Jack White Posted December 6, 2005 Posted December 6, 2005 Duke Lane sent me this email... "Jack, There is a photo of LHO that appears in the WCR that you had some years ago determined to be a composite, with the dividing line running diagonally across "Lee's" face. Can you email me a copy showing where that dividing line is, or point me to somewhere on the web that I can find one? I think you'll find what I need it for to be interesting .... " There are many LHO composite faces. I suppose he means this one. It is the so-called MINSK DEFECTION PHOTO. It is one of the earliest ones I found to be a split-face composite. I showed this work to HSCA in 78, but they refused to let me testify about it. Jack
Duke Lane Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 Duke Lane sent me this email..."Jack, There is a photo of LHO that appears in the WCR that you had some years ago determined to be a composite, with the dividing line running diagonally across "Lee's" face. Can you email me a copy showing where that dividing line is, or point me to somewhere on the web that I can find one? I think you'll find what I need it for to be interesting .... " There are many LHO composite faces. I suppose he means this one. It is the so-called MINSK DEFECTION PHOTO. It is one of the earliest ones I found to be a split-face composite. I showed this work to HSCA in 78, but they refused to let me testify about it. Jack Thanks, Jack, that's the one. More later.
Duke Lane Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 Duke Lane sent me this email..."Jack, There is a photo of LHO that appears in the WCR that you had some years ago determined to be a composite, with the dividing line running diagonally across "Lee's" face. Can you email me a copy showing where that dividing line is, or point me to somewhere on the web that I can find one? I think you'll find what I need it for to be interesting .... " There are many LHO composite faces. I suppose he means this one. It is the so-called MINSK DEFECTION PHOTO. It is one of the earliest ones I found to be a split-face composite. I showed this work to HSCA in 78, but they refused to let me testify about it. Jack Jack, see the Forensic Anthropology thread .... Duke
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now