Jump to content
The Education Forum

Did you know that there are people who claim to have History Degree and ACLU work and not know this ?

Steven Gaal

Recommended Posts

PAST is prologue in 3 parts.


***++++**** The War Depratment/DOD from 1917 till today spies on the people who have views that are propeace or proworker.

Only a child would think they are not on the net this second and not just 'looking' but POSTING propaganda. ***


PART 1 .............. from 1917




LINK http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_n23_v83/ai_13594212/

April 5,1993


Reports Army spied on King, other black leaders - Martin Luther King, Jr

The Army began spying on Black Americans more than 75 years ago in a campaign that was centered on Southern churches and covered three generations of Dr. Martin Luther King's family, according to a published report.

The spying, which involved the Army's Green Berets, involved King's maternal grandfather, Rev. A.D. Williams, who was pastor of a Baptist church in Atlanta. It continued to include King's father, Rev. Martin Luther King, Sr., and the the slain civil rights leader himself, The Commercial Appeal of Memphis reported.

The newspaper didn't indicate when the spying stopped, but said it also involved such prominent members of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement as H. Rap. Brown and Stokely Carmichael.

The Commercial Appeal said its findings were the result of a 16-month investigation that included a review of classified documents and meeting notes from government and private archives, as well as more than 200 interviews with Army agents living in this country and Mexico.

The spying was conducted, the newspaper said, because of the Army's conviction that Black Americans were ripe for subversion by German agents during World War I and later by Communists and anti-war groups.

While previous surveillance of U.S. civil rights leaders has been documented, most has involved the work of the FBI and local police agencies, rather than the military. The spying during the 1960s civil rights era was conducted during the time when the Army fretted over growing unrest at home while much of its resources were committed to fighting the Vietnam War, the newspaper said.

"The Army was over a barrel," Maj. Gen. William P. Yarborough, the Army's top spy in the mid-'60s, said in an interview.

"Blacks were using the uncertainty of the Vietnam period and taking advantage of it. You couldn't expect people to be rational and look at this in a cool way. We were trying to fight a war at the same time where the home base was being eroded."

Atlanta Congressman John Lewis promptly urged Chairman Ron Dellums of the House Armed Services Committee and Chairman Sam Nunn of the Senate Armed Services Committee to probe the spying charges. "This disclosure dramatizes how deeply the disease, the stain and scars of racism were embedded in the American society," Lewis said. He added: "It's frightening and eerie to believe that the U.S. government. . .started spying on Dr. King when he was only 18 years old and a student at Morehouse College."




The Lawless State

The crimes of the U.S. Inteligence Agencies

by Morton Halperin, Jerry Berman, Robert Borosage, Christine Marwick

Penguin Books, 1976

In July 1969, the Department of Defense opened a new war room in the basement of the Pentagon. Staffed by some 180 people and packed with all the latest equipment -data processing machines, closed circuit television, teletype networks, elaborate situation maps-the new operation was a marvel of military technology. The most striking aspect, however, was not the imposing technology, but the purposes that were being served. This was not a regular command center but a very special operation-a "domestic war room," the headquarters of the Directorate for Civil Disturbance Planning and Operations. It was the coordinating center for the Pentagon's domestic war operations.

The office, now known as the Division of Military Services, played a central role in the military's widespread intelligence operations against the American people, a sweeping campaign of civilian surveillance which ultimately affected more than 100,000 citizens. In the fall of 1968, there were more Army Counter-lntelligence Analysis Branch personnel assigned to monitor domestic citizen protests than were assigned to any other counter-intelligence operation in the world, including Southeast Asia and the Vietnam War.' In the later part of the 1960s and early 1970s, 1,500 army plainclothes intelligence agents with the services of more than 350 separate offices and record centers watched and infiltrated thousands of legitimate civilian political organizations. Data banks with as many as 100,000 entries each were maintained at intelligence headquarters at Fort Holabird, Maryland, and at Fourth Army headquarters at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

As with the FBI and other intelligence agencies, citizens and organizations singled out by military surveillance were those who exercised their right to speak out: the oppressed minorities, advocates of reform, and those on the political "left." The growth of the army intelligence bureaucracy paralleled the growth of dissident protest movements through the 1960s. Military intelligence undercover agents focused on the civil rights movement of the early 1960s, and then moved to the New Left anti-Vietnam War coalitions of later years. No political gathering, no matter how small, was considered insignificant. No distinction was made between groups preaching violent action and those advocating peaceful dissent. Even the most established and nonviolent groups such as the NAACP and the American Friends Service Committee became targets of military surveillance.

