note that the whitish blob in the hands area is very suspect. This could be forgery to hide some specific detail of the weapon, like a scope. So the record shows that LHO did not shoot JFK from the Sniper's Nest, and confirms the participation of men wearing Dallas Police uniforms in the shooting. This is the second location were those uniformed assassins can be found, after the fence team identified in Moorman and Nix. The next thread will be dedicated to the DalTex team: it will be relatively short because the only source material available is the famous Altgens picture. When this is done, I will present here the results pertaining to JFK head wounds, using the Zapruder film, Moorman and the Autopsy pictures to show the location and nature of the wounds.