The Tumbling Bullet Theory

[Michael Griffith]

8 hours ago, Lawrence Schnapf said:

@Michael Griffith It is beyond absurd that david von pein would quote Lattimer- a urologist- for support. Shaw was an experienced surgeon at a hospital with an extraordinary number of gunshot wounds. He knew what entry wounds looked like and particularly the kind of wound that a tumbling bullet makes. 

There is an interesting backstory on Lattimer and he was one of the misguided "false patriots" who felt they were defending America's honor by goose-stepping for the Warren Commission.      

Yes, quite a few WC defenders believed it was their patriotic duty to uphold the lone-gunman theory. They viewed any criticism of the WC as an attack on our form of government. They viewed any suggestion that JFK was killed by a domestic conspiracy as a far-left attempt to shield the Soviets from blame and to whitewash Oswald's Marxism and pro-communist activities. Many contemporary WC apologists share these views. 

Anyway, Lattimer's blunders on JFK's head wounds were as bad as his gaffes on the SBT.

Edited June 14, 2023 by Michael Griffith

[Paul Cummings]

1 hour ago, Michael Griffith said:

Yes, quite a few WC defenders believed it was their patriotic duty to uphold the lone-gunman theory. They viewed any criticism of the WC as an attack on our form of government. They viewed any suggestion that JFK was killed by a domestic conspiracy as a far-left attempt to shield the Soviets from blame and to whitewash Oswald's Marxism and pro-communist activities. Many contemporary WC apologists share these views. 

Anyway, Lattimer's blunders on JFK's head wounds were as bad as his gaffes on the SBT.

Including those who served or worked on the WC.