With the exception of the FBI, the military intelligence services collected more information on American politics in the sixties than any other federal agency. The army conducted a full-scale Pentagon operation within the United States, and the figures and attitudes reflect this approach. Where a civilian agency might have opened a hundred files, the military created a thousand; the army established CONUS and CONARC intelligence commands, and then reorganized and reinitiated them as USAINTC, the Directorate of Civil Disturbance Planning, and the Division of Military Support. They ran operations with such code names as GARDEN PLOT, ROSE BUSH, PUNCH BLOCK, STEEP HILL, LANTERN SPIKE, QUIET TOWN, GRAM METRIC, and CABLE SPLICER; and they developed intelligence "compendiums," a "mug book," daily, weekly and monthly intelligence summaries, special reports, "city packets," contingency and alternative contingency plans, computerized filing systems, and crossover index files to information. All were based on agent spot reports, radio intercepts, incident and personality files, newspaper clippings and data from numerous civilian sources. Each level of the military hierarchy tried to placate its superiors by collecting as much or more information than the task required, whether it was of any importance or not. The attitude pervading these army operations was best stated by Robert E. Jordan III, general counsel to the army: "the people on the other side were essentially the enemy. The army conducted a de facto war against all citizen protest, legitimate and illegitimate, violent and peaceful, white and black.



With the rise of citizen protest and the involvement of federal troops to control demonstrations during the 1960s- especially in the area of civil rights-the scope and focus of the military's domestic intelligence operations expanded greatly. Often justified as necessary to enforce federal desegregation laws, these intelligence activities were in fact directed primarily against one side of the conflict: the black-civil rights protesters whom the military had ostensibly been called in to protect. Neither white segregationists nor local law enforcement plans or tactics interested the , military as much as did black civil rights groups and their leaders.


By the late 1960s, the direct political nature of military intelligence operations was quite explicit. A telling indication of this was the February 1968 annex to the army's Civil Disturbance Plan, where "dissident elements" and "subversives" were clearly identified as primary targets of surveillance. The activities of the peace movement were judged "detrimental" to the United States, and American antiwar activists were viewed as possible conspirators manipulated by foreign agents. This search for foreign influence within the antiwar and civil rights movements was equally evident in an October 1967 request to the National Security Agency by General William Yarborough seeking "Indications that foreign governments or organizations acting as agents of foreign governments are controlling or attempting to control or influence the activities of U.S. 'peace' groups and 'Black power' organizations. Yarborough also requested available information on identities of United States individuals and organizations in contact with foreign agents, and advice given by agents of foreign governments to groups and foreign agencies seeking to control or influence United States organizations. Yarborough and the army were certain that dissent could not occur without foreign orchestration.

No evidence linking these movements to foreign powers was found, but this did not prevent army officials from continuing to amass files on civilian groups. Military officials viewed civil rights protests and antiwar movements, as programs to overthrow the government rather than legitimate expressions of popular opposition.


In violation of federal statutes, a representative of army intelligence sat on the interagency Intelligence Evaluation Committee, and the army's general counsel served on the Law Enforcement Policy Committee. The army also created a master plan, known as GARDEN PLOT, which provided an outline for standardized procedures to be used for handling civil disturbances by the National Guard, regular armed forces, and civilian authorities. Based on preparations for future disturbances, GARDEN PLOT trained troops for possible deployment, and taught military and civilian leaders how to control these activities in a "war-room" setting. The DOD's domestic war room and twenty-four-hour-per-day monitoring of civilian disturbances were central aspects of GARDEN PLOT.

Military management training was brought to the local level and involved the FBI and other civilian officials. As far back as 1962, J. Edgar Hoover gave the army complete access to FBI files without charges for clerical or computer time, in exchange for the army's agreement to conduct biannual seminars in the philosophy and use of riot-control techniques for more than 200 FBI agents and officials. War games were held to practice coordination. In the U.S. Sixth Army area-including California, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona-Cable Splicer III, a GARDEN PLOT operation, simulated demonstrations by radical "leftist" groups on imaginary campuses and high schools along the Pacific Coast. The names selected for the mock groups in these war games indicate the usual targets of military intelligence: "the Scholars Democratic League, on the campuses; the International Brotherhood of Labor Reform, among the blue collar workers; and the International Fraternity of Progress of Non-Caucasian, among the minority groups.

Just twenty-one days after federal troops killed four Kent State students during an anti-Vietnam War demonstration, 1,700 military, civilian, and corporate officials met to discuss an after-action report on the war game. Major corporations represented included the Bank of America, Lockheed, Boeing, Sylvania, Pacific Gas and Electric, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph, Standard Oil of California, Jet Propulsion Laboratories, SCM, Dictaphone, and the John Hancock Mutual Life lnsurance Co.


with CIA Operation CHAOS and other illegal secret intelligence programs, only public exposure and the threat of congressional action led to the termination of military surveillance activities. Christopher Pyle, a former army intelligence officer, revealed the scope of the military's domestic intelligence activities in the January 1970 issue of the Washington Monthly, charging that "the Army had assembled the essential apparatus of a police state." Several earlier evaluations within the army had expressed "reservations" about the programs or judged them unnecessary and out of control, but it took the Pyle article and widespread public pressure to curb the growth of army spying on American citizens.

