Terry Mauro Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 TRIPLE ENVELOPMENT Harvard's British imperialist professor Niall Ferguson has an article in {Foreign Affairs} which says in word-to-the-wise fashion that the world (what he archly dubs the American Empire) is about to undergo an extremely rapid-fire catastrophic collapse. For instance, "What is most striking about this history is the speed of the Roman Empire's collapse. In just five decades, the population of Rome itself fell by three-quarters.... What Ward-Perkins calls 'the end of civilization' came within the span of a single generation." What follow are paraphrases of two of Lyndon LaRouche's discussions about this today. More will follow tomorrow. We've got this thing by Ferguson, right? The Ferguson thing is not to be understood as a strategy, or something kooky. It's essentially a statement by those circles which he represents, of where the existing policy of the British and the Obama Administration's dummies, are going to go, or intend to go. So, therefore, they're not giving you a strategy; they're giving you a sense of where the situation is going to be, on which strategy will be based. So, they're outlining a destiny in Hell. And now, therefore, the next step is, which Ferguson did not supply, is: What is the strategy you're going to use for the Hell you're going to create? So, it's a triple envelopment, not a double. It's like Friedrich der Grosse, in terms of Leuthen. He turned it into a triple envelopment, and defeated handily a superior force. Well, the point is, his implicit intention is to forecast this sudden, total collapse as inevitable. Therefore, the question is, if that's going to be the condition of the world you're leading into, how are you going to cope with it strategically? So, he doesn't give away his strategy; maybe he doesn't have a strategy, but he has a picture which he estimates this is going to mean for the world. And that's where the problem comes up where people don't think in those terms. They all think in, "Who's winning?" Ferguson is celebrating Shelburne as the founder of the British Empire. It takes a certain kind of cynicism to do this sort of thing. He's saying the collapse, as far as he's concerned, is on. Now, he's saying to you, if you're a strategist, now figure out the strategy you're going to use. There's a certain element like H.G. Wells kinds of scenarios. The intention for impeachment of Obama is widely visible in the U.S. now, as reported below in the Briefing. Now, this is also just what you're getting from Ferguson. Ferguson is making a map for so-called insiders. Now, given this map, which he's implicitly taking as predetermined, then, what happens next? Now, you have to solve the problem of what happens next? So, the people get sucked into the thing, but not seeing the difference between a scenario like that, and a strategy. Then they become the victims. The moves towards impeachment? Obama's a sucker in this thing. Obama's doomed. The end of this thing is, Nero commits suicide. That's the kind of game that's being played. He may not actually commit physical suicide, but he's going to commit political suicide. The impeachment is all part of the scenario for the breakdown, isn't it? This looks like it's echoing Ferguson. We should actually, in our coverage, say exactly that. Don't say we're predicting that; say that this is the implied intention, whatever the actual intention might be. Report it this way: Say that all of these moves for impeachment are consistent with the scenario described by Ferguson. This is not a strategy; this is a forecast of the effects of the current British strategy. And, therefore, what it leaves out, is: "If that's the effect, then what's your strategy under those conditions?" So, therefore, it's not a strategy; it's a description of the result of the current intention of policy, and saying, at that point, "Joe, what do you do? What's next?" And that's where you don't get it, and that's where the triple envelopment operation comes into play. That's the triple. That, first of all, you delude people into saying that they're saving Obama's Presidency. Second, Obama's going to go down. Now, the person wants to get the world into this state. What's going to happen next? "Oh, you want to know?" So, now, somebody has to come along and supply strategy to match the condition which this policy purports to be bringing about. Number three on our part, is LaRouche's strategy for dealing with that situation. So, that, when you're dealing with that, it's like the caricature of Friedrich der Grosse at Leuthen. He was outnumbered, so he did, in effect, a triple envelopment, and won the day on the field of battle. And that's what our job is: not to get sucked into this, but to realize what the game is, to realize it's up to us to define a strategy to defeat the enemy's strategy, which we have to adduce. ---------- [What follows is a first-hand report by Cody Jones of Lyndon LaRouche's discussion of this with the Basement.] This is a rough sketch of what Lyn had to say this afternoon. He said he will make this clear to everyone tomorrow at the Saturday meeting. Lyn came downstairs on fire, and said he wanted to lay out very clearly what policy is going to be. First off, anyone who is lining up behind Obama is an idiot. Obama is on a suicide mission, and anyone who defends, or lines up behind him, is committing suicide. He knows he is a suicide case, which is the Nero in him. Nero was a suicide operation, and Obama is saying as much with the line he is pushing on health care: "If I don't get this bill, I'm dead." Well, he's dead either way, and the suckers are lining up behind him to be slaughtered. Meanwhile the British, through this Ferguson piece, are letting their insiders know that they are planning for and seeking catastrophe, that it is an inevitable consequence of their actions. Their intent is to destroy the U.S.--and take the rest of the world down with it, as exemplified by the way they are playing and using Obama. The Ferguson piece is study, a thematic study, a kind of road map for the oligarchs of what is to come, and telling those in the know, that this is what we have to plan for and be ready for. We will sacrifice many of our own along the way--there are too many players in the game as it is, but we are positioning ourselves to control the wealth as it will exist and be defined in a collapsed world. They are looking for the value that they will control in this new world. So the suckers will be drawn to defend a losing position in the Obama Presidency; meanwhile, the oligarchs plan for survival and control in an apocalypse. Those are your options A and B; but we will carry out a flanking maneuver, which is option C, the cosmic ray project. This will be an operation to show the stupidity of the positivists, to negate the positivists, by demonstrating what the real universe is, showing the fundamental paradoxes that arise in their world view, as we prepare for 1-G accelerated flight. If you think that you're going to take an accelerated flight into empty space, you are a damn fool,-- you find out real quick that space ain't empty, it's a highly structured harmonic field. We will define value from a future oriented perspective, determined by the intention to colonize Mars and master the phenomenon associated with cosmic rays. This will be our triple envelopment maneuver. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/659...ty-and-collapse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now