Once the wide scope of military domestic activities became clear, it was evident that they had violated both specific statues and the long-standing Anglo-Saxon tradition separating civil law enforcement and the military. The Posse Comitatus Act, originally enacted in 1878, makes it illegal for anyone to use "any part of the Army" to enforce civil laws without a presidential proclamation, and then only as a "last resort," where state and local officials are unable to maintain order. Whether the president and high-level civilian leadership were aware of the widespread military activity throughout the 1960s remains unclear. After examining the matter in as much detail as documents then (and now) available make possible, the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights was able to conclude only that "the highest levels of the Departments of Defense and Justice were or should have been informed."

... military intelligence operations against-American citizens did not end with the 1971 revelations. The practices have continued-though reduced- and the bureaucratic structure remains in place. The current DOD directive governing "Acquisition of Information Concerning Persons and Organizations Not Affiliated with the Department of Defense," issued on December 8, 1975, still contains the same loopholes as previous directives. For example, with the specific approval of the secretary of defense, information may be "acquired which is essential to operational requirements flowing from the mission . . . to assist civil authorities in dealing with civil disturbances." As the Senate Judiciary Committee reported in 1976.

... similar imprecise language in earlier directives was in large part responsible for the abuses of the past. The threat" exception is a loophole that has the potential to nullify the general restrictions embodied in the directive.

In the past, the military has regularly been called in to control civil disturbances and monitor the political activities of American citizens. Despite recent disclosures and guidelines, the potential for rebuilding the domestic war room has been preserved. The teletypes and data processing machines, silent now, may be readied to whir into action at the first sign of domestic protest.





link http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-goodman/obamas-military-is-spying_b_246655.html

Amy Goodman

Host, executive producer of Democracy Now!, NYT bestselling author, syndicated columnist

Posted: July 28, 2009 08:20 PM

Obama's Military Is Spying on U.S. Peace Groups

Anti-war activists in Olympia, Wash., have exposed U.S. Army spying and infiltration of their groups, as well as intelligence gathering by the U.S. Air Force, the federal Capitol Police and the Coast Guard.

The infiltration appears to be in direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act preventing U.S. military deployment for domestic law enforcement, and may strengthen congressional demands for a full-scale investigation of U.S. intelligence activities, like the Church Committee hearings of the 1970s.

Brendan Maslauskas Dunn asked the City of Olympia for documents or e-mails about communications between the Olympia police and the military relating to anarchists, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) or the Industrial Workers of the World (Dunn's union). Dunn received hundreds of documents. One e-mail contained reference to a "John J. Towery II," who activists discovered was the same person as their fellow activist "John Jacob."

Dunn told me: "John Jacob was actually a close friend of mine, so this week has been pretty difficult for me. He said he was an anarchist. He was really interested in SDS. He got involved with Port Militarization Resistance (PMR), with Iraq Vets Against the War. He was a kind person. He was a generous person. So it was really just a shock for me."

"Jacob" told the activists he was a civilian employed at Fort Lewis Army Base, and would share information about base activities, which could help PMR organize rallies and protests against public ports being used for troop and Stryker military vehicle deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan. Since 2006, PMR activists have occasionally engaged in civil disobedience, blocking access to the port.

Larry Hildes, an attorney representing Washington activists, says the U.S. attorney prosecuting the cases against them, Brian Kipnis, specifically instructed the Army not to hand over any information about its intelligence-gathering activities, despite a court order to do so.

Which is why Dunn's request to Olympia and the documents he obtained are so important. The military is supposed to be barred from deploying on U.S. soil, or from spying on citizens.

Christopher Pyle, now a professor of politics at Mount Holyoke College, was a military intelligence officer. He recalled: "In the 1960s, Army intelligence had 1,500 plainclothes agents watching every demonstration of 20 people or more. They had a giant warehouse in Baltimore full of information on the law-abiding activities of American citizens, mainly protest politics."

Pyle later investigated the spying for two congressional committees: "As a result of those investigations, the entire U.S. Army Intelligence Command was abolished, and all of its files were burned. Then the Senate Intelligence Committee wrote the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to stop the warrantless surveillance of electronic communications."

Reps. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., Rush Holt, D-N.J., and others are pushing for a new, comprehensive investigation of all U.S. intelligence activities, of the scale of the Church Committee hearings, which exposed widespread spying on and disruption of legal domestic groups, attempts at assassination of foreign heads of state, and more.

Demands mount for information and accountability for Vice President Dick Cheney's alleged secret assassination squad, President George W. Bush's warrantless wiretapping program, and the CIA's alleged misleading of Congress. But the spying in Olympia occurred well into the Obama administration (and may continue today). President Barack Obama supports retroactive immunity for telecom companies involved in the wiretapping, and has maintained Bush-era reliance on the state secrets privilege. Lee and Holt should take the information uncovered by Brendan Dunn and the Olympia activists and get the investigations started now.

LINK Declassified Docs Reveal Military Operative Spied on WA Peace Groups, Activist Friends Stunned

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now
  • Create